ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145512
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1361 Postby cycloneye » Thu Sep 29, 2016 3:50 pm

emeraldislenc wrote:The 5 pm advisory will be interesting


Go to the Advisories thread.

viewtopic.php?f=59&t=118367&p=2546993#p2546993
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4234
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1362 Postby abajan » Thu Sep 29, 2016 3:50 pm

Convection really bombing. Should be interesting to see how it evolves overnight:

Image
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7184
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1363 Postby jlauderdal » Thu Sep 29, 2016 3:55 pm

Alyono wrote:
cycloneye wrote:Peak intensity is up to 90kts at 5 PM.

72H 02/1800Z 15.7N 75.1W 90 KT 105 MPH
96H 03/1800Z 18.6N 75.5W 90 KT 105 MPH


laughably too low.

You're telling me that over waters with heat content higher than the Philippine Sea with less than 10 kts of shear, this is not going to rapidly intensify?

Only way that happens is if the shear forecasts are wrong. That is possible as they have already been wrong once. But if the shear decreases as NHC says, this will explode


You predicting RI?
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1364 Postby Alyono » Thu Sep 29, 2016 3:57 pm

jlauderdal wrote:
Alyono wrote:
cycloneye wrote:Peak intensity is up to 90kts at 5 PM.

72H 02/1800Z 15.7N 75.1W 90 KT 105 MPH
96H 03/1800Z 18.6N 75.5W 90 KT 105 MPH


laughably too low.

You're telling me that over waters with heat content higher than the Philippine Sea with less than 10 kts of shear, this is not going to rapidly intensify?

Only way that happens is if the shear forecasts are wrong. That is possible as they have already been wrong once. But if the shear decreases as NHC says, this will explode


You predicting RI?


if the shear drops on Sunday as it should, this is a shoe in to rapidly intensify, or perhaps even explosively intensify
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1365 Postby Dean4Storms » Thu Sep 29, 2016 3:59 pm

This is way ahead of the forecast points to this point, Mathew better slow down soon or it is going to be much further west before that ridge begins to erode.
0 likes   

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1366 Postby Ken711 » Thu Sep 29, 2016 4:02 pm

Dean4Storms wrote:This is way ahead of the forecast points to this point, Mathew better slow down soon or it is going to be much further west before that ridge begins to erode.


What would the longer track implications be?
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1367 Postby SouthFLTropics » Thu Sep 29, 2016 4:03 pm

Tonight's overnight hours are going to be very interesting in regards to model watching and actual storm watching. The development trend upward in strength is eye opening. Business is definitely picking up!!!
0 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

Raebie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 822
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 8:00 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1368 Postby Raebie » Thu Sep 29, 2016 4:04 pm

Ken711 wrote:
Dean4Storms wrote:This is way ahead of the forecast points to this point, Mathew better slow down soon or it is going to be much further west before that ridge begins to erode.


What would the longer track implications be?


My guess would be Florida would possibly be in play and a definite threat to the EC.
1 likes   

User avatar
FireRat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1246
Age: 38
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 11:38 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1369 Postby FireRat » Thu Sep 29, 2016 4:04 pm

That is scary as heck Alyono!

About the pressure everyone, I think it could be higher than usual due to the lower latitude maybe? I think the same happened with Haiyan in 2013 who had insane winds but a pressure not as low as other weaker windwise typhoons.
0 likes   
Georges '98, Irene '99, Frances '04, Jeanne '04, Katrina '05, Wilma '05, Gustav '08, Isaac '12, Matthew '16, Florence '18, Michael '18, Ian '22

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1370 Postby Ken711 » Thu Sep 29, 2016 4:05 pm

What was the strongest hurricane to track up the Atlantic coastline this time of year?
0 likes   

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4769
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1371 Postby psyclone » Thu Sep 29, 2016 4:06 pm

Say what you will about the models lurching around...one thing that isn't lurching around so much is the NHC's official track. It has consistently implied a substantial threat to Jamaica, Eastern Cuba, Haiti and the Bahamas. It reminds me very much of Hermine which also was fairly consistent despite all the noise. It would also seem to continue to imply a very low risk to Florida at this point in time.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7184
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1372 Postby jlauderdal » Thu Sep 29, 2016 4:08 pm

psyclone wrote:Say what you will about the models lurching around...one thing that isn't lurching around so much is the NHC's official track. It has consistently implied a substantial threat to Jamaica, Eastern Cuba, Haiti and the Bahamas. It reminds me very much of Hermine which also was fairly consistent despite all the noise. It would also seem to continue to imply a very low risk to Florida at this point in time.
the the easy part is through sunday/monday so no reason for them to deviate too much..intensity forecast as always is much more difficult even through 5 days
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1373 Postby Dean4Storms » Thu Sep 29, 2016 4:08 pm

Ken711 wrote:
Dean4Storms wrote:This is way ahead of the forecast points to this point, Mathew better slow down soon or it is going to be much further west before that ridge begins to erode.


What would the longer track implications be?


The turn would occur further west which begins to put FL into play on its northward track. Remember to this point models have been forecasting the ridge to its north without Recon Flight Obs being fed into them extending only to about where their current solutions turn it north. If Mathew continues past that general consensus of the turn it would mean the Ridge extends further Westward than the models calculated, a possibility!
2 likes   

User avatar
AtlanticWind
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1890
Age: 66
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 9:57 pm
Location: Plantation,Fla

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1374 Postby AtlanticWind » Thu Sep 29, 2016 4:10 pm

psyclone wrote:Say what you will about the models lurching around...one thing that isn't lurching around so much is the NHC's official track. It has consistently implied a substantial threat to Jamaica, Eastern Cuba, Haiti and the Bahamas. It reminds me very much of Hermine which also was fairly consistent despite all the noise. It would also seem to continue to imply a very low risk to Florida at this point in time.

They hurricane center pointed out in Their discussion that the 72 to 120 hour forecasts are subject to error. A possible threat to
Florida is in the 140 hour area ,too early yet to assess the risk .
0 likes   

Raebie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 822
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 8:00 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1375 Postby Raebie » Thu Sep 29, 2016 4:11 pm

Dean4Storms wrote:
Ken711 wrote:
Dean4Storms wrote:This is way ahead of the forecast points to this point, Mathew better slow down soon or it is going to be much further west before that ridge begins to erode.


What would the longer track implications be?


The turn would occur further west which begins to put FL into play on its northward track. Remember to this point models have been forecasting the ridge to its north without Recon Flight Obs being fed into them extending only to about where their current solutions turn it north. If Mathew continues past that general consensus of the turn it would mean the Ridge extends further Westward than the models calculated, a possibility!


I was right!! What do I win?
:D
3 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7184
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1376 Postby jlauderdal » Thu Sep 29, 2016 4:14 pm

Raebie wrote:
Ken711 wrote:
Dean4Storms wrote:This is way ahead of the forecast points to this point, Mathew better slow down soon or it is going to be much further west before that ridge begins to erode.


What would the longer track implications be?


My guess would be Florida would possibly be in play and a definite threat to the EC.


it wouldnt take much more ridging to push the system into the usa per the current gfs and euro...nobody is off the hook...if you asked the nhc to make a 7 day forecast they would be in the central bahamas and the usa is well within that error rate
0 likes   

Bailey1777
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 962
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:23 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1377 Postby Bailey1777 » Thu Sep 29, 2016 4:16 pm

Question, Matthew is moving at 17 mph and is supposed to keep west or just south of west for the next 48 hours..that would put it 817 miles west of where it is now, can somebody with the tools show where this would be on the map please.
0 likes   

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4234
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1378 Postby abajan » Thu Sep 29, 2016 4:22 pm

Bailey1777 wrote:Question, Matthew is moving at 17 mph and is supposed to keep west or just south of west for the next 48 hours..that would put it 817 miles west of where it is now, can somebody with the tools show where this would be on the map please.

It would be 817 miles west of its current location if it kept moving at 17 mph, which isn't necessarily the case.
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1379 Postby Bocadude85 » Thu Sep 29, 2016 4:22 pm

Looks like the 5pm track is just an update of the 11am track, they are east of the 18z consensus models. I guess they are going to wait and see if this westward shift sticks before tweaking the track closer to or over Jamaica.
0 likes   

snowpocalypse
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 7:24 pm
Location: GA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1380 Postby snowpocalypse » Thu Sep 29, 2016 4:23 pm

Bailey1777 wrote:Question, Matthew is moving at 17 mph and is supposed to keep west or just south of west for the next 48 hours..that would put it 817 miles west of where it is now, can somebody with the tools show where this would be on the map please.


NHC forecast 48H is 13.7N 73.7W
0 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest