ATL: HARVEY - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
stormreader

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#401 Postby stormreader » Mon Aug 14, 2017 5:56 pm

RL3AO wrote:18Z GFS. Saved in first post of the thread.

Image


Can we say that this GFS run represents an "outlier"?? That looks nothing like any of the other plots I've seen recently. Wild swings. I thought consensus was for building ridge in Atlantic???
1 likes   

hcane27
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 231
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 7:33 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#402 Postby hcane27 » Mon Aug 14, 2017 6:28 pm

I truly doubt the "ridge-building" scenario. I just believe that there will enough trough intrusions in the western Atlantic to forego any U.S. east coast landfalls. There , I said it.
2 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#403 Postby stormreader » Mon Aug 14, 2017 6:51 pm

hcane27 wrote:I truly doubt the "ridge-building" scenario. I just believe that there will enough trough intrusions in the western Atlantic to forego any U.S. east coast landfalls. There , I said it.


Sounds like your basing that on the persistent troughing we've had this year....and perhaps like 2004 whom some have mentioned as a possible analog year.
0 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#404 Postby stormreader » Mon Aug 14, 2017 6:55 pm

stormreader wrote:
hcane27 wrote:I truly doubt the "ridge-building" scenario. I just believe that there will enough trough intrusions in the western Atlantic to forego any U.S. east coast landfalls. There , I said it.


Sounds like your basing that on the persistent troughing we've had this year....and perhaps like 2004 whom some have mentioned as a possible analog year.

Better correct myself though. When thinking of 2004 Charley automatically comes to mind with that unusually strong Aug trough taking him north over Fl and then out to sea. But later in the year, we did have persistent ridging, if I recall with Jeanne and a storm before Jeanne (can't remember) that were pushed due west into central Fl and hit at almost the exact same spot. So the year of the unusually strong trough, gave way to ridging for much of the later season. 1995, an incredibly active year (some have mentioned as a possible analog), did have very persistent troughing. Such that with all of the hurricane activity, the US was by and large spared, with storms heading off the coast.
1 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#405 Postby Hammy » Mon Aug 14, 2017 7:14 pm

stormreader wrote:
RL3AO wrote:18Z GFS. Saved in first post of the thread.



Can we say that this GFS run represents an "outlier"?? That looks nothing like any of the other plots I've seen recently. Wild swings. I thought consensus was for building ridge in Atlantic???


Think of Cindy back in June--take that as an early indicator of the models handling of the steering--the GFS seems like it overestimates the troughs, while the Euro overestimates the ridges (it had Cindy going into Tampico for many runs.) so whatever the two models show, if they can come up with some degree of consistency, would probably be somewhere between.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Christiana
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:13 am
Location: NOLA / Gulfport MS

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#406 Postby Christiana » Mon Aug 14, 2017 7:56 pm

I hope this is OK to post here, if not, Mods please delete or move. I constantly see questions, comments, criticisms etc concerning the computer models used for Tropical Guidance. As a total layperson, but as someone whose life has been tragically altered by Major Hurricanes more than once I just want to understand as much as I can. I found this website the other day and the information there on the different models and their complexities I found concise and easy to understand. To our Pro-Mets, if there is a better official site out there for similar information that the average person can understand please post. It's obvious to me that there is much misunderstanding about the different models and it's easy to see why. Very advanced, very complex, fascinating and evolving. Thanks again to all the experts here who share so much. Science matters a great deal to me. Link: http://www.hurricanescience.org/science/forecast/models/
4 likes   
The MOST memorable :double: : Betsy, Camille, Elena, Georges, Katrina, Isaac, Zeta

emeraldislenc
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 559
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:49 pm
Location: Emerald Isle NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#407 Postby emeraldislenc » Mon Aug 14, 2017 8:00 pm

What type of trend?
0 likes   

Socalhurcnegirl227
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 267
Age: 36
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:39 pm
Location: Santa Barbara, CA

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#408 Postby Socalhurcnegirl227 » Mon Aug 14, 2017 9:30 pm

Ive noticed that while the upgrades have made it slightly more difficult, this trough pattern has also made it difficult, last year i remember the models moving the trough in and then nothing, it got to the point where it became a joke with that "magic trough"
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5313
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#409 Postby Ptarmigan » Mon Aug 14, 2017 10:19 pm

I saw the HWFI have 91L as a Category 5 hurricane. :eek: :double:

http://www.ral.ucar.edu/hurricanes/real ... _early.png
1 likes   

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#410 Postby blp » Mon Aug 14, 2017 10:25 pm

Ptarmigan wrote:I saw the HWFI have 91L as a Category 5 hurricane. :eek: :double:

http://www.ral.ucar.edu/hurricanes/real ... _early.png


Yes it looks vicious.

Image
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#411 Postby Hurricaneman » Mon Aug 14, 2017 10:26 pm

Ptarmigan wrote:I saw the HWFI have 91L as a Category 5 hurricane. :eek: :double:

http://www.ral.ucar.edu/hurricanes/real ... _early.png

All the intensity models have a hurricane in 96 hrs but I feel that's too bullish
1 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#412 Postby Hurricaneman » Mon Aug 14, 2017 10:37 pm

The 0zGFS has 2 separate systems and look separate enough not to fujiwara or impinge on each other
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5313
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#413 Postby Ptarmigan » Mon Aug 14, 2017 10:39 pm

blp wrote:
Ptarmigan wrote:I saw the HWFI have 91L as a Category 5 hurricane. :eek: :double:

http://www.ral.ucar.edu/hurricanes/real ... _early.png


Yes it looks vicious.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/04 ... 9410c2.png


Hurricaneman wrote:
Ptarmigan wrote:I saw the HWFI have 91L as a Category 5 hurricane. :eek: :double:

http://www.ral.ucar.edu/hurricanes/real ... _early.png

All the intensity models have a hurricane in 96 hrs but I feel that's too bullish


That is what I am thinking too.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#414 Postby Alyono » Mon Aug 14, 2017 10:39 pm

blp wrote:
Ptarmigan wrote:I saw the HWFI have 91L as a Category 5 hurricane. :eek: :double:

http://www.ral.ucar.edu/hurricanes/real ... _early.png


Yes it looks vicious.

Image


NOT VALID!!!

Too close to the lateral boundary
1 likes   

JPmia
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 11:01 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#415 Postby JPmia » Mon Aug 14, 2017 10:45 pm

Alyono wrote:
blp wrote:
Ptarmigan wrote:I saw the HWFI have 91L as a Category 5 hurricane. :eek: :double:

http://www.ral.ucar.edu/hurricanes/real ... _early.png


Yes it looks vicious.

Image


NOT VALID!!!

Too close to the lateral boundary


hey can you tone it down a little? I have no idea what you're saying and all caps in red letters doesn't help.
6 likes   

Socalhurcnegirl227
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 267
Age: 36
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:39 pm
Location: Santa Barbara, CA

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#416 Postby Socalhurcnegirl227 » Mon Aug 14, 2017 10:47 pm

gatorcane wrote:Models have shifted south or either dropped this:

Image

That run over SFL into the gulf would analog Katrina
0 likes   
"I'm a wandress, i'm a one night stand,
dont belong to no city, dont belong to no man
i'm the violence in the pouring rain,
I'm a hurricane"

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#417 Postby floridasun78 » Mon Aug 14, 2017 10:48 pm

blp wrote:
Ptarmigan wrote:I saw the HWFI have 91L as a Category 5 hurricane. :eek: :double:

http://www.ral.ucar.edu/hurricanes/real ... _early.png


Yes it looks vicious.

Image

that wont be good Haiti but i think that models over do it put we part season we could see strong hurr
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#418 Postby SouthFLTropics » Mon Aug 14, 2017 11:00 pm

Some fairly big changes on the 00z GFS. The Eastern wave is farther South this run and the Western wave is farther west...looks to be enough separation for two separate entities.
0 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#419 Postby Alyono » Mon Aug 14, 2017 11:03 pm

neither become a TC. Not only is there SAL, but there are upper lows according to the GFS
1 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#420 Postby Hurricaneman » Mon Aug 14, 2017 11:04 pm

SouthFLTropics wrote:Some fairly big changes on the 00z GFS. The Eastern wave is farther South this run and the Western wave is farther west...looks to be enough separation for two separate entities.

Imagine if this system became Harvey north of the islands while Irma forms from the western vortex and goes through the Caribbean
1 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Stormybajan and 9 guests