Kingarabian wrote:00z Euro Parallel similar to the 00z Euro Operational run. Recurves just before hitting Peurto Rico. Intensities is at 982mb, 23mb higher. Moving slowly.
Is the 500mb pattern the same on days 8-10?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Kingarabian wrote:00z Euro Parallel similar to the 00z Euro Operational run. Recurves just before hitting Peurto Rico. Intensities is at 982mb, 23mb higher. Moving slowly.
ROCK wrote:Forecasting the 500 pattern 8-11 days from now is like playing darts with a really bad player. Fun to do but full of errors. We need to wait until this gets closer in the mid range..like 172hrs and in range and not the 288 range lol
Alyono wrote:cycloneye wrote:Now this is turning more serious for the islands as the main models are on consensus.Fellow friends in the islands,let's be prepared in case what the models are showing comes to fructition but still is not a stone thing until a system is formed as things in the atmospheric pattern can change in 10 days.
with the SAL and unfavorable MJO?
I'd give this a 20% chance of development within the next 7 days. If it develops, it should not exceed weak to moderate TS intensity given the large scale unfavorable conditions. Maybe if it can get north of the deep tropics, it will have a chance to do more
Siker wrote:12z CMC picked this up for the first time.
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:Strong shear & land interaction keeps the system in check this run beyond 240 hours, but at the same time we're talking about total fantasy land.
TheStormExpert wrote:Hypercane_Kyle wrote:Strong shear & land interaction keeps the system in check this run beyond 240 hours, but at the same time we're talking about total fantasy land.
Idk it looks to still have it's anticyclone overhead. I'm thinking close proximity to the southern coast of Cuba and the other Greater Antilles is to explain for the ragged mess in the Gulf, though that's too far out to speculate.
stormlover2013 wrote:180 hours ignore after that
tarheelprogrammer wrote:stormlover2013 wrote:180 hours ignore after that
I second this. Two thumbs up. However, I would say 96 hours, and stop there.
Users browsing this forum: johngaltfla and 44 guests