ATL: MATTHEW - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#2161 Postby Alyono » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:03 pm

ronjon wrote:
Frank2 wrote:The NOAA G-IV won't be flying for another 24 hours, but that would help refine things a bit. Considering Mathew seems to be ahead of schedule in strength, no doubt this might reinforce the right turn forecasts...


Didn't know that Frank but on TWC tonite they said the gulf stream jet was unavailable for Hermine due to corrosion problems with the plane that needed to be fixed. Now we know why the models were having a hard time....


There is a G-V but there were far more important things to fly, those being the 2 majors near Hawaii
1 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#2162 Postby ConvergenceZone » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:05 pm

Frank2 wrote:The NOAA G-IV won't be flying for another 24 hours, but that would help refine things a bit. Considering Mathew seems to be ahead of schedule in strength, no doubt this might reinforce the right turn forecasts...



I agree. Hopefully North Carolina and North is watching this very closely
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4825
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#2163 Postby ronjon » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:05 pm

GeneratorPower wrote:
ronjon wrote:Wxman57...so what's your point? I didn't follow your logic on the ensemble plots. One other point is that the GFS is about 200 miles north of the ECM in 3-4 days. GFDL, UKMET, and NAM also hug the coast of south america. Seems like if Matt stays further south, ridge is stronger and he goes more west before the turn. I think the models will settle down in a few days when they get the gulf stream IV data sampling in them.


His point is that the Gulf tracks are potentially flawed because of HOW the solutions are arrived at. Because science. He's saying the eastern solutions are more likely to be correct.


Because science?? LOL Please let him speak for himself.
1 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#2164 Postby Steve » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:09 pm

What I got from it was no ensembles showed Matthew crossing into the Gulf across Florida. I don't really care what the ensembles say yet longer range. But shorter range evolution will be getting better. Many models are sure of a straight north move. We will have to wait to see that as a completely legit option this time. It could be that the general motion is basically north, but I don't think it's just going to straight progress. Also,if it takes a Western Atlantic route offshore, there are liable to be some opportunities for stalls, loops and even west movement into the US coastline. But what if the shape of the ridge and upstream buffer air masses give it a WNW or NW bend? Florida and or the Gulf get hit. Bahamas seems most likely at the moment, but there could be a hard block. Temps here have been in the 90s, but we have a high of 80 on Friday. That's a big cold high rolling across. Matthew will be south of it, so what shape does it take as the frontal low pulls out followed by the cutoff? Nobody knows. I've been saying this weekend since last weekend and then even possibly as long as next Tuesday to have a solid idea. Only hedge would be a union of the globals and consistency for 3 or 4 runs. Then we should know sooner.
1 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#2165 Postby SFLcane » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:10 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
jason1912
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 8:24 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#2166 Postby jason1912 » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:11 pm

Frank2 wrote:The NOAA G-IV won't be flying for another 24 hours, but that would help refine things a bit. Considering Mathew seems to be ahead of schedule in strength, no doubt this might reinforce the right turn forecasts...

Agree with this very much.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23692
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#2167 Postby gatorcane » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:12 pm

12Z JMA animation:
Image
Last edited by gatorcane on Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
centuryv58
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 233
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 1:24 pm
Location: Southeast Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#2168 Postby centuryv58 » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:22 pm

gatorcane wrote:12Z JMA animation:
Image


JB used the JMA as one of his supports earlier today. Don't know enough about it to say how accurate it is though.
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4825
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#2169 Postby ronjon » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:24 pm

Gatorcane..interesting that the JMA makes the turn more N-NW thru the peninsula. Thinking if the GFDL run went longer, might show the same thing. Another model that hugs the south American coast....Hmmm....
0 likes   

BobHarlem
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2187
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:11 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#2170 Postby BobHarlem » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:27 pm

0z Early model guidence shifted a bit right/east, i suspect the GFS will also, still a lot of uncertainty that far out, but I'm still leaning toward staying east of Florida. Mid Atlantic up to Canada, though...
1 likes   

User avatar
chris_fit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3237
Age: 42
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:58 pm
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#2171 Postby chris_fit » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:27 pm

That JMA run looks awfully suspicious, almost as if it was initialized WAY south of the actual center.
0 likes   

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#2172 Postby TheStormExpert » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:28 pm

The 12z JMA initialized Matthew too far south to begin with.
0 likes   

User avatar
CDO62
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:19 pm
Location: Tampa,FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#2173 Postby CDO62 » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:33 pm



I'm curious to know the historic accuracy of this model.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23692
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#2174 Postby gatorcane » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:39 pm

TheStormExpert wrote:The 12z JMA initialized Matthew too far south to begin with.


But look at the "thumb" ridge that builds back in the SW Atlantic
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22987
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#2175 Postby wxman57 » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:41 pm

ronjon wrote:Wxman57...so what's your point? I didn't follow your logic on the ensemble plots. One other point is that the GFS is about 200 miles north of the ECM in 3-4 days. GFDL, UKMET, and NAM also hug the coast of south america. Seems like if Matt stays further south, ridge is stronger and he goes more west before the turn. I think the models will settle down in a few days when they get the gulf stream IV data sampling in them.


My thought was that the more westerly EC ensembles would all be with a weaker storm. However, that didn't turn out to be the case. I'm not sure why so many members are west of Florida.
1 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23692
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#2176 Postby gatorcane » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:45 pm

12Z NASA model shows quite a WSW dive with a turn NNW by day 5:

Image

You can find the model here if you want to animate the run:

http://portal.nccs.nasa.gov/cgi-fp/fp_w ... =0&tau=120
Last edited by gatorcane on Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
robbielyn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1298
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 9:45 am
Location: brooksville, fl

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#2177 Postby robbielyn » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:45 pm

maybe if the storms slows way down it will miss the trough allowing the ridge to build back in per Levi cowan? just a amateur guess.
0 likes   
Robbielyn McCrary
I know just about enough to sound like I know what I'm talking about sometimes. But for your safety please follow the nhc for truly professional forecasting. :D

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#2178 Postby Ken711 » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:45 pm

wxman57 wrote:
ronjon wrote:Wxman57...so what's your point? I didn't follow your logic on the ensemble plots. One other point is that the GFS is about 200 miles north of the ECM in 3-4 days. GFDL, UKMET, and NAM also hug the coast of south america. Seems like if Matt stays further south, ridge is stronger and he goes more west before the turn. I think the models will settle down in a few days when they get the gulf stream IV data sampling in them.


My thought was that the more westerly EC ensembles would all be with a weaker storm. However, that didn't turn out to be the case. I'm not sure why so many members are west of Florida.


Thanks for the explanation and the ensemble plot charts.
1 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#2179 Postby Steve » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:45 pm

CDO62 wrote:


I'm curious to know the historic accuracy of this model.


I haven't looked at verification on it because I just started following it the last couple of years. It's like the rest of them in that it gets some things right. Its monthly/seasonal forecasts are respectable, and it's known to be very conservative with showing tropical genesis.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#2180 Postby wxmann_91 » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:59 pm

centuryv58 wrote:
gatorcane wrote:12Z JMA animation:

JB used the JMA as one of his supports earlier today. Don't know enough about it to say how accurate it is though.


JMA is just about as useful as the CMC and NOGAPS. Maybe better than NAM, or the BAM suite, or LBAR. Not sure why JB is using the JMA.
0 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests