ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
they must be enjoying themselves flying around in the eye so much lol
anyway.. 125 to 130 mph..
still think cat 4 by 11pm
193830 1334N 07112W 7708 02074 9802 +153 //// 167101 104 084 013 01
193900 1334N 07114W 7674 02074 9802 +155 //// 164107 109 095 025 01
193930 1334N 07116W 7629 02074 9802 +152 //// 165109 112 104 026 01
anyway.. 125 to 130 mph..
still think cat 4 by 11pm
193830 1334N 07112W 7708 02074 9802 +153 //// 167101 104 084 013 01
193900 1334N 07114W 7674 02074 9802 +155 //// 164107 109 095 025 01
193930 1334N 07116W 7629 02074 9802 +152 //// 165109 112 104 026 01
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
BobHarlem wrote:New vortex at 954mb (Drop From the 2PM advisory at 960mb)
Still deepening it seems, very impressive day of strengthening from Matthew. Been a while since a hurricane pulled this sort of strengthening in the deep tropics.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
- 1900hurricane
- Category 5
- Posts: 6059
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
- Contact:
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Cunxi Huang wrote:BobHarlem wrote:New vortex at 954mb (Drop From the 2PM advisory at 960mb)
that's EXTRAP which means it's an estimation...
They did list the extrapolated pressure in the Vortex Data Message though. Looks like they've prioritized getting eyewall wind data from flight level and SFMR over dropsonde eye pressures this mission.
0 likes
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.
Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/
Opinions expressed are mine alone.
Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:16 am
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Btw, is anyone else amazed at how close the FL winds and SFMR winds are? Seems like less than the typical reduction.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Still rapidily intensifying. pressure 949 with 20 kts of wind.. likely 946 ish or so..
thats 15 mb in 2 two hours.
thats 15 mb in 2 two hours.
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote:Still rapidily intensifying. pressure 949 with 20 kts of wind.. likely 946 ish or so..
thats 15 mb in 2 two hours.
Thanks, recon thread is not being updated currently.
0 likes
- Kazmit
- Category 5
- Posts: 2125
- Age: 22
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
- Location: Williamsburg, VA / Bermuda
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
ronyan wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:Still rapidily intensifying. pressure 949 with 20 kts of wind.. likely 946 ish or so..
thats 15 mb in 2 two hours.
Thanks, recon thread is not being updated currently.
949 mbar makes Matthew the strongest storm of the season. I think this'll become a Cat 4 tonight.
0 likes
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019
I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
OntarioEggplant wrote:Btw, is anyone else amazed at how close the FL winds and SFMR winds are? Seems like less than the typical reduction.
When you've got explosive strengthening like we seem to have at the moment, quite often the FL winds are brought close to the surface which would explain why the winds are quite close.
Now time for a poll of thoughts....what is Matthew's bottom pressure in this round of strengthening?
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
- 1900hurricane
- Category 5
- Posts: 6059
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
- Contact:
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
OntarioEggplant wrote:Btw, is anyone else amazed at how close the FL winds and SFMR winds are? Seems like less than the typical reduction.
I've observed that intensifying storms, especially those that are bombing out, oftentimes have SFMR wind observations higher than what would typically be expected from a standard .9 ratio from flight level winds. Megi '10 and Patricia '15, two storms the explosively intensified to well below 900 mb, actually had near 1:1 ratios between flight level and SFMR at times.
0 likes
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.
Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/
Opinions expressed are mine alone.
Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
welll we should have a cat 4 at 5pm
194600 1342N 07124W 7591 02121 9539 +152 //// 104114 121 113 024 01
194630 1344N 07124W 7615 02121 9539 +144 //// 102117 120 103 059 01
194700 1346N 07124W 7669 02121 9539 +145 //// 102112 115 091 045 01
194730 1348N 07124W 7688 02121 9539 +145 //// 095105 107 078 045 01
well darn close but givien the continued RI.. 145 at 11pm is possible.
194600 1342N 07124W 7591 02121 9539 +152 //// 104114 121 113 024 01
194630 1344N 07124W 7615 02121 9539 +144 //// 102117 120 103 059 01
194700 1346N 07124W 7669 02121 9539 +145 //// 102112 115 091 045 01
194730 1348N 07124W 7688 02121 9539 +145 //// 095105 107 078 045 01
well darn close but givien the continued RI.. 145 at 11pm is possible.
Last edited by Aric Dunn on Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
- Emmett_Brown
- Category 5
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
- Location: Sarasota FL
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Just eyeballing the Vis loop, it seems like the long awaited slow down is happening.
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
It certainly appears to my untrained eye like it is starting to bottom out in its motion southwest and is making the turn west.
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote:welll we should have a cat 4 at 5pm
194600 1342N 07124W 7591 02121 9539 +152 //// 104114 121 113 024 01
194630 1344N 07124W 7615 02121 9539 +144 //// 102117 120 103 059 01
194700 1346N 07124W 7669 02121 9539 +145 //// 102112 115 091 045 01
194730 1348N 07124W 7688 02121 9539 +145 //// 095105 107 078 045 01
well darn close but givien the continued RI.. 145 at 11pm is possible.
Yeah looks like enough evidence there to go with 115kts, especially given it is strengthening at a decent rate anyway, so if its not 100% there now, it'll be there by advisory time you'd have to think.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
A beast in the making...I'll go with Cat 4 by this evening, we will probably wake up to something amazing tomorrow.
0 likes
Georges '98, Irene '99, Frances '04, Jeanne '04, Katrina '05, Wilma '05, Gustav '08, Isaac '12, Matthew '16, Florence '18, Michael '18, Ian '22
- TheDreamTraveler
- Category 2
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 3:10 am
- Location: PA
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote:welll we should have a cat 4 at 5pm
194600 1342N 07124W 7591 02121 9539 +152 //// 104114 121 113 024 01
194630 1344N 07124W 7615 02121 9539 +144 //// 102117 120 103 059 01
194700 1346N 07124W 7669 02121 9539 +145 //// 102112 115 091 045 01
194730 1348N 07124W 7688 02121 9539 +145 //// 095105 107 078 045 01
well darn close but givien the continued RI.. 145 at 11pm is possible.
Definitely. Wouldn't be surprised if it made a run to cat 5 before it gets near land. Really horrible situation no matter what.
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Considering the extremely favorable conditions, immense slowdown, quick RI, and the significant amount of time that Matthew has in the Atlantic, could the first Cat 5 we've had in 9 years be in immediate reach? This could easily bomb out to a Cat 4 tonight, and it's forecasted to stay over water for another day or two, so it has the time considering it's current rate of intensification imo.
0 likes
- 1900hurricane
- Category 5
- Posts: 6059
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
- Contact:
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
1900hurricane wrote:ADT is now responding to the emerging IR eye too. Additionally, SATCON is on the rise. Based on objective measurements and trends from geostationary satellite, polar orbiting satellites, and recon, I wouldn't be surprised to see something like 115 kt/948 mb by 00Z.
Looks like I wasn't aggressive enough.
0 likes
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.
Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/
Opinions expressed are mine alone.
Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/
- Yellow Evan
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 16169
- Age: 27
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
- Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
- Contact:
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Rain rate for the 113 knots is higher than I'd like, but is less of a big deal at past intensities. Also matches up well with past FL/SFMR ratios.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests