ATL: EARL - Remnants - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 12:57 pm
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
It has that "Big blob of convection" look to it again.
1 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- Yellow Evan
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 16143
- Age: 27
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
- Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
tatertawt24 wrote:It has that "Big blob of convection" look to it again.
A sign mid-level shear is increasing again.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2907
- Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 6:19 pm
- Location: Trinidad and Tobago
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
tatertawt24 wrote:It has that "Big blob of convection" look to it again.
Seems to be an overnight thing with 97L to acquire the blob look.



0 likes
PLEASE NOTE: With the exception of information from weather agencies that I may copy and paste here, my posts will NEVER be official, since I am NOT a meteorologist. They are solely my amateur opinion, and may or may not be accurate. Therefore, please DO NOT use them as official details, particularly when making important decisions. Thank you.
- wflamholtz
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 30
- Age: 29
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 8:30 pm
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
Yellow Evan wrote:tatertawt24 wrote:It has that "Big blob of convection" look to it again.
A sign mid-level shear is increasing again.
I think it has more to do with the diurnal cycle and associated low-level vorticity
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
it's more upper shear
this has outrun the upper anti-cyclone
the models are almost always right these days. This is not the 1990s anymore where the models did not have a clue due to poor resolution and lack of understanding in data assimilation. They have been saying slow development, and that is what we are seeing
this has outrun the upper anti-cyclone
the models are almost always right these days. This is not the 1990s anymore where the models did not have a clue due to poor resolution and lack of understanding in data assimilation. They have been saying slow development, and that is what we are seeing
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
System is moving closest to Jamaica's radar now and it looks like it's gotten better organized since earlier and there are some hints of possible ENE-NE movement of some of the rain on radar. Should be an interesting discussion at 2am given that we have a nice view of the internal structure at the moment.
This kind of reminds me of Dolly in 2008, going almost insane watching every little low cloud motion to tell if it's closed or not.
This kind of reminds me of Dolly in 2008, going almost insane watching every little low cloud motion to tell if it's closed or not.
0 likes
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
its quite likely been a TS most of the day.. if I had the time I would do a post analysis on it. its rather ridiculous really.
1 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 12:57 pm
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
Hammy wrote:System is moving closest to Jamaica's radar now and it looks like it's gotten better organized since earlier and there are some hints of possible ENE-NE movement of some of the rain on radar. Should be an interesting discussion at 2am given that we have a nice view of the internal structure at the moment.
This kind of reminds me of Dolly in 2008, going almost insane watching every little low cloud motion to tell if it's closed or not.
This is similar to Dolly in a lot of ways. Dolly was named around the same general area, I believe; around the same time of year, too. Are any of the models still calling for a southern TX landfall?
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote:its quite likely been a TS most of the day.. if I had the time I would do a post analysis on it. its rather ridiculous really.
I had to stick the Jamaica radar images in a program to go back and fourth so I could check them, and while I don't think it's been closed most of the day it seems pretty clear over the last hour or so that there is westerly inflow just south of where the circulation is at. 11 am tomorrow should see an upgrade if they don't do a special advisory once the plane gets there later tonight.
tatertawt24 wrote: Are any of the models still calling for a southern TX landfall?
Most of the models at this point seem to be centering in the general vicinity of Veracruz--the high is much stronger than it was in 2008 at the moment so there won't be much if any gain in latitude once it reaches the GoM.
0 likes
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
Hammy wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:its quite likely been a TS most of the day.. if I had the time I would do a post analysis on it. its rather ridiculous really.
I had to stick the Jamaica radar images in a program to go back and fourth so I could check them, and while I don't think it's been closed most of the day it seems pretty clear over the last hour or so that there is westerly inflow just south of where the circulation is at. 11 am tomorrow should see an upgrade if they don't do a special advisory once the plane gets there later tonight.tatertawt24 wrote: Are any of the models still calling for a southern TX landfall?
Most of the models at this point seem to be centering in the general vicinity of Veracruz--the high is much stronger than it was in 2008 at the moment so there won't be much if any gain in latitude once it reaches the GoM.
systems have been upgraded for even the slightest and weakest west wind with systems that have had less organization than this. to say there is not even weak west winds is silly given proximity to land. Even though the effect on land would be the same. its about the data ... having a central/eastern Caribbean development when it pretty much never happens is very important. the lack of data after so many years in the MDR and carribean is still so silly to me.
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

Seems to be developing a very small and tight LLC.
0 likes
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
Radar although looking close to the mid levels is indicating a very well defined system... however still small in size. its quite likely a moderate to strong TS in a localized area.
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
- AJC3
- Admin
- Posts: 3999
- Age: 61
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
- Location: Ballston Spa, New York
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
Radar, surface obs, scatterometer data, all of them show a sharp wave axis.
This doesn't have a closed center, and certainly didn't have one Monday morning either.
This doesn't have a closed center, and certainly didn't have one Monday morning either.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
AJC3 wrote:Radar, surface obs, scatterometer data, all of them show a sharp wave axis.
This doesn't have a closed center, and certainly didn't have one Monday morning either.
not enough data to determine either way. thats the problem.
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
- AJC3
- Admin
- Posts: 3999
- Age: 61
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
- Location: Ballston Spa, New York
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote:AJC3 wrote:Radar, surface obs, scatterometer data, all of them show a sharp wave axis.
This doesn't have a closed center, and certainly didn't have one Monday morning either.
not enough data to determine either way. thats the problem.
Every piece of data I've looked at says it's not, especially radar. Pretty clear to me.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
AJC3 wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:AJC3 wrote:Radar, surface obs, scatterometer data, all of them show a sharp wave axis.
This doesn't have a closed center, and certainly didn't have one Monday morning either.
not enough data to determine either way. thats the problem.
Every piece of data I've looked at says it's not, especially radar. Pretty clear to me.
fair enough. given the circumstance .. that and ill take your word anytime

0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
- AJC3
- Admin
- Posts: 3999
- Age: 61
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
- Location: Ballston Spa, New York
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote:AJC3 wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:
not enough data to determine either way. thats the problem.
Every piece of data I've looked at says it's not, especially radar. Pretty clear to me.
fair enough. given the circumstance .. that and ill take your word anytime

Give it another 36 hours or so. I suspect that it'll close off as it slows down a little more on it's approach to CENTAM.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
AJC3 wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:AJC3 wrote:
Every piece of data I've looked at says it's not, especially radar. Pretty clear to me.
fair enough. given the circumstance .. that and ill take your word anytime
Give it another 36 hours or so. I suspect that it'll close off as it slows down a little more on it's approach to CENTAM.
oh yes the physics of it all ... if it were pure thermodynamics based it would be regardless of forward motion, but oh well its all fun

0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
- AJC3
- Admin
- Posts: 3999
- Age: 61
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
- Location: Ballston Spa, New York
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote: oh yes the physics of it all ... if it were pure thermodynamics based it would be regardless of forward motion, but oh well its all fun... the definitions ...
Easy way to solve this.... LOL
https://twitter.com/WxmanTony/status/759835130852540417
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests