ATL: MATTHEW - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
terrapintransit
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 275
Age: 50
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 8:08 pm
Location: Williamsport, Pa

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#7201 Postby terrapintransit » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:49 pm

Just as I suspected. Watch those models keep bending back north after NC like they were before the loop theory..


Blown Away wrote:Image
00z Guidance...
0 likes   
Aaron

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#7202 Postby SouthDadeFish » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:52 pm

Either the HRRR knows something a lot of people don't, or it's just wrong. I really hope it's the second option (much more likely). (Mods from what I understand, this is a free to access portion of WxBell)

Image
3 likes   

Tuffy
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 12:59 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#7203 Postby Tuffy » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:54 pm

Sanibel wrote:
GTStorm wrote:
GFDL weakens Matthew substantially by the time it gets up this way...what is it seeing?



Land interaction...


Increasing Shear......
0 likes   

ZX12R
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2016 8:09 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#7204 Postby ZX12R » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:55 pm

terrapintransit wrote:Just as I suspected. Watch those models keep bending back north after NC like they were before the loop theory..


Blown Away wrote:Image
00z Guidance...


Do those tracks show NHC track east of consensus? Or right on top center?
0 likes   

User avatar
Miami Storm Tracker
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 910
Age: 67
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 10:12 pm
Location: Key Largo, Fla.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#7205 Postby Miami Storm Tracker » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:56 pm

Never have heard of this model is it one to take serious?
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4822
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#7206 Postby ronjon » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:56 pm

:uarrow: it's a little fast..by about 9 hrs compared to the globals. Track looks a little south but not unreasonable.
0 likes   

dukeblue219
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 535
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:52 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#7207 Postby dukeblue219 » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:58 pm

Tuffy wrote:
Sanibel wrote:
GTStorm wrote:
GFDL weakens Matthew substantially by the time it gets up this way...what is it seeing?



Land interaction...


Increasing Shear......


The GFDL runs the storm up Florida and through GA and SC while staying over land. Land interaction is presumably most of the difference between its strength and the HWRF over the same period.
Last edited by dukeblue219 on Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#7208 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:59 pm

Image
Cat5 outliner was run is on the chart.
0 likes   

User avatar
bg1
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 409
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 11:14 am
Location: near Santee, SC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#7209 Postby bg1 » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:04 pm

ZX12R wrote:Do those tracks show NHC track east of consensus? Or right on top center?


Looks like no deviation thru 48 hours, SE of consensus at 72 and then S afterwards.
1 likes   

ZX12R
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2016 8:09 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#7210 Postby ZX12R » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:42 pm

bg1 wrote:
ZX12R wrote:Do those tracks show NHC track east of consensus? Or right on top center?


Looks like no deviation thru 48 hours, SE of consensus at 72 and then S afterwards.


Thank you, bg1. Much appreciated.
0 likes   

DIwestender
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 11:56 pm
Location: Dauphin Island, AL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#7211 Postby DIwestender » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:58 pm

Shouldn't the GFS be running now?
0 likes   

tgenius
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1160
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 5:31 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#7212 Postby tgenius » Wed Oct 05, 2016 10:00 pm

DIwestender wrote:Shouldn't the GFS be running now?

Starts about 11:25ish.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#7213 Postby RL3AO » Wed Oct 05, 2016 10:05 pm

SouthDadeFish wrote:Either the HRRR knows something a lot of people don't, or it's just wrong. I really hope it's the second option (much more likely). (Mods from what I understand, this is a free to access portion of WxBell)


If it's right, it would be the biggest forecasting disaster in the modern era of meteorology. That's why I'm sure it's wrong. (Famous last words)
1 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4226
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#7214 Postby South Texas Storms » Wed Oct 05, 2016 10:08 pm

RL3AO wrote:
SouthDadeFish wrote:Either the HRRR knows something a lot of people don't, or it's just wrong. I really hope it's the second option (much more likely). (Mods from what I understand, this is a free to access portion of WxBell)


If it's right, it would be the biggest forecasting disaster in the modern era of meteorology. That's why I'm sure it's wrong. (Famous last words)


I wouldn't be so sure it's wrong. It actually did very well forecasting the landfall spot of Hermine in the Florida Panhandle this year. This will be another good test case for it.
0 likes   

tgenius
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1160
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 5:31 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#7215 Postby tgenius » Wed Oct 05, 2016 10:08 pm

RL3AO wrote:
SouthDadeFish wrote:Either the HRRR knows something a lot of people don't, or it's just wrong. I really hope it's the second option (much more likely). (Mods from what I understand, this is a free to access portion of WxBell)


If it's right, it would be the biggest forecasting disaster in the modern era of meteorology. That's why I'm sure it's wrong. (Famous last words)


If that really were to play out dade county would almost basically be caught with pants down. I don't think it will, and I pray it doesn't. :/
0 likes   

User avatar
La Sirena
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 307
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 4:02 pm
Location: Formerly of the Keys, back home in East TN

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#7216 Postby La Sirena » Wed Oct 05, 2016 10:09 pm

tgenius wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
SouthDadeFish wrote:Either the HRRR knows something a lot of people don't, or it's just wrong. I really hope it's the second option (much more likely). (Mods from what I understand, this is a free to access portion of WxBell)


If it's right, it would be the biggest forecasting disaster in the modern era of meteorology. That's why I'm sure it's wrong. (Famous last words)


If that really were to play out dade county would almost basically be caught with pants down. I don't think it will, and I pray it doesn't. :/

That's been my biggest fear with these models all along.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

Soonercane

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#7217 Postby Soonercane » Wed Oct 05, 2016 10:12 pm

Wow that HRRR run scares me a lot, but I don't know if it is a good model for these things.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#7218 Postby RL3AO » Wed Oct 05, 2016 10:14 pm

Soonercane wrote:Wow that HRRR run scares me a lot, but I don't know if it is a good model for these things.


We've never had the HRRR around with an approaching major hurricane. However, it's not specifically designed for tropical cyclones. It's also a state of the art high-resolution model...so.
1 likes   

User avatar
terstorm1012
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1314
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:36 pm
Location: Millersburg, PA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#7219 Postby terstorm1012 » Wed Oct 05, 2016 10:14 pm

I like the HRRR but I think it's a bit too far west. It has Matthew moving over Andros and it looks like , to me the eye will move just to the east of Andros or even closer to Nassau. Since I found out it runs every hour I'll probably end up staying up too late looking at its output :double:
1 likes   
my posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just my opinion (to which I welcome challenges!) and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2079
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#7220 Postby Blinhart » Wed Oct 05, 2016 10:14 pm

tgenius wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
SouthDadeFish wrote:Either the HRRR knows something a lot of people don't, or it's just wrong. I really hope it's the second option (much more likely). (Mods from what I understand, this is a free to access portion of WxBell)


If it's right, it would be the biggest forecasting disaster in the modern era of meteorology. That's why I'm sure it's wrong. (Famous last words)


If that really were to play out dade county would almost basically be caught with pants down. I don't think it will, and I pray it doesn't. :/



And unfortunately wouldn't be the first time and probably won't be the last time.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests