#331 Postby Steve » Thu Sep 22, 2016 10:27 pm
That's fine and all Storms Expert, but you can't ignore its other signals. It's like this. All major models, including recent runs of the GFS, stall a front in East Texas north/NNE almost to the lakes. After that it gets a push, possibly in part due to former Pacific energy, but I have to look at that later to see what deepens the low in the NC US and moves it on. Behind it is a massive high, and the US suite shows that 10-15 days will be hotter than average in the east. Earlier depictions of the models had the big high spinning off the mid Atlantic and possibly rotating southward or even southeastward. GFS has a known recurve bias, and it gradually shifts systems west over time. I suspect that would be amplified by whatever physics factors are built in toward climatology. So it might be right as run. But it more likely is giving other signals that when interpreted show a different likelihood than the operational run.
I don't really have an opinion, since this hasn't even hit the Atlantic. But one thing I would add is this. If Megi hits the track suggested by the JTWC (who often heavily weighs GFS), no way will this recurve unless it does it early or late. 4 days out, Megi's progged track is smoothing a wnw track slightly westward as it it crosses Southern Taiwan and goes into China just north of Hong Kong. 7-10 days out from the 27th is October 4-7. There is literally a telegraph (possibly the last one) by the WPAC. So I could see a recurve before 65W or maybe after 14-15 days from now, but there will be a point where this system is under the ridge with no way to recurve.
Last edited by
Steve on Thu Sep 22, 2016 11:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes