ATL: TEN - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#201 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:35 pm

Wow the Atlantic must be hostile, as evidence by the fact that this system, as well as 93L are weak even as they pass north of the islands. So much for great conditions. If only they were in the BOC or in the middle of the Atlantic. :lol: This could be the story all season. Models seem to be backing off developing this system.
0 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#202 Postby SouthFLTropics » Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:52 pm

Trough swinging in...off to the northern Gulf Coast 92L will go.

Image
0 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#203 Postby gatorcane » Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:56 pm

Tightening consensus with a track just north of the islands but still lots of uncertainty with 92L:

Image
0 likes   

coreyl
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 77
Age: 36
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 9:14 pm
Location: Bay St Louis,Mississippi

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#204 Postby coreyl » Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:03 pm

We've seen enough rain this summer here in south Mississippi and New Orleans area but obviously if in future models it starts to show strengthening that's a different story
2 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9620
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#205 Postby Steve » Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:11 pm

tarheelprogrammer wrote:Wow the Atlantic must be hostile, as evidence by the fact that this system, as well as 93L are weak even as they pass north of the islands. So much for great conditions. If only they were in the BOC or in the middle of the Atlantic. :lol: This could be the story all season. Models seem to be backing off developing this system.


It's the model thread. But has anyone said "Great Conditions" or is that just something you're saying we're not currently experiencing? If so, please direct me to that as I'd love to read whomever would post that the Atlantic's conditions are great just to see for myself. I really don't recall anyone saying that conditions were "great". I mean they are in some places I'm sure.
----------------------------------------------------------
I'm not sure about 91L/92L modeling. I kind of agree that 91L is a southern runner and 92L would come up farther north. It usually works that way. But 91l buried into Central America vs. Bay of Campeche could be the difference between a recurve/FL hit or Gulf storm with 92L. I don't have a good feel yet for how north 91L breaks.
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#206 Postby Bocadude85 » Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:11 pm

What the 12z Euro showed today may be a trend towards showing development in the vicinity of the Bahamas, the Euro showed the same thing with Gert before it jumped on the development bandwagon a few runs later.
1 likes   

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#207 Postby SouthFLTropics » Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:13 pm

gatorcane wrote:Tightening consensus with a track just north of the islands but still lots of uncertainty with 92L:

Image


That's about as tight a cluster as you'll ever see at 144 hours. I think the track is pretty laid out unless something dramatic changes. What form it decides to take is the question.
0 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4822
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#208 Postby ronjon » Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:14 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#209 Postby gatorcane » Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:16 pm

One thing to watch for is the possible recurve in the vicinity of Cuba/Florida/Eastern Gulf. The 12Z Euro is pretty close to the 00Z Euro out through about 168 hours but on the 12Z run it recurves the system rather abruptly north then NE in the SE GOM near the west coast of Florida.

There looks to be a potent Upper-Low that will move through the Great Lakes and SE Canada in about a week that greatly erodes the Bermuda High ridge over the Bahamas and Florida. It is still not out of the question that this could recurve before reaching Florida too if it develops but it could just as easily recurve after moving past Florida. As always it will come down to timing.

12Z ECMWF 144-240 hour animation:
Image
Last edited by gatorcane on Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#210 Postby blp » Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:22 pm

Bocadude85 wrote:What the 12z Euro showed today may be a trend towards showing development in the vicinity of the Bahamas, the Euro showed the same thing with Gert before it jumped on the development bandwagon a few runs later.


Good point. The trend has been in the models to overdo the hostile conditions in that area in the mid range.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#211 Postby tolakram » Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:25 pm

Another run that shows the wave getting into the gulf and then some development. It's going to be an interesting week for sure. I do not believe conditions are so hostile that nothing develops between now and the wave entering the eastern gulf, and it's too far out to really predict conditions anyway.
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4822
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#212 Postby ronjon » Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:49 pm

tolakram wrote:Another run that shows the wave getting into the gulf and then some development. It's going to be an interesting week for sure. I do not believe conditions are so hostile that nothing develops between now and the wave entering the eastern gulf, and it's too far out to really predict conditions anyway.


Really good point - you'd almost have to give climatology equal if not greater weight at this point after a weeks time on these model runs. The idea that we'd have some vorticity in the GOM in late August is concerning.
0 likes   

OuterBanker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1731
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:53 am
Location: Nags Head, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#213 Postby OuterBanker » Wed Aug 16, 2017 3:08 pm

Seems plausible. Also shows 93L as fish food just making it to 60 w before going ots. I would venture a guess that because 92 l is weaker around 60 w it doesn't pulled up in the weakness like 93 l.
Or, 93 l is at a higher latitude when it gets to 60 w. Really not sure which scenario it sees.
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5300
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#214 Postby Nimbus » Wed Aug 16, 2017 3:27 pm

These computer models are limited by random changes to the atmosphere, they can only be deterministic to a certain degree.

With three tropical systems there is likely to be a lot more uncertainty in the forecast.
The upper air troughs and ridges respond to the heat energy driven vortexes in ways that can only partially be determined so errors compound quickly.

Models that have some value at 10 days under quiet tropical conditions are probably worthless with our current condition. The statistical advantage of forecasting at that range would be like trying to count into a six deck shoe.
2 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#215 Postby gatorcane » Wed Aug 16, 2017 3:43 pm

12Z HWRF-P shows some organization when the run ends as it heads W to WNW towards Bahamas:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#216 Postby gatorcane » Wed Aug 16, 2017 3:47 pm

12Z GFS ensembles. Notice the hook north at the end. Of course a lot of GFS ensembles do not develop this and those that do are not particularly strong:

Image
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#217 Postby Alyono » Wed Aug 16, 2017 3:49 pm

gatorcane wrote:12Z HWRF-P shows some organization when the run ends as it heads W to WNW towards Bahamas:

Image


you CANNOT use the parent grid. Different physics. That is not a valid model
0 likes   

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#218 Postby blp » Wed Aug 16, 2017 3:51 pm

12Z Ukmet. Big shift SW from 00z now over Cuba. It would be much stronger if not for land interaction. I think the ridge will keep this one from recurve.

Image
Last edited by blp on Wed Aug 16, 2017 3:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Emmett_Brown
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1432
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Sarasota FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#219 Postby Emmett_Brown » Wed Aug 16, 2017 3:52 pm

Alyono wrote:
gatorcane wrote:12Z HWRF-P shows some organization when the run ends as it heads W to WNW towards Bahamas:

Image


you CANNOT use the parent grid. Different physics. That is not a valid model


Glad you brought this up... parent grid was confusing me. What is it for, and which one should we be using?
0 likes   

User avatar
Emmett_Brown
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1432
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Sarasota FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#220 Postby Emmett_Brown » Wed Aug 16, 2017 3:55 pm

Nimbus wrote:These computer models are limited by random changes to the atmosphere, they can only be deterministic to a certain degree.

With three tropical systems there is likely to be a lot more uncertainty in the forecast.
The upper air troughs and ridges respond to the heat energy driven vortexes in ways that can only partially be determined so errors compound quickly.

Models that have some value at 10 days under quiet tropical conditions are probably worthless with our current condition. The statistical advantage of forecasting at that range would be like trying to count into a six deck shoe.


I'm not an expert in fluid dynamics (although I had to consider it when building my time machine). But I would tend to agree with you that if 3 TC's form in the same neighborhood, their paths would probably affect each other a bit and make track forecasts extra tricky and unpredictable.
1 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests