ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#241 Postby Hurricaneman » Mon Jul 03, 2017 11:02 pm

It's heading w to wnw after that erroneous north movement between 24 and 48 hours
0 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15980
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#242 Postby Kingarabian » Mon Jul 03, 2017 11:06 pm

Alyono wrote:0Z MU MUCH weaker through 48 hrs. Actually shows weakening during this time period

of course, it's likely BS as it somehow shifted north and has the center in line with Dominica in 54 hours... all the way to 15N


They have to be on to something since the GFS, UKMET, and Euro are all lining up now.

Unless the environment data is mixed up.

The NHC should ask for G-IV plane to go check it out or send a drone from NOAA.
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#243 Postby Alyono » Mon Jul 03, 2017 11:16 pm

Kingarabian wrote:
Alyono wrote:0Z MU MUCH weaker through 48 hrs. Actually shows weakening during this time period

of course, it's likely BS as it somehow shifted north and has the center in line with Dominica in 54 hours... all the way to 15N


They have to be on to something since the GFS, UKMET, and Euro are all lining up now.

Unless the environment data is mixed up.

The NHC should ask for G-IV plane to go check it out or send a drone from NOAA.


not getting synoptic surveillance this far out

Of course, we saw with Matthew the models can absolutely butcher the steering flow, when they had a ridge vanish for no reason

As good as modeling is today, there remains some error, some due to paramaterization, some due to bad data, and a LOT due to rounding errors (we're solving millions of PDEs that have no explicit solutions numerically. That will ALWAYS create error)
2 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#244 Postby Alyono » Mon Jul 03, 2017 11:18 pm

one thing that is becoming clear, the subtropical western Atlantic will be UNFAVORABLE for this. Doesn't look favorable like it did 24 hours ago
1 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#245 Postby Alyono » Mon Jul 03, 2017 11:22 pm

UKMET also drops it


NEW TROPICAL CYCLONE FORECAST TO DEVELOP AFTER 12 HOURS
FORECAST POSITION AT T+ 12 : 10.1N 33.8W

LEAD CENTRAL MAXIMUM WIND
VERIFYING TIME TIME POSITION PRESSURE (MB) SPEED (KNOTS)
-------------- ---- -------- ------------- -------------
1200UTC 04.07.2017 12 10.1N 33.8W 1013 22
0000UTC 05.07.2017 24 11.5N 34.6W 1013 24
1200UTC 05.07.2017 36 12.3N 36.4W 1014 24
0000UTC 06.07.2017 48 13.0N 38.6W 1014 25
1200UTC 06.07.2017 60 CEASED TRACKING

I sure would not be increasing development chances after the 0Z models have all trended dramatically weaker, even though it seems suspect
2 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15980
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#246 Postby Kingarabian » Mon Jul 03, 2017 11:25 pm

Well 94L is going to have to detoriate rather quickly if those models are going to verify.
1 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#247 Postby Hurricaneman » Mon Jul 03, 2017 11:30 pm

Kingarabian wrote:Well 94L is going to have to detoriate rather quickly if those models are going to verify.

I must say the models seem to be a complete fail on this cycle and we should wait until the next cycle and of course wait until the Euro comes out in a few hours
0 likes   

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#248 Postby TheStormExpert » Mon Jul 03, 2017 11:41 pm

Alyono wrote:one thing that is becoming clear, the subtropical western Atlantic will be UNFAVORABLE for this. Doesn't look favorable like it did 24 hours ago

Just an hour ago you were disagreeing with these models, these forecasts too are beyond 5-7 days and we know how bad shear forecast tend to be.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#249 Postby Hurricaneman » Mon Jul 03, 2017 11:41 pm

The GFS seems to be at 27.5n 71.5w at 210 hrs with low wind shear but based on that one would think this would be stronger in that sort of environment but it could also be wrong so who knows
0 likes   

User avatar
Ntxw
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 22784
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#250 Postby Ntxw » Mon Jul 03, 2017 11:48 pm

Hurricaneman wrote:
Kingarabian wrote:Well 94L is going to have to detoriate rather quickly if those models are going to verify.

I must say the models seem to be a complete fail on this cycle and we should wait until the next cycle and of course wait until the Euro comes out in a few hours


I don't think it's a good idea to disregard a set of runs because they show something different. It doesn't mean they are right either, you have to take long term forecasts (beyond 3-5 days) as simply educated guesses. It's even more questionable be it a strong or weak run when you're looking at a broad, monsoonal feature such as this. There is more to conditions than just shear such as dry air at various levels of the atmosphere, interactions with TUTT features, sinking and rising air etc.
1 likes   
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.

  Help support Storm2K!
Help Support Storm2K

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#251 Postby Bocadude85 » Mon Jul 03, 2017 11:52 pm

The 0z HWRF is coming in stronger then the 18Z so far.

The 0Z Canadian is also stronger in its long range forecast with a North Carolina landfall.
0 likes   

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#252 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Tue Jul 04, 2017 12:15 am

Ntxw wrote:
Hurricaneman wrote:
Kingarabian wrote:Well 94L is going to have to detoriate rather quickly if those models are going to verify.

I must say the models seem to be a complete fail on this cycle and we should wait until the next cycle and of course wait until the Euro comes out in a few hours


I don't think it's a good idea to disregard a set of runs because they show something different. It doesn't mean they are right either, you have to take long term forecasts (beyond 3-5 days) as simply educated guesses. It's even more questionable be it a strong or weak run when you're looking at a broad, monsoonal feature such as this. There is more to conditions than just shear such as dry air at various levels of the atmosphere, interactions with TUTT features, sinking and rising air etc.


Tutts can either hinder intensification with shear or aid the tropical cyclone genesis.
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#253 Postby tolakram » Tue Jul 04, 2017 12:20 am

0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

NotoSans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1380
Age: 25
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2015 1:15 am
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#254 Postby NotoSans » Tue Jul 04, 2017 12:31 am

Up to 70/80 as per latest TWO
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC and NWS products.

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#255 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Tue Jul 04, 2017 12:34 am

Code RED for the next 48 hrs.
1 likes   

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Discussion

#256 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Tue Jul 04, 2017 12:44 am

0 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#257 Postby Hammy » Tue Jul 04, 2017 1:49 am

Image
Image

Euro stronger than earlier run (and latest GFS) and maintains a closed low through at least 72 hours.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16143
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#258 Postby Yellow Evan » Tue Jul 04, 2017 2:18 am

* ATLANTIC SHIPS INTENSITY FORECAST *
* IR SAT DATA AVAILABLE, OHC AVAILABLE *
* INVEST AL942017 07/04/17 06 UTC *

TIME (HR) 0 6 12 18 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
V (KT) NO LAND 30 33 36 39 42 48 56 63 71 75 77 76 75
V (KT) LAND 30 33 36 39 42 48 56 63 71 75 77 76 75
V (KT) LGEM 30 32 34 35 36 39 44 51 60 68 76 80 80
Storm Type TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP TROP

SHEAR (KT) 20 23 20 17 16 11 5 7 6 6 2 3 11
SHEAR ADJ (KT) -4 -5 -3 -3 -6 -3 2 -1 0 -1 7 13 6
SHEAR DIR 43 43 47 53 46 48 32 32 30 64 242 211 234
SST (C) 27.7 27.6 27.5 27.4 27.2 26.5 26.5 26.8 27.2 27.7 27.7 27.9 28.3
POT. INT. (KT) 130 129 129 129 127 121 121 125 129 135 135 138 143
ADJ. POT. INT. 124 124 126 128 127 122 123 126 131 137 134 137 142
200 MB T (C) -54.6 -54.6 -54.3 -54.5 -54.8 -54.1 -54.7 -54.1 -54.3 -54.2 -54.4 -54.3 -54.6
200 MB VXT (C) 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3
TH_E DEV (C) 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 7 7 9 9 10 11
700-500 MB RH 73 75 78 79 79 73 68 64 62 55 51 50 49
MODEL VTX (KT) 11 13 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 13 13 11 9
850 MB ENV VOR 36 33 23 13 4 -3 -8 -2 13 12 7 -3 -3
200 MB DIV 64 64 70 79 81 39 17 23 43 28 7 -2 12
700-850 TADV -1 -3 -3 -4 -7 -8 3 0 4 2 1 4 5
LAND (KM) 1892 1904 1917 1883 1821 1613 1415 1225 1074 1008 823 686 317
LAT (DEG N) 9.1 xx.x xx.x xx.x xx.x xx.x xx.x xx.x xx.x xx.x xx.x xx.x xx.x
LONG(DEG W) 33.9 xxx.x xxx.x xxx.x xxx.x xxx.x xxx.x xxx.x xxx.x xxx.x xxx.x xxx.x xxx.x
STM SPEED (KT) 4 4 7 10 12 15 17 18 17 17 16 17 17
HEAT CONTENT 18 19 19 22 27 9 6 16 12 22 32 21 37

FORECAST TRACK FROM OFPI INITIAL HEADING/SPEED (DEG/KT):275/ 4 CX,CY: -3/ 0
T-12 MAX WIND: 25 PRESSURE OF STEERING LEVEL (MB): 644 (MEAN=618)
GOES IR BRIGHTNESS TEMP. STD DEV. 50-200 KM RAD: 21.7 (MEAN=14.5)
% GOES IR PIXELS WITH T < -20 C 50-200 KM RAD: 68.0 (MEAN=65.0)
PRELIM RI PROB (DV .GE. 55 KT IN 48 HR): 3.1

INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO INTENSITY CHANGE
6 12 18 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
----------------------------------------------------------
SAMPLE MEAN CHANGE 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 13.
SST POTENTIAL 1. 1. 2. 3. 6. 10. 14. 18. 21. 24. 26. 28.
VERTICAL SHEAR MAG -0. -1. -1. -1. -1. 0. 2. 3. 4. 6. 7. 7.
VERTICAL SHEAR ADJ 0. 1. 1. 2. 3. 4. 4. 4. 4. 3. 2. 1.
VERTICAL SHEAR DIR 0. 1. 2. 3. 5. 8. 10. 13. 15. 14. 13. 11.
PERSISTENCE 1. 1. 2. 2. 2. 2. 1. 1. 1. 0. 0. -0.
200/250 MB TEMP. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. 0. 0. 1. 2. 2.
THETA_E EXCESS -0. -0. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -2. -2. -1. -1.
700-500 MB RH -0. -0. -1. -1. -2. -4. -5. -5. -6. -5. -4. -4.
MODEL VTX TENDENCY 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 1. -2. -3. -7. -9.
850 MB ENV VORTICITY 0. 0. -0. -0. -0. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -2.
200 MB DIVERGENCE 0. 0. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 0. 0. -0.
850-700 T ADVEC 0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -0.
ZONAL STORM MOTION -0. 0. 0. 0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -1. -1. -1. -1.
STEERING LEVEL PRES -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -0.
DAYS FROM CLIM. PEAK 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. 1. 2. 2. 2.
GOES PREDICTORS 0. 0. 1. 1. 0. 0. -0. -0. -1. -1. -1. -1.
OCEAN HEAT CONTENT -0. -0. -0. -0. -0. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -1. -0.
----------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL CHANGE 3. 6. 9. 12. 18. 26. 33. 41. 45. 47. 46. 45.

CURRENT MAX WIND (KT): 30. LAT, LON: 9.1 33.9

** 2017 ATLANTIC RI INDEX AL942017 INVEST 07/04/17 06 UTC **
(SHIPS-RII PREDICTOR TABLE for 30 KT OR MORE MAXIMUM WIND INCREASE IN NEXT 24-h)

Predictor Value RI Predictor Range Scaled Value(0-1) % Contribution
12 HR PERSISTENCE (KT): 5.0 -49.5 to 33.0 0.66 4.3
850-200 MB SHEAR (KT) : 19.4 30.1 to 2.9 0.39 1.0
HEAT CONTENT (KJ/cm2) : 21.0 0.0 to 156.2 0.13 0.3
2nd PC OF IR BR TEMP : 0.5 2.4 to -3.0 0.35 0.9
STD DEV OF IR BR TEMP : 21.7 36.6 to 2.8 0.44 1.2
MAXIMUM WIND (kt) : 30.0 22.5 to 121.0 0.21 0.3
POT = MPI-VMAX (KT) : 95.8 28.4 to 139.6 0.61 1.1
D200 (10**7s-1) : 71.6 -29.7 to 181.5 0.48 0.4
BL DRY-AIR FLUX (w/m2): 36.2 961.4 to -67.1 0.90 0.0
% AREA WITH TPW <45 mm: 0.0 100.0 to 0.0 1.00 0.1

SHIPS Prob RI for 20kt/ 12hr RI threshold= 4% is 0.8 times sample mean ( 5.4%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 25kt/ 24hr RI threshold= 13% is 1.1 times sample mean (11.5%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 30kt/ 24hr RI threshold= 10% is 1.3 times sample mean ( 7.4%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 35kt/ 24hr RI threshold= 6% is 1.4 times sample mean ( 4.3%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 40kt/ 24hr RI threshold= 5% is 1.7 times sample mean ( 2.8%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 45kt/ 36hr RI threshold= 10% is 1.9 times sample mean ( 5.1%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 55kt/ 48hr RI threshold= 12% is 2.2 times sample mean ( 5.3%)
SHIPS Prob RI for 65kt/ 72hr RI threshold= 18% is 3.0 times sample mean ( 6.0%)

Matrix of RI probabilities
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RI (kt / h) | 20/12 | 25/24 | 30/24 | 35/24 | 40/24 | 45/36 | 55/48 |65/72
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHIPS-RII: 4.1% 13.0% 9.7% 5.8% 4.7% 9.8% 11.5% 18.1%
Logistic: 2.9% 7.7% 3.0% 0.5% 0.0% 3.0% 8.1% 12.2%
Bayesian: 2.4% 19.9% 2.5% 0.1% 0.0% 0.8% 1.3% 1.2%
Consensus: 3.1% 13.5% 5.1% 2.1% 1.6% 4.6% 7.0% 10.5%

** PROBLTY OF AT LEAST 1 SCNDRY EYEWL FORMTN EVENT AL942017 INVEST 07/04/2017 06 UTC **
TIME(HR) 0-12 12-24(0-24) 24-36(0-36) 36-48(0-48)
CLIMO(%) 0 0( 0) 0( 0) 0( 0) <-- PROB BASED ON INTENSITY ONLY
PROB(%) 0 0( 0) 0( 0) 0( 0) <-- FULL MODEL PROB (RAN NORMALLY)

** DSHIPS INTENSITY FORECAST ADJUSTED RELATIVE TO ONSET OF ERC WEAKENING PHASE **
TIME (HR) 0 6 12 18 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120
>24HR AGO (DSHIPS) 30 33 36 39 42 48 56 63 71 75 77 76 75
18HR AGO 30 29 32 35 38 44 52 59 67 71 73 72 71
12HR AGO 30 27 26 29 32 38 46 53 61 65 67 66 65
6HR AGO 30 24 21 20 23 29 37 44 52 56 58 57 56
NOW CURRENT INTENSITY < 83 KT
IN 6HR INTENSITY IN 6HR < 83 KT
IN 12HR INTENSITY IN 12HR < 83 K
0 likes   

bamajammer4eva
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 907
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 3:21 am
Location: Ozark, AL

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#259 Postby bamajammer4eva » Tue Jul 04, 2017 2:47 am

Here is the Euro animated-it nearly loses it for a bit then picks it back up and is a 1009mb Low at the end by that model

Image
0 likes   

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#260 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Tue Jul 04, 2017 3:29 am

Image



Image
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests