Kazmit wrote:This really feels like an Earl 2.0. But since it's further north, it will have more time to restrengthen over the Bay of Campeche before its second landfall.
That would be 1996 Dolly
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Kazmit wrote:This really feels like an Earl 2.0. But since it's further north, it will have more time to restrengthen over the Bay of Campeche before its second landfall.
Alyono wrote:Kazmit wrote:This really feels like an Earl 2.0. But since it's further north, it will have more time to restrengthen over the Bay of Campeche before its second landfall.
That would be 1996 Dolly
stormreader wrote:This year we have the new designation "potential tropical cyclone". Thinking back (really don't recall), for the five named storms so far, how many of them were designated "tropical depression" in the course of their existence?
Ntxw wrote:First full visibles and this is quickly becoming a dangerous storm for Mexico
Alyono wrote:if this builds a core before striking the Yucatan, it may be better news for the heavily populated areas down the line. This is what HWRF is showing. Shows a storm without a core when it comes off of the Yucatan. Thus, it is unable to rapidly intensify
Ntxw wrote:Alyono wrote:Kazmit wrote:This really feels like an Earl 2.0. But since it's further north, it will have more time to restrengthen over the Bay of Campeche before its second landfall.
That would be 1996 Dolly
You've mentioned Karl 2010. That would be the closest match and upper ceiling for this storm
Siker wrote:Alyono wrote:if this builds a core before striking the Yucatan, it may be better news for the heavily populated areas down the line. This is what HWRF is showing. Shows a storm without a core when it comes off of the Yucatan. Thus, it is unable to rapidly intensify
This is a really interesting idea and something that's been well observed in previous intense storms over the Yucatán as you mentioned. Is there any literature on the processes behind this or why an established core is disrupted more easily / takes longer to reestablish itself after land?
tolakram wrote:>> the new GOES-16 nighttime microphysics imagery
https://weather.msfc.nasa.gov/sport/training/rgb_ntmicro/RGB%20Nighttime%20Microphysics%20Reference%20Guide.pdf
Looking at the SLIDER options, it has RGB air mass but not microphysics.
http://rammb-slider.cira.colostate.edu/?sat=goes-16&sec=conus&x=6509&y=7318&z=3&im=36&ts=1&st=0&et=0&speed=130&motion=loop&map=1&lat=0&p%5B0%5D=18&opacity%5B0%5D=1&hidden%5B0%5D=0&pause=0&slider=-1&hide_controls=0&mouse_draw=0&s=rammb-slider
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests