ATL: MATTHEW - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
USTropics
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2659
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1781 Postby USTropics » Wed Sep 28, 2016 9:52 am

ronjon wrote:NHC 5 day track forecast might be interesting at 11 am. let's see where they go with the models and in discussion.


5 day cone won't be took tricky for them, I'm going to guess they split the difference between the GFS and ECMWF, slightly leaning towards the ECMWF in timeframe. Cone ending 100-200 miles SE of Jamaica maybe.
0 likes   

rockyman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1967
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:24 pm
Location: Dauphin Island, AL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1782 Postby rockyman » Wed Sep 28, 2016 9:54 am

5 day forecast:

OUTLOOK VALID 03/1200Z 17.5N 76.5W
MAX WIND 90 KT...GUSTS 110 KT.

Just off southeastern tip of Jamaica, moving NNW (closer to N):

https://www.google.com/maps/vt/data=RfC ... s5a1mN3Yts
Last edited by rockyman on Wed Sep 28, 2016 9:57 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1783 Postby SouthFLTropics » Wed Sep 28, 2016 9:56 am

ronjon wrote:NHC 5 day track forecast might be interesting at 11 am. let's see where they go with the models and in discussion.


5 day forecast puts a 90 knot hurricane almost on top of Kingston Jamaica. 17.5N, 76.5W
0 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5478
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1784 Postby chaser1 » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:01 am

MississippiWx wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:
MississippiWx wrote:Some of y'all should stop by the Recon Discussion topic. 97L/trade wind combo are producing 64kt flight level winds. :eek:
yep but no defined closed center..if it was closed that would be a big deal


Makes no difference...it still has the same effect on the islands, closed circulation or not.


Wrong. With regards to modeling, properly initializing a COC does impact forecast output as it applies to track and synoptics. While conditions in the islands and their impact on those down there are very real, that in itself does not factor in the context of trying to determine where exactly a center is and the topic relating to model discussion and track forecast
1 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

User avatar
MississippiWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1699
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1785 Postby MississippiWx » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:05 am

chaser1 wrote:
MississippiWx wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:yep but no defined closed center..if it was closed that would be a big deal


Makes no difference...it still has the same effect on the islands, closed circulation or not.


Wrong. With regards to modeling, properly initializing a COC does impact forecast output as it applies to track and synoptics. While conditions in the islands and their impact on those down there are very real, that in itself does not factor in the context of trying to determine where exactly a center is and the topic relating to model discussion and track forecast


No. Not wrong. I'm not talking about tracking. I'm talking about real life conditions on the islands.

You're talking about a totally different topic.
2 likes   
This post is not an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of MississippiWx and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

USTropics
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2659
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1786 Postby USTropics » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:06 am

A center will be important for Jamaica now. All models improve in accuracy once true tropical genesis has occurred. The GFDL and HWRF in particular will have added value.
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4823
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1787 Postby ronjon » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:06 am

Probably the best track now by NHC with all the uncertainty - certainly leaves room to adjust with time. Appears to take the island of Hispanola off of a direct impact for now anyway.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7184
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1788 Postby jlauderdal » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:08 am

MississippiWx wrote:
chaser1 wrote:
MississippiWx wrote:
Makes no difference...it still has the same effect on the islands, closed circulation or not.


Wrong. With regards to modeling, properly initializing a COC does impact forecast output as it applies to track and synoptics. While conditions in the islands and their impact on those down there are very real, that in itself does not factor in the context of trying to determine where exactly a center is and the topic relating to model discussion and track forecast


No. Not wrong. I'm not talking about tracking. I'm talking about real life conditions on the islands.

You're talking about a totally different topic.
you are both right..time to move on
1 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4823
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1789 Postby ronjon » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:10 am

Splitting the baby for now.

For now, the NHC track
lies near a consensus of the faster GFS and slower ECMWF.
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1790 Postby WeatherEmperor » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:20 am

Would a stronger Matthew turn north faster and shift models right again later today?


Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1791 Postby Bocadude85 » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:24 am

WeatherEmperor wrote:Would a stronger Matthew turn north faster and shift models right again later today?


Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk


Its pretty close to the current strength(1008mb) that the models showed the system to be at when it was passing through the Islands.
0 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5478
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1792 Postby chaser1 » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:25 am

MississippiWx wrote:
chaser1 wrote:
MississippiWx wrote:
Makes no difference...it still has the same effect on the islands, closed circulation or not.


Wrong. With regards to modeling, properly initializing a COC does impact forecast output as it applies to track and synoptics. While conditions in the islands and their impact on those down there are very real, that in itself does not factor in the context of trying to determine where exactly a center is and the topic relating to model discussion and track forecast


No. Not wrong. I'm not talking about tracking. I'm talking about real life conditions on the islands.

You're talking about a totally different topic.


Please correct me if my Passport is incorrectly stamped but this IS the "MODEL Thread" correct? Because if I am wrong and this were the "DISCUSSION thread", than present conditions and storm impacts would certainly be quite relevant and your point well taken. Franks' comment as it applied to determining future course and anticipated forecast track was made in this thread which I understand (and post to) applies to the conversation specific to disseminating various model guidance & analysis of those atmospheric conditions which effect the modeling process. It is in this context that your comment "Makes no difference...it still has the same effect on the islands, closed circulation or not" , just as out of context as it would be if you made it in the 97L RECON DISCUSSION thread.
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

Vinnland
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:19 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1793 Postby Vinnland » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:26 am

12z GFS running now
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1794 Postby SouthFLTropics » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:28 am

Vinnland wrote:12z GFS running now


Is it just me or does it appear that the GFS initialized a hair too far north. Might be splitting hairs here but just looks that way to me.
0 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

User avatar
MississippiWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1699
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#1795 Postby MississippiWx » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:29 am

chaser1 wrote:
MississippiWx wrote:
chaser1 wrote:
Wrong. With regards to modeling, properly initializing a COC does impact forecast output as it applies to track and synoptics. While conditions in the islands and their impact on those down there are very real, that in itself does not factor in the context of trying to determine where exactly a center is and the topic relating to model discussion and track forecast


No. Not wrong. I'm not talking about tracking. I'm talking about real life conditions on the islands.

You're talking about a totally different topic.


Please correct me if my Passport is incorrectly stamped but this IS the "MODEL Thread" correct? Because if I am wrong and this were the "DISCUSSION thread", than present conditions and storm impacts would certainly be quite relevant and your point well taken. Franks' comment as it applied to determining future course and anticipated forecast track was made in this thread which I understand (and post to) applies to the conversation specific to disseminating various model guidance & analysis of those atmospheric conditions which effect the modeling process. It is in this context that your comment "Makes no difference...it still has the same effect on the islands, closed circulation or not" , just as out of context as it would be if you made it in the 97L RECON DISCUSSION thread.


Lol. Okay, pal. You're way overthinking this.

Moving on...
0 likes   
This post is not an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of MississippiWx and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1796 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:35 am

SouthFLTropics wrote:
Vinnland wrote:12z GFS running now


Is it just me or does it appear that the GFS initialized a hair too far north. Might be splitting hairs here but just looks that way to me.


Yes, it appears that way.
0 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1797 Postby Bocadude85 » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:36 am

SouthFLTropics wrote:
Vinnland wrote:12z GFS running now


Is it just me or does it appear that the GFS initialized a hair too far north. Might be splitting hairs here but just looks that way to me.


Through 24 hours the 12Z is slower and further northeast
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1798 Postby SouthFLTropics » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:36 am

GFS is much more north this run. Ridging looks weaker off to the NW. This might recurve faster this time.
0 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

Hamanard
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:14 pm
Location: Skidaway Island, GA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1799 Postby Hamanard » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:36 am

@30 stronger and north
1 likes   

OntarioEggplant
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:16 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1800 Postby OntarioEggplant » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:37 am

tarheelprogrammer wrote:
SouthFLTropics wrote:
Vinnland wrote:12z GFS running now


Is it just me or does it appear that the GFS initialized a hair too far north. Might be splitting hairs here but just looks that way to me.


Yes, it appears that way.


It's also that much if not further north through 30 hours. That incorrect initialization may result in this being a trash run.
0 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest