ATL: MATTHEW - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1461 Postby Bocadude85 » Tue Sep 27, 2016 5:58 pm

TheStormExpert wrote:
Bocadude85 wrote:
TheStormExpert wrote:The 18z GFS continues the ever so gradual westward trends from over the past few GFS runs.


The gap between the Euro and GFS is slowly closing. The timing is still a little different but the distance gap has definitely been closing with each new run.

Wouldn't be surprised to see the 00z Euro overnight trend even more eastward while the 00z GFS trends more westward.


I'm not sure the 12Z EURO really shifted east...more north then east of the 0Z run. Tonight's 0Z run could very well shift east however. It will be interesting to see if the 0Z GFS continues the trend of small westward shifts. I'd say the threat to Jamaica/Cuba/Bahamas is quickly increasing.
0 likes   

User avatar
p1nheadlarry
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 672
Age: 33
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:42 pm
Location: SR County FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1462 Postby p1nheadlarry » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:01 pm

SeGaBob wrote:
PTrackerLA wrote:Yikes at the Euro ensembles! :eek: Most in the Gulf and showing major hurricanes...

How accurate are ensembles?


Depends how clustered they are over time. Ensembles basically run with slight tweaks to data for the massive equations that are used, which yields different results in track and intensity and etcetera of the atmosphere (not just our low pressure system, but the jet, bermuda high, and so on). The more clustered they are, the less likely that these tweaks change the outcome of the systems involved and is a more confident forecast. Catch-22 is, these models write the equations for these systems slightly different from each other, which is why you see them interpret our weather differently.
0 likes   
--;->#GoNoles--;->.

User avatar
TheProfessor
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3506
Age: 28
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:56 am
Location: Wichita, Kansas

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1463 Postby TheProfessor » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:03 pm

meriland23 wrote:Question is if the GFS predicts a major Hurricane, of course this far out is very flexible but I am rather confused. On one hand, the MB is around 950 upon landfall, Cat 3. On other GFS models, it's 930ish, Cat 4.


So I think you're asking why on some images the GFS is showing a 950 mb storm and on other images it shows a 930is mb storm. If this is your question and your were looking at the same hours for each pressure read you likely see this difference because the map of the 930ish storm is a higher resolution than the map of the 950is storm.
0 likes   
An alumnus of The Ohio State University.

Your local National Weather Service office is your best source for weather information.

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1464 Postby ConvergenceZone » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:04 pm

tolakram wrote:
CalmBeforeStorm wrote:
TheDreamTraveler wrote:Wow just hooks it right into the northeast. I'm practically laughing at what the GFS is showing

Why?


Because it's complete nonsense, almost like the GFS wants to win a popularity contest by showing something dramatic out in fantasy land. The GFS skill at that range is a little better than a blindfolded kid throwing darts at a map. :lol:


Nonetheless, it's the trend westward that shouldn't be ignored. First, the Euro showing it dangerously close to Miami, and now this? I'd say we better start paying attention just in case
0 likes   

User avatar
meriland23
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1239
Age: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1465 Postby meriland23 » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:05 pm

Interesting that this run is almost right up into NY as a Maj. I mean, I didn't expect that big of a shift from the GFS in six hours. That is impressively scary. All that being said, we shall see what 00z GFS shows, if it is still in agreement with 18z or more-so, then I would be a little worried given the fact it is shifting from a fish into a direct hit the more time goes on. It is worth a close eye on.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
CalmBeforeStorm
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 600
Age: 71
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:55 pm
Location: Stuart, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1466 Postby CalmBeforeStorm » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:07 pm

tolakram wrote:
CalmBeforeStorm wrote:
TheDreamTraveler wrote:Wow just hooks it right into the northeast. I'm practically laughing at what the GFS is showing

Why?


Because it's complete nonsense, almost like the GFS wants to win a popularity contest by showing something dramatic out in fantasy land. The GFS skill at that range is a little better than a blindfolded kid throwing darts at a map. :lol:

I agree that anything out that far is fantasy land but I don't agree that a synoptic setup at that range is impossible. Why is such a setup laughable synoptic ally? What's laughable about it?
0 likes   

User avatar
p1nheadlarry
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 672
Age: 33
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:42 pm
Location: SR County FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1467 Postby p1nheadlarry » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:09 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:
tolakram wrote:
CalmBeforeStorm wrote:Why?


Because it's complete nonsense, almost like the GFS wants to win a popularity contest by showing something dramatic out in fantasy land. The GFS skill at that range is a little better than a blindfolded kid throwing darts at a map. :lol:


Nonetheless, it's the trend westward that shouldn't be ignored. First, the Euro showing it dangerously close to Miami, and now this? I'd say we better start paying attention just in case


Though a ~920 mb hurricane hitting near OBX/VA Beach is quite crazy. It's just another model run without a closed center to initialize far out in time. The mesoscale/hurricane models especially have trouble interpreting the disturbance and nearby conditions of our ocean/atmosphere without this feat accomplished yet. Remember the HWRF with Hermine? It did fairly well, once it was a TD/TS that is.
0 likes   
--;->#GoNoles--;->.

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1468 Postby sma10 » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:10 pm

Okay. Regarding the 18Z GFS...I don't even know where to begin. Prior to it slamming into NYC at 933mb, it spends 3.5 days lumbering up the coast from the Bahamas at 915-925mb, basically 3 days of Cat 4/5 strength. The storm surge would be unimaginable, the destruction beyond catastrophic.

Will this happen? Not a chance.

But it would make a HELL of a great film.
1 likes   

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4543
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1469 Postby toad strangler » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:11 pm

CalmBeforeStorm wrote:
tolakram wrote:
CalmBeforeStorm wrote:Why?


Because it's complete nonsense, almost like the GFS wants to win a popularity contest by showing something dramatic out in fantasy land. The GFS skill at that range is a little better than a blindfolded kid throwing darts at a map. :lol:

I agree that anything out that far is fantasy land but I don't agree that a synoptic setup at that range is impossible. Why is such a setup laughable synoptic ally? What's laughable about it?


This gigantic cyclone basically goes POOF after that crazy hook through Manhattan. I honestly chuckled. The entire cyclone just evaporates on the double.

#bogus
0 likes   

User avatar
meriland23
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1239
Age: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1470 Postby meriland23 » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:11 pm

TheDreamTraveler wrote:Wow just hooks it right into the northeast. I'm practically laughing at what the GFS is showing



It's not funny though, and there is a reason it is hooking NW in this run. There have been many instances where the GFS/EURO were initially correct 200+ hours out before changing it into the wrong outcome. So despite how unusual the run is, pay attention to the fact it did change in a way that somehow will likely affect us.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
CalmBeforeStorm
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 600
Age: 71
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:55 pm
Location: Stuart, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1471 Postby CalmBeforeStorm » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:11 pm

p1nheadlarry wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:
tolakram wrote:
Because it's complete nonsense, almost like the GFS wants to win a popularity contest by showing something dramatic out in fantasy land. The GFS skill at that range is a little better than a blindfolded kid throwing darts at a map. :lol:


Nonetheless, it's the trend westward that shouldn't be ignored. First, the Euro showing it dangerously close to Miami, and now this? I'd say we better start paying attention just in case


Though a ~920 mb hurricane hitting near OBX/VA Beach is quite crazy. It's just another model run without a closed center to initialize far out in time. The mesoscale/hurricane models especially have trouble interpreting the disturbance and nearby conditions of our ocean/atmosphere without this feat accomplished yet. Remember the HWRF with Hermine? It did fairly well, once it was a TD/TS that is.

I really don't think the models have much trouble with such well defined invests as 97l.
0 likes   

User avatar
meriland23
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1239
Age: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1472 Postby meriland23 » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:13 pm

sma10 wrote:Okay. Regarding the 18Z GFS...I don't even know where to begin. Prior to it slamming into NYC at 933mb, it spends 3.5 days lumbering up the coast from the Bahamas at 915-925mb, basically 3 days of Cat 4/5 strength. The storm surge would be unimaginable, the destruction beyond catastrophic.

Will this happen? Not a chance.

But it would make a HELL of a great film.


I am curious as to what makes you so sure it wont happen? Like I would like to know why without a doubt you 'know' it wont.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10147
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1473 Postby Blown Away » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:14 pm

The consistency of the models showing a major hurricane run after run and day after day is unbelievable given what we have seen for years... Wow, today has been a very scary modeling day... Fortunately the focus changes daily, yesterday I thought Puerto Rico was in play...
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
CalmBeforeStorm
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 600
Age: 71
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:55 pm
Location: Stuart, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1474 Postby CalmBeforeStorm » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:15 pm

toad strangler wrote:
CalmBeforeStorm wrote:
tolakram wrote:
Because it's complete nonsense, almost like the GFS wants to win a popularity contest by showing something dramatic out in fantasy land. The GFS skill at that range is a little better than a blindfolded kid throwing darts at a map. :lol:

I agree that anything out that far is fantasy land but I don't agree that a synoptic setup at that range is impossible. Why is such a setup laughable synoptic ally? What's laughable about it?


This gigantic cyclone basically goes POOF after that crazy hook through Manhattan. I honestly chuckled. The entire cyclone just evaporates on the double.

#bogus

It's over land, moving quickly, colder temperatures. Many reasons for quick deintensification. Bottom line is I don't discount any model solutions because they are unusual because the records are full of unusual behaving storms.
0 likes   

User avatar
p1nheadlarry
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 672
Age: 33
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:42 pm
Location: SR County FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1475 Postby p1nheadlarry » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:17 pm

CalmBeforeStorm wrote:
p1nheadlarry wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:
Nonetheless, it's the trend westward that shouldn't be ignored. First, the Euro showing it dangerously close to Miami, and now this? I'd say we better start paying attention just in case


Though a ~920 mb hurricane hitting near OBX/VA Beach is quite crazy. It's just another model run without a closed center to initialize far out in time. The mesoscale/hurricane models especially have trouble interpreting the disturbance and nearby conditions of our ocean/atmosphere without this feat accomplished yet. Remember the HWRF with Hermine? It did fairly well, once it was a TD/TS that is.

I really don't think the models have much trouble with such well defined invests as 97l.


They sure don't in the Pacific. I guess Gaston was forecast pretty well too.
0 likes   
--;->#GoNoles--;->.

User avatar
TheDreamTraveler
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 641
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 3:10 am
Location: PA

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1476 Postby TheDreamTraveler » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:20 pm

meriland23 wrote:
TheDreamTraveler wrote:Wow just hooks it right into the northeast. I'm practically laughing at what the GFS is showing



It's not funny though, and there is a reason it is hooking NW in this run. There have been many instances where the GFS/EURO were initially correct 200+ hours out before changing it into the wrong outcome. So despite how unusual the run is, pay attention to the fact it did change in a way that somehow will likely affect us.


Oh don't get me wrong, if that run were to verify I'd be afraid if a cat 3/4 was barreling into the northeast. It's just one run out of many that actually showed this. And there's way too many variables on the table that could change the outcome. Even just a few days from now the entire solution might be way different. Say if it plows into Florida like the Euro is alluding to. Now if I start seeing this on the GFS on the 0z and 6z runs? Then I'll definitely take it a little more seriously.
Last edited by TheDreamTraveler on Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1477 Postby wxmann_91 » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:21 pm

toad strangler wrote:
CalmBeforeStorm wrote:
tolakram wrote:
Because it's complete nonsense, almost like the GFS wants to win a popularity contest by showing something dramatic out in fantasy land. The GFS skill at that range is a little better than a blindfolded kid throwing darts at a map. :lol:

I agree that anything out that far is fantasy land but I don't agree that a synoptic setup at that range is impossible. Why is such a setup laughable synoptic ally? What's laughable about it?


This gigantic cyclone basically goes POOF after that crazy hook through Manhattan. I honestly chuckled. The entire cyclone just evaporates on the double.

#bogus


It actually phases with the midlatitude cyclone and then occludes.

Not bogus physically per say (besides the whole staying at Cat 3/4 strength up the coast), but this solution is incredibly low-probability.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1478 Postby gatorcane » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:26 pm

GFS ensembles continue to trend toward the ECMWF with even more turning WNW into Florida in the Bahamas:

Image
Last edited by gatorcane on Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1479 Postby sma10 » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:27 pm

meriland23 wrote:
sma10 wrote:Okay. Regarding the 18Z GFS...I don't even know where to begin. Prior to it slamming into NYC at 933mb, it spends 3.5 days lumbering up the coast from the Bahamas at 915-925mb, basically 3 days of Cat 4/5 strength. The storm surge would be unimaginable, the destruction beyond catastrophic.

Will this happen? Not a chance.

But it would make a HELL of a great film.


I am curious as to what makes you so sure it wont happen? Like I would like to know why without a doubt you 'know' it wont.


Well, I may have overstated my case with "not a chance". Obviously, there is no one in the world who knows what will happen with 97L, myself included. Like many on this board, I have seen literally hundreds of modeled catastrophes over the years from 200+ hours out, and they just do not play out as modeled. But this particular one made me chuckle because it is perhaps THE VERY WORST case scenario I have ever personally seen in a model. In fact, it's so outrageous, that it looks like a Hollywood script for the worst disaster ever.

Hey, who knows - maybe this is the one. I suppose there will come a day that NYC will be hit directly by a Category 4 behemoth, that has been driving Category 5 whipped waves for 3 days ahead of it. I would just wait another 5-6 days yet before committing to this solution.
1 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1480 Postby wxmann_91 » Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:29 pm

sma10 wrote:
meriland23 wrote:
sma10 wrote:Okay. Regarding the 18Z GFS...I don't even know where to begin. Prior to it slamming into NYC at 933mb, it spends 3.5 days lumbering up the coast from the Bahamas at 915-925mb, basically 3 days of Cat 4/5 strength. The storm surge would be unimaginable, the destruction beyond catastrophic.

Will this happen? Not a chance.

But it would make a HELL of a great film.


I am curious as to what makes you so sure it wont happen? Like I would like to know why without a doubt you 'know' it wont.


Well, I may have overstated my case with "not a chance". Obviously, there is no one in the world who knows what will happen with 97L, myself included. Like many on this board, I have seen literally hundreds of modeled catastrophes over the years from 200+ hours out, and they just do not play out as modeled. But this particular one made me chuckle because it is perhaps THE VERY WORST case scenario I have ever personally seen in a model. In fact, it's so outrageous, that it looks like a Hollywood script for the worst disaster ever.

Hey, who knows - maybe this is the one. I suppose there will come a day that NYC will be hit directly by a Category 4 behemoth, that has been driving Category 5 whipped waves for 3 days ahead of it. I would just wait another 5-6 days yet before committing to this solution.


It's pretty crazy how this is almost *literally* the worst possible scenario for NYC that is modeled.

But forget about 5-6 days, this solution won't be there six hours from now.
0 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests