ozonepete wrote:OntarioEggplant wrote:ozonepete wrote:
It was a bad run. They probably had a system malfunction and so it misread the data or wrong data.
What? The UKMET had a very similar solution. It's a weird solution, but please don't call it a "bad run from a system malfunction" when that is not the case.
Oh, okay. I wasn't clear. To me this was a really bad run and it looks like a malfunction. It (and the other British system UKMET) made what we call an outlier so far off the mark that you discard it, throw it out. What NHC apparently did was use it in blends up until the time when it goes crazy.
Thank God for humans! Still think that mets from 50 years ago, with their pens and charts, would have done better with this storm than our super sensitive-super complex Euro and GFS.