ATL: CINDY - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#221 Postby wxman57 » Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:16 am

12Z GFS shifting west. I think it will swing toward the EC/UKMET solution.
3 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#222 Postby Steve » Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:16 am

GFS Parallel brings the system over NOLA 84 hours. That's wed afternoon. CMC at 48 hours is farther south of the LA Coast with heavy rains across SE LA.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#223 Postby ROCK » Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:19 am

Reminds me of Humberto in 07...took forever until approaching the coast and RIed like crazy.
2 likes   

User avatar
Rgv20
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2466
Age: 38
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:42 pm
Location: Edinburg/McAllen Tx

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#224 Postby Rgv20 » Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:22 am

12CMC has landfall Thursday in South Texas Corpus Christi area but it weakens 93L prior to landfall.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2079
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#225 Postby Blinhart » Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:23 am

ROCK wrote:Reminds me of Humberto in 07...took forever until approaching the coast and RIed like crazy.


exactly my train of thought.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#226 Postby Ivanhater » Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:24 am

CMC gets sheared off as it approaches the northern gulf coast..low looks to go with the low level flow once sheared off...CMC has the worst weather along the northern gulf coast
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#227 Postby Steve » Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:27 am

It reminds me of TS Bill 2003 if GFS Parallel was right. Rainy spring and then a TS coming up off the Yucatán.
0 likes   

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#228 Postby TheStormExpert » Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:27 am

Blinhart wrote:
ROCK wrote:Reminds me of Humberto in 07...took forever until approaching the coast and RIed like crazy.


exactly my train of thought.

But most models show this weakening prior to making landfall.
1 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#229 Postby wxman57 » Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:35 am

Well, well, models are converging on the westerly track.
5 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#230 Postby ROCK » Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:39 am

12z NAM is mid TX coast so following the western solution as well..CMC and GFS will come around..:))
1 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#231 Postby Steve » Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:40 am

wxman57 wrote:Well, well, models are converging on the westerly track.


They are as expected. Though I don't see any of them washing this out in the Bay of Campeche or never forming as was what the ECMWF showed most of this week. So that's also important to note for the Euro huggers.
2 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#232 Postby RL3AO » Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:43 am

Steve wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Well, well, models are converging on the westerly track.


They are as expected. Though I don't see any of them washing this out in the Bay of Campeche or never forming as was what the ECMWF showed most of this week. So that's also important to note for the Euro huggers.


Shh. The EURO was 110% right about everything. It had everything about the development and track of 93L exactly right. :D
4 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#233 Postby ROCK » Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:44 am

I am more of a NAM NAVGEM hugger..::))
2 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145299
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#234 Postby cycloneye » Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:45 am

1 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#235 Postby Steve » Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:51 am

That's true TSE. But don't count on a perpendicular hit on TX from a weakening system. It happens but is rarer. I picked up a couple of cases of water yesterday just to be ahead of the game.
0 likes   

CYCLONE MIKE
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2183
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: Gonzales, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#236 Postby CYCLONE MIKE » Sun Jun 18, 2017 12:00 pm

Think the gfs and cmc is much too quick with the notherly movement. Liking the nam and rgem showing a slow steady track nw. Steve, looks like we could be dealing with a lot of rain this upcoming week. If nam is correct will be hanging around for quite a while. It seems every year gfs starts out west, swings wildly east, then gradually moves back west.
2 likes   
This post is NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECAST and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#237 Postby wxman57 » Sun Jun 18, 2017 12:03 pm

Steve wrote:That's true TSE. But don't count on a perpendicular hit on TX from a weakening system. It happens but is rarer. I picked up a couple of cases of water yesterday just to be ahead of the game.


It should be turning north Wednesday evening as it approaches the TX coast.
1 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#238 Postby stormreader » Sun Jun 18, 2017 12:06 pm

Steve wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Well, well, models are converging on the westerly track.


They are as expected. Though I don't see any of them washing this out in the Bay of Campeche or never forming as was what the ECMWF showed most of this week. So that's also important to note for the Euro huggers.


I'm not really a lover of the Euro or any model. And last year was not a good year for models. I just thought that without any clear cut troughing to the north of the system that a typical more westerly (according to climo) track was much more likely. Pretty confident the system will be near the Texas coast (perhaps the La-Tex border. If true, I don't think it would be a big victory for the Euro (seemed the most obvious track), but it would give us pause to wonder about the GFS. But we must remember both models had a sub-par year last year.
2 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#239 Postby Frank2 » Sun Jun 18, 2017 12:08 pm

Is that a MLC in the current loop? It's a little intimidating...
1 likes   

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#240 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Sun Jun 18, 2017 12:10 pm

Frank2 wrote:Is that a MLC in the current loop? It's a little intimidating...


I believe a new center has or will soon form there. It looks vigorous.
0 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest