
No change in the years long low locked and loaded over SE Canada. Its been quite awhile since anything of interest was able to survive north of 23n in the GOM. I see no change in the multi-year pattern.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
xcool22 wrote:what about stronger ridging over the gom hmm good questions to ask anyone ???
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service
ninel conde wrote:xcool22 wrote:what about stronger ridging over the gom hmm good questions to ask anyone ???
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service
The stronger ridging is certainly a hindrance. A locked low over se canada does many things. it protects the entire coast from impacts of interest, it results in higher pressures over the tropics, and it means anything that might form in the gom will be a slop gyre or stay south of 20n. Will be interesting to see in the next 5-10 years if a high ever domintes the NW atlantic.
ninel conde wrote:Im going to have to disagree about the GOM being favorable this season.
No change in the years long low locked and loaded over SE Canada. Its been quite awhile since anything of interest was able to survive north of 23n in the GOM. I see no change in the multi-year pattern.
ninel conde wrote:Im going to have to disagree about the GOM being favorable this season.
No change in the years long low locked and loaded over SE Canada. Its been quite awhile since anything of interest was able to survive north of 23n in the GOM. I see no change in the multi-year pattern.
Hammy wrote:tarheelprogrammer wrote:Well I for one am not cancelling the season just lowering my numbers from 17/9/4 to 10/3/1 mainly due to lingering effects of Super El Nino.
You're lowing your numbers to quieter than last year despite last year being in the middle of said Super Nino?
SouthDadeFish wrote:We had the earliest forming fourth named storm in the satellite-era and people want to give up on the season??????? I am quite confused.
I think people need to pay more attention to the various kinds of tropical waves that affect TC activity. Here is a time series showing 200 mb velocity potential, which is basically a measure of large scale rising (green colors) or sinking (brown colors) motion.
For example, in the Eastern Pacific, both Agatha and Blas formed under the favorable superposition of the MJO and a passing Kelvin wave. For the past month or so, the Atlantic has been under large scale sinking motion, which is unfavorable for TC development. Nonetheless, Danielle still formed during this period, coincident with a passing Kelvin wave. Although they are not the only influence on TC development, these various tropical waves play an important role. Since it now appears the Atlantic will be entering a time period of enhanced rising motion seemingly associated with the MJO, I would not be surprised to see another TC or two form in the basin during the month of July, perhaps when another strong Kelvin wave passes across a vigorous African easterly wave. Just something to keep an eye on going forward.
Note: This map was created through Dr. Carl Schreck's webpage. Similar maps can be found here: http://monitor.cicsnc.org/mjo/v2/
ninel conde wrote:SouthDadeFish wrote:We had the earliest forming fourth named storm in the satellite-era and people want to give up on the season??????? I am quite confused.
I think people need to pay more attention to the various kinds of tropical waves that affect TC activity. Here is a time series showing 200 mb velocity potential, which is basically a measure of large scale rising (green colors) or sinking (brown colors) motion.
For example, in the Eastern Pacific, both Agatha and Blas formed under the favorable superposition of the MJO and a passing Kelvin wave. For the past month or so, the Atlantic has been under large scale sinking motion, which is unfavorable for TC development. Nonetheless, Danielle still formed during this period, coincident with a passing Kelvin wave. Although they are not the only influence on TC development, these various tropical waves play an important role. Since it now appears the Atlantic will be entering a time period of enhanced rising motion seemingly associated with the MJO, I would not be surprised to see another TC or two form in the basin during the month of July, perhaps when another strong Kelvin wave passes across a vigorous African easterly wave. Just something to keep an eye on going forward.
Note: This map was created through Dr. Carl Schreck's webpage. Similar maps can be found here: http://monitor.cicsnc.org/mjo/v2/
I see the very weak sloppy early storms as a sign of a dead season, not an active one, like 1997. As far as later in July nothing of interest will form unless or until that permanent low over se canada is gone for good(not a day or 2) and the high pressures over the entire tropical atlantic relax. It doesnt seem to matter anymore what the sst's over the pacific are.
Hammy wrote:ninel conde wrote:SouthDadeFish wrote:We had the earliest forming fourth named storm in the satellite-era and people want to give up on the season??????? I am quite confused.
I think people need to pay more attention to the various kinds of tropical waves that affect TC activity. Here is a time series showing 200 mb velocity potential, which is basically a measure of large scale rising (green colors) or sinking (brown colors) motion.
For example, in the Eastern Pacific, both Agatha and Blas formed under the favorable superposition of the MJO and a passing Kelvin wave. For the past month or so, the Atlantic has been under large scale sinking motion, which is unfavorable for TC development. Nonetheless, Danielle still formed during this period, coincident with a passing Kelvin wave. Although they are not the only influence on TC development, these various tropical waves play an important role. Since it now appears the Atlantic will be entering a time period of enhanced rising motion seemingly associated with the MJO, I would not be surprised to see another TC or two form in the basin during the month of July, perhaps when another strong Kelvin wave passes across a vigorous African easterly wave. Just something to keep an eye on going forward.
Note: This map was created through Dr. Carl Schreck's webpage. Similar maps can be found here: http://monitor.cicsnc.org/mjo/v2/
I see the very weak sloppy early storms as a sign of a dead season, not an active one, like 1997. As far as later in July nothing of interest will form unless or until that permanent low over se canada is gone for good(not a day or 2) and the high pressures over the entire tropical atlantic relax. It doesnt seem to matter anymore what the sst's over the pacific are.
You'd absolutely lose your mind if we had another 1998/2004 repeat with not so much as a depression until late July. "Sloppy" storms in June are typical, but we've had three instead of one. Troughing is normal in June/July. And we've had several more active years with less storms so none of this is any indication of a less active season.
These posts are so absurd to the point of getting to be clutter, don't add anything, and literally ignore all factual/statistical history to the point of bordering on trolling and as such are not worth my time to respond to after this.
Alyono wrote:I will say this, ninel's posts sure are entertaining
The Gulf produced 2 storms this year. All signs are more are on the way in August and September. Yet because of ridging in JULY, that means no more Gulf storms?
That's as silly as saying Rosberg did not try and take out Hamilton today
tarheelprogrammer wrote:As long as the EPAC continues to crank up storms then the Atlantic will struggle to get going thanks to shear. Hopefully the EPAC continues churning and it kills the Atlantic.
Yellow Evan wrote:tarheelprogrammer wrote:As long as the EPAC continues to crank up storms then the Atlantic will struggle to get going thanks to shear. Hopefully the EPAC continues churning and it kills the Atlantic.
Not sure that'll keep happening once MJO/CCKW leaves the EPAC though.
Users browsing this forum: cheezyWXguy, Zonacane and 43 guests