ATL: GERT - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#641 Postby gatorcane » Sat Aug 05, 2017 3:44 pm

Last visible loop before sun goes down with popcorn convection starting:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#642 Postby Steve » Sat Aug 05, 2017 3:47 pm

TheStormExpert wrote:Smells like 2013 all over again.

 https://twitter.com/pppapin/status/893915338567450624




I think you may have drawn this comparison 2013 times already. It would still almost assuredly be wrong on the 2014th. Haha. I just don't see it.
1 likes   

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#643 Postby TheStormExpert » Sat Aug 05, 2017 3:55 pm

Anticyclone building overhead, wind-shear should be low until it approaches the NE Caribbean, SAL starting to clear out some, and 850mb vorticity building about 9N, 36W which is too far south of the thunderstorm activity. Add in the unfavorable Atlantic background forcing and you likely have little to no chance of this amounting to much anytime soon.

Image

Image

Image

Image
0 likes   

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#644 Postby TheStormExpert » Sat Aug 05, 2017 3:56 pm

Steve wrote:
TheStormExpert wrote:Smells like 2013 all over again.

 https://twitter.com/pppapin/status/893915338567450624




I think you may have drawn this comparison 2013 times already. It would still almost assuredly be wrong on the 2014th. Haha. I just don't see it.

Did you read the comments below the tweet?
1 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#645 Postby stormreader » Sat Aug 05, 2017 4:00 pm

gatorcane wrote:Last visible loop before sun goes down with popcorn convection starting:

Image

And on the infrared. And as many have noted, it does look better. I mean it might surprise overnight. Possible that by tomorrow we have a different outlook on this feature. Image
1 likes   

User avatar
AubreyStorm
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 337
Age: 44
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2017 6:21 pm
Location: Texas, USA

ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#646 Postby AubreyStorm » Sat Aug 05, 2017 4:05 pm

‪ECMWF ensembles more aggressive with #Invest99L ‬
Here we go!

Image
1 likes   
The posts are NOT an official forecast. Please REFER to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts and products.

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#647 Postby txwatcher91 » Sat Aug 05, 2017 4:08 pm

AJC3 wrote:
txwatcher91 wrote:Vorticity is becoming a bit stronger and the axis is beginning to consolidate better now. It could begin organizing tonight if trends continue.


Two things you would look for toward that end...

1) Obviously, consolidating of the vorticity, higher values. Thunderstorms along the central and southern flank of the wave axis would help increase convergence and thus vorticity.

2) Also, the wave axis trending toward more of a neutral tilt with time. From strictly a fluid mechanics standpoint, the environment needs to be favorable so that deformation stress can push the northern flank of the wave axis forward relative to the rest of the wave. In other words, the ambient easterly component to the wind flow needs to be stronger, the farther north along the wave axis you go, for the entire length of its axis. This would increase convergence as well.

So far, this hasn't occurred enough to allow the wave to organize. Also, it seems to me that the overall thermodynamic environment hasn't been all that great this far, as has been pointed out by others several times.


Looking through the CIMSS data, the wave axis has been trending closer to a neutral tilt and the vorticity as well. I think that’s why we are finally seeing some convection starting to build. A long ways to go though, we will see what happens tonight.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#648 Postby Steve » Sat Aug 05, 2017 4:11 pm

Yeah I did. But I never said I ever thought 99L would do anything for a while anyway, so that's not really a surprise to me. The outlier ideas came from the GFS and even more so the CMC with the recurve between the US and Bermuda. I distinctly recall discussing the GFS output on this system with Frank2, where I said the GFS would likely keep tending west like it does earlier in the year. And I said today that I didn't expect anything until 75W if ever. So again, I'm not disagreeing with Michael. I'm just amused by how badly you seem to want 2017 to Parallel 2013. I still think 2004 and maybe in some ways 95 and maybe even a hint of 88 all end up better analogs from recent years. One or possibly both of us will be dead wrong.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#649 Postby gatorcane » Sat Aug 05, 2017 4:12 pm

18Z Guidance:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15981
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#650 Postby Kingarabian » Sat Aug 05, 2017 4:20 pm

AubreyStorm wrote:‪ECMWF ensembles more aggressive with #Invest99L ‬
Here we go!

[img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DGfqZMiWsAEO1CZ.jpg:large[img]


Less than 5% support for a TS for 99L throughout 240 hours per the 12z EPS.
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#651 Postby Hammy » Sat Aug 05, 2017 4:29 pm

TheStormExpert wrote:
Steve wrote:
TheStormExpert wrote:Smells like 2013 all over again.

 https://twitter.com/pppapin/status/893915338567450624




I think you may have drawn this comparison 2013 times already. It would still almost assuredly be wrong on the 2014th. Haha. I just don't see it.

Did you read the comments below the tweet?


All it means is that others have a similarly wrong idea.
1 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Emmett_Brown
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1432
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Sarasota FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#652 Postby Emmett_Brown » Sat Aug 05, 2017 4:33 pm

gatorcane wrote:12Z UKMET with development again with west turn at the end:

Image


This is an interesting solution. I wonder what causes the more northerly component of motion in the near term. Perhaps interacting with an upper low creates the northward component. The 12Z GFS has a stout ridge off of the US E coast at after 150 hours. Assuming this formed, it could continue W long enough to threaten land.
0 likes   

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4231
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#653 Postby abajan » Sat Aug 05, 2017 4:51 pm

OuterBanker wrote:Just an observation. Seems to me that something is trying to organize around 12n 37w ...

Convection is increasing at those coordinates. Should be an interesting night.
1 likes   

User avatar
StormTracker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2903
Age: 59
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 6:06 am
Location: Quail Heights(Redlands), FL.

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#654 Postby StormTracker » Sat Aug 05, 2017 5:21 pm

Just give 99L some time. Remember, patience is a virtue! I think we're all going to look back on this discussion and feel some kind of way when this system does whatever it does...ST :wink:
1 likes   
Something's wrong when you regret, things that haven't happened yet!

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145331
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#655 Postby cycloneye » Sat Aug 05, 2017 5:24 pm

Looking better.Let's see if DMAX helps it more.

Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#656 Postby Hammy » Sat Aug 05, 2017 5:25 pm

StormTracker wrote:Just give 99L some time. Remember, patience is a virtue! I think we're all going to look back on this discussion and feel some kind of way when this system does whatever it does...ST :wink:


I'm still thinking this will at least spin up into a depression but not sure when--the models have certainly backed off on development, but at the same time the organization isn't decreasing any.
1 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#657 Postby floridasun78 » Sat Aug 05, 2017 5:54 pm

i think we need see how wave do next few days i think this one we need watch
2 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145331
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#658 Postby cycloneye » Sat Aug 05, 2017 6:42 pm

8 PM TWO 30%-50%

Shower activity associated with an elongated area of low pressure
located about 1000 miles west-southwest of the Cabo Verde Islands
has become a little better organized during the past 24 hours.
Some additional slow development is possible during the next two to
three days before the system encounters less favorable
environmental conditions during the middle part of next week. This
system is expected to move generally west-northwestward across the
tropical Atlantic Ocean at about 15 mph.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...low...30 percent.
* Formation chance through 5 days...medium...50 percent.
1 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
AtlanticWind
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1889
Age: 66
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 9:57 pm
Location: Plantation,Fla

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#659 Postby AtlanticWind » Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:03 pm

Kinda funny, the models now have backed off development significantly and
and the system is finally looking like it is forming.Has some convection and
is becoming more circular. Also spin is definitely evident tonight.
5 likes   

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#660 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:16 pm

Actually, there is more vorticity with 99L than 90L currently. It has been consolidating all day long just like 90L.

Image
2 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests