caneman wrote:NDG wrote:tolakram wrote:
I disagree. It's doesn't kill storms, it delays development. The fact Matthew entered the Caribbean pretty far north helped a lot in my opinion. Once a storm has formed there's no evidence that the inflow off of SA does anything.
Is the low level easterly jet over the central & eastern Caribbean Sea which creates surface divergence, nothing to do with the downslopping winds off of the Mountains, IMO.
I disagree with this. Because it was formed already those things had less impact. Very rarely if ever will a system form in that area, I believe due to those down sloping winds. Maybe an expert can chime in but in my many years of watching these things, the South American affect is real in newly developing systems.
If anything, getting closer to South America helped Matthew strengthen, staying away from the low level jet over the middle of the Caribbean Sea between Hispaniola & S.A., that's the real killer, not down slopping winds from the S.A. Mountains, IMO.
Felix '07 did the same thing, I remember many forecasters back then calling it to weaken or not strengthen much because of "downslopping winds off of the S.A. mountains but it also went over rapid intensification in this same general area.










...but there's just nothing showing a likely scenario that involves a landfalling hurricane on the east coast. Every model run makes it more and more likely Matthew stays hundreds of miles to the east. And with Matthew's more southerly track, instead of more westerly track that he's taken this morning... I would assume that when the north movement begins, he won't be able to get as far west as earlier models. So I would think (not a forecast) that 12z models are more east?