ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
centuryv58
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 233
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 1:24 pm
Location: Southeast Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1921 Postby centuryv58 » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:04 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:remember until the magical upper low thats supposed to form in the eastern gulf materializes its all fair game roughly in 48 hours that feature should begin to show up helping to drive it northward. if not or its farther west then matthew will also go farther west


I'll take magic about now.
1 likes   

User avatar
p1nheadlarry
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 672
Age: 33
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:42 pm
Location: SR County FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1922 Postby p1nheadlarry » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:05 pm

RL3AO wrote:


Likely gravity waves from Matthew. Fairly typical with strong convection.


Wait, the same waves Einstein predicted that we just confirmed six-seven months ago?
1 likes   
--;->#GoNoles--;->.

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4237
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1923 Postby SouthFLTropics » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:07 pm

Just a couple of benchmarks to keep in mind here for any potential future impacts to the East Coast of Florida. Coming from an old school native Floridian guy like myself, back in the day we used to watch where a storm would impact to get a feel for the potential impacts down the road. For storms coming from the South the first benchmark would be Jamaica and the second would be Andros Island. If it passes left of either or both of those then the chance for an East Coast Florida impact go up. If it is to the right of either of them then chances are down. Split the middle and then it's 50/50. I'll be watching very carefully to see where this impacts Jamaica.
4 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20012
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1924 Postby tolakram » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:08 pm

Plane now reporting a closed wall.

Image
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1925 Postby RL3AO » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:12 pm

p1nheadlarry wrote:
RL3AO wrote:


Likely gravity waves from Matthew. Fairly typical with strong convection.


Wait, the same waves Einstein predicted that we just confirmed six-seven months ago?


Not those gravity waves. These are waves that can form when you have a stable layer (which in this case would be the tropopause). They're quite evident when you see strong convection in 1-min satellite imagery.
0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11504
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1926 Postby GCANE » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:12 pm

4C Warm Core from the latest Vortex Message

Transmitted: 30th day of the month at 17:55Z

A. Time of Center Fix: 30th day of the month at 17:35:58Z
B. Center Fix Coordinates: 13°32'N 71°16'W (13.5333N 71.2667W)
H. Minimum Sea Level Pressure: 961mb (28.38 inHg)

I. Maximum Flight Level Temp & Pressure Altitude Outside Eye: 15°C (59°F) at a pressure alt. of 2,377m (7,799ft)
J. Maximum Flight Level Temp & Pressure Altitude Inside Eye: 19°C (66°F) at a pressure alt. of 2,659m (8,724ft)
0 likes   

Wakeknight
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 7:37 am
Location: Nokomis, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1927 Postby Wakeknight » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:18 pm

2 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1928 Postby RL3AO » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:27 pm

Wakeknight wrote:Thought this was interesting...


The cutoff low in the GOM is an important feature. Worth sampling the area.
0 likes   

Wakeknight
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 7:37 am
Location: Nokomis, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1929 Postby Wakeknight » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:28 pm

RL3AO wrote:
Wakeknight wrote:Thought this was interesting...


The cutoff low in the GOM is an important feature. Worth sampling the area.


Does the need to sample reflect a lack of confidence in the modeling of this low?
1 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1930 Postby Aric Dunn » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:33 pm

109kt FL
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1931 Postby KWT » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:35 pm

I think at this point the more data the better for the models which have clearly struggled with this system so far. Any small trend west from here is going to have big implications for the real life weather in E.Florida, landfall or not.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1932 Postby Aric Dunn » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:35 pm

and 956mb with 45kt.. missed the center looks like pressure has fallen 4 or 5 mb in the last 45 minutes.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1933 Postby TheStormExpert » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:41 pm

0 likes   

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1934 Postby Michele B » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:42 pm

It seems to me storms in the Caribbean DO tend to gain strength to Cat 4 or 5, and then generally back off after a day or two. I'm not so much worried about its strength right now, it's still pretty far away from any landmass.

That said, I'm sending up prayers for those folks in Jamaica. Hope it doesn't do a landfall there.....my God.....

:cry:
0 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022

User avatar
Buck
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1174
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1935 Postby Buck » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:43 pm

Wow, the Bahamas seeing such a serious threat almost exactly 1 year after Joaquin... crazy.

Also, surprised at how conservative the NHC has been with forecasting intensification. I get being cautious and not forecasting it to be stronger than necessary so as not to cause panic, etc... but they've really been under. Interested to see what the discussion at 5PM is.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1936 Postby Aric Dunn » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:46 pm

what is recon doing ?>

they are just flying around in the eyewall.. in circles lol
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1937 Postby Michele B » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:47 pm

jdjaguar wrote:
JaxGator wrote:
Michele B wrote:
No. Means more strengthening.


I know that. Should have worded it differently but the words "not good" should be enough to imply it's strengthening.

they should, but as strange as it may sound to people like you and I who live in hurricane zones, there are posters who are actually disappointed
if a storm doesn't strengthen.


I sincerely hope this statement wasn't directed at me. I was simply clarifying what I THOUGHT I understood from this post. I mean, I thought Jax was saying it wasn't looking good for the hurricane....

Sorry if I gave the impression that I am happy that it's strengthening, cause I live in hurricane-land, too and I am NOT going to be happy to see it continue to struggle.

I'm new around here, guys, so I guess I don't always catch the nuances of your posts!

:P
Last edited by Michele B on Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20012
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1938 Postby tolakram » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:48 pm

0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

ronyan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 791
Age: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:46 pm
Location: Lake Jackson, TX

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1939 Postby ronyan » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:48 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:what is recon doing ?>

they are just flying around in the eyewall.. in circles lol


Maintaining altitude I hope...
1 likes   

jdjaguar
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: Jacksonville Beach, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1940 Postby jdjaguar » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:51 pm

Michele B wrote:
jdjaguar wrote:
JaxGator wrote:
I know that. Should have worded it differently but the words "not good" should be enough to imply it's strengthening.

they should, but as strange as it may sound to people like you and I who live in hurricane zones, there are posters who are actually disappointed
if a storm doesn't strengthen.


I sincerely hope this statement wasn't directed at me. I was simply clarifying what I THOUGHT I understood from this post. I mean, I thought Jax was saying it wasn't looking for for the hurricane....

Sorry if I gave the impression that I am happy that it's strengthening, cause I live in hurricane-land, too and I am NOT going to be happy to see it continue to struggle.

I'm new around here, guys, so I guess I don't always catch the nuances of your posts!

:P

that statement was in no way directed at you, or any specific individual. just something I've noticed when storms start approaching CONUS.
It has been a long time since we had a major threaten our coasts.
Peace
1 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests