ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3841 Postby sma10 » Sun Oct 02, 2016 8:59 pm

tgenius wrote:Well for what it's worth, the local news in Miami (Channel 10) is basically writing off the storm for down here, which given all the models I guess makes sense. We may get a little wind and some rain (if that) but otherwise not too much.


I say this with love, but the last place you want to go for accurate forecasts is local TV. I gave that up back in the 90s.
1 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3842 Postby SFLcane » Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:00 pm

I think something that has not been talked about is whst structural this hurricane will be once crossing those big mountains in Cuba. Core may very well expand.
0 likes   

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4544
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3843 Postby toad strangler » Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:01 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
toad strangler wrote:
SouthFLTropics wrote:
I agree with your timing Aric but I'm not so sure about the 200 miles further west...


More like 50 miles W and WELL within the 3 day cone.


so worked it out best I could find.. looks like 100 miles.. :P



Take that map by scale, the distance Matthew went West of forecast points is roughly half the width of the Florida peninsula. Probably about 50 miles. I would say we are just splitting hairs, but we aren't when it comes to talking about TC movement.
Last edited by toad strangler on Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3844 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:01 pm

SFLcane wrote:Aric so exactly what are you implying?


just that the models have been constantly off and cannot be taken seriously in even the short term right now beyond a general sense. models have been unable to reconcile synoptic setup or evolution or get a 6 hour movement or intensity on a coherent basis.. lol
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

otowntiger
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1923
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3845 Postby otowntiger » Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:01 pm

psyclone wrote:
Evenstar wrote:
psyclone wrote:Stubborn Matthew still wants to rack up longitude...still think this stands a decent chance to shoot the uprights (between Jamaica and the Tiburon peninsula)..another thing of note..once again arc clouds could be seen today firing out the western side of the storm. that would seem to imply dry air remains out that way and while it doesn't seem to have inhibited the storm that possibility remains. conversely the eastern side remains juicy and while the convective goiter has shrank from last night's enormous size it remains very much intact. it looks to be an issue not only for Haiti but at least western portions of the DR as well...it may actually expand eastward thanks to orographic enhancement. a very dangerous situation for Hispaniola even east of the threat of high sustained winds.


I'm fairly confident this is the first time in human history that the words "convective" and "goiter" have been used together in the same sentence.

I've often thought I should start keeping a journal of the most memorable and/or funniest moments on Storm2k. Convective goiter would go in the Storm2k terminology index under the heading: Weather Witticisms

I couldn't figure out what to call so it was time to coin a new phrase. I know it's impolite to stare...but you just can't help it (at least I can't)...it's a fascinating oddity.

Before I read your post I was thinking it was like a 'goiter' too. :P
2 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23692
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3846 Postby gatorcane » Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:02 pm

While Matthew has stalled, the players that would influence his track once he eventually gets to the Bahamas are definitely on the move. That stalled cutoff low that was over Kentucky for days last week is filling in and on the way out, the big question is how fast does it get out of the picture and where will Matthew be?

Image
Last edited by gatorcane on Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3847 Postby WeatherEmperor » Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:03 pm

sma10 wrote:
tgenius wrote:Well for what it's worth, the local news in Miami (Channel 10) is basically writing off the storm for down here, which given all the models I guess makes sense. We may get a little wind and some rain (if that) but otherwise not too much.


I say this with love, but the last place you want to go for accurate forecasts is local TV. I gave that up back in the 90s.


Former NHC director Max Mayfield is part of the hurricane coverage team for Channel 10 so they pretty much are the real deal.


Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk
0 likes   

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3848 Postby Ken711 » Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:04 pm

SFLcane wrote:I think something that has not been talked about is whst structural this hurricane will be once crossing those big mountains in Cuba. Core may very well expand.


Would the wind field increase and the intensity decrease?
0 likes   

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4544
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3849 Postby toad strangler » Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:05 pm

WeatherEmperor wrote:
sma10 wrote:
tgenius wrote:Well for what it's worth, the local news in Miami (Channel 10) is basically writing off the storm for down here, which given all the models I guess makes sense. We may get a little wind and some rain (if that) but otherwise not too much.


I say this with love, but the last place you want to go for accurate forecasts is local TV. I gave that up back in the 90s.


Former NHC director Max Mayfield is part of the hurricane coverage team for Channel 10 so they pretty much are the real deal.



The real deal and writing off this kind of stalled system? LOL ... I mean they might be 100% correct in the end. But, no real deal Met outfit is writing anything off with the current status..
2 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3850 Postby SFLcane » Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:07 pm

Aric But at the end of the day, we can look at all of these things, but a hurricane will do what it wants to do. Tropical systems are just so unique.
0 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3851 Postby SFLcane » Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:07 pm

Last 5 frames on satellite imagery has the storm east of 75W. Maybe new motion has begun. Actually was forecast to do anyway.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4239
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3852 Postby SouthFLTropics » Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:08 pm

gatorcane wrote:While Matthew has stalled, the players that would influence his track once he eventually gets to the Bahamas are definitely on the move. That stalled cutoff low that was over Kentucky for days last week is filling in and on the way out, the big question is how fast does it get out of the picture and where will Matthew be?

Image


The potential ramifications of this evidence cannot be understated. The delay out of the Caribbean has big implications on the future track.
2 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3853 Postby WeatherEmperor » Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:08 pm

toad strangler wrote:
WeatherEmperor wrote:
sma10 wrote:
I say this with love, but the last place you want to go for accurate forecasts is local TV. I gave that up back in the 90s.


Former NHC director Max Mayfield is part of the hurricane coverage team for Channel 10 so they pretty much are the real deal.



The real deal and writing off this kind of stalled system? LOL ... I mean they might be 100% correct in the end. But, no real deal Met outfit is writing anything off with the current status..


You need to get your facts straight. They never wrote it off. They simply said that a direct landfall is highly unlikely and chances of significant impacts are going down.


Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk
0 likes   

SapphireSea
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:13 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3854 Postby SapphireSea » Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:09 pm

Ken711 wrote:
SFLcane wrote:I think something that has not been talked about is whst structural this hurricane will be once crossing those big mountains in Cuba. Core may very well expand.


Would the wind field increase and the intensity decrease?


It would expand some yes. However the winds overall will weaken as gradient slackens some. So for Florida, if it retains Cat 4-5 with tight core, 200 Miles East would translate to low POP due to subsidence and mild breeze. Heat Index probobly in 100-110s. If it becomes ragged and expands then 200 Miles East could mean 30kt winds, and much more rain. Once it gains latitude it depends on environment around, if it becomes shared and assymetric OBX can easily get Hur Winds if the approch is within 150 miles. But this is all just conjecture. Have to see what Matt does nearer to cuba first.
1 likes   

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4544
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3855 Postby toad strangler » Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:09 pm

WeatherEmperor wrote:
toad strangler wrote:
WeatherEmperor wrote:
Former NHC director Max Mayfield is part of the hurricane coverage team for Channel 10 so they pretty much are the real deal.



The real deal and writing off this kind of stalled system? LOL ... I mean they might be 100% correct in the end. But, no real deal Met outfit is writing anything off with the current status..


You need to get your facts straight. They never wrote it off. They simply said that a direct landfall is highly unlikely and chances of significant impacts are going down.


Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk


YOU said "basically wrote it off" So, do tell me more about getting facts straight.
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3856 Postby WeatherEmperor » Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:10 pm

toad strangler wrote:
WeatherEmperor wrote:
toad strangler wrote:

The real deal and writing off this kind of stalled system? LOL ... I mean they might be 100% correct in the end. But, no real deal Met outfit is writing anything off with the current status..


You need to get your facts straight. They never wrote it off. They simply said that a direct landfall is highly unlikely and chances of significant impacts are going down.


Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk


YOU said "basically wrote it off" So, do tell me more about getting facts straight.



The poster that I quoted said that not me............


Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk
0 likes   

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4544
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3857 Postby toad strangler » Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:11 pm

WeatherEmperor wrote:
toad strangler wrote:
WeatherEmperor wrote:
You need to get your facts straight. They never wrote it off. They simply said that a direct landfall is highly unlikely and chances of significant impacts are going down.


Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk


YOU said "basically wrote it off" So, do tell me more about getting facts straight.



The poster that I quoted said that not me............


Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk


Gotcha, my bad :sun:
Last edited by toad strangler on Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3858 Postby sma10 » Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:12 pm

WeatherEmperor wrote:
sma10 wrote:
tgenius wrote:Well for what it's worth, the local news in Miami (Channel 10) is basically writing off the storm for down here, which given all the models I guess makes sense. We may get a little wind and some rain (if that) but otherwise not too much.


I say this with love, but the last place you want to go for accurate forecasts is local TV. I gave that up back in the 90s.


Former NHC director Max Mayfield is part of the hurricane coverage team for Channel 10 so they pretty much are the real deal
Last edited by sma10 on Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

tgenius
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1160
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 5:31 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3859 Postby tgenius » Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:13 pm

By writing off obviously that it won't be a direct hit, not that it wasn't coming near the coast. Of course it can change, just what it was shown.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthernBreeze
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 284
Age: 68
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:54 pm
Location: SC/NC line- on the SC Coast

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#3860 Postby SouthernBreeze » Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:14 pm

Shows Matt barely grazing E tip of Cuba so could miss the high mountains there
http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/coamps_docs/ ... mdltrk.gif

*although some of them prob not the best of models :roll:
Last edited by SouthernBreeze on Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
My posts are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. It's just my opinion and not backed by sound meteorological data, and NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

grazed by many - most wind damage: Hugo (pre-cellphone days!) & most water: Floyd


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests