ATL: TEN - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10140
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#161 Postby Blown Away » Thu Aug 17, 2017 8:05 am

Image
Shear drops off after 72 hours...
1 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 49
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#162 Postby SouthFLTropics » Thu Aug 17, 2017 8:08 am

:uarrow: Yep...and look at that uptick in SST's. The recipe for a bomb is there just waiting to happen.
0 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10162
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#163 Postby SFLcane » Thu Aug 17, 2017 8:12 am

interesting guys...thx for posting the ships output. watching closely
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10140
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#164 Postby Blown Away » Thu Aug 17, 2017 8:14 am

Image
Image
12z...
Slight general uptick in intensity models late
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7177
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#165 Postby jlauderdal » Thu Aug 17, 2017 8:16 am

Blown Away wrote:Image
Image
12z...
Slight general uptick in intensity models late


still very weak, lets see if they trend up next 24 hours
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7177
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#166 Postby jlauderdal » Thu Aug 17, 2017 8:17 am

Blown Away wrote:Image
Shear drops off after 72 hours...


this has remained consistent now for a couple of days...track guidance consistent too we should know by sunday if we have are going to have a hurricane to deal with in the united states
1 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10140
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#167 Postby Blown Away » Thu Aug 17, 2017 8:23 am

Image
12z Ships... Little stronger late and not as strong as 06z from @36-72 hrs... Not an exact science IMO...
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7349
Age: 44
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#168 Postby Hurricaneman » Thu Aug 17, 2017 8:27 am

Blown Away wrote:Image
12z Ships... Little stronger late and not as strong as 06z from @36-72 hrs... Not an exact science IMO...

What I'm also seeing is lower shear than in previous runs
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4811
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#169 Postby ronjon » Thu Aug 17, 2017 8:39 am

We shouldn't get too hung up on the actual forecast values of shear - they have been notoriously inaccurate but I think looking for trends in the shear forecasts (are they decreasing or increasing on certain days with successive model runs) can be meaningful.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23689
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#170 Postby gatorcane » Thu Aug 17, 2017 8:41 am

Latest floater below. It has a good structure/vorticity and looks to be gaining some latitude. That means it could miss the Lesser Antilles and possibly the Greater Antilles to the north. I find it hard to believe this won't become something once it nears the Bahamas. We need to watch this one closely:

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... display=12
Last edited by gatorcane on Thu Aug 17, 2017 8:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#171 Postby SouthDadeFish » Thu Aug 17, 2017 8:44 am

Over the past two days, the GFS has changed its tune in regard to the interaction with the TUTT/PV streamer. It now looks like the PV streamer will be slightly farther from the TC than what was forecast a couple of days ago, which will slightly lessen the vertical wind shear compared to earlier forecasts. The disturbance is holding its own so far against the SAL to the north. As SSTs warm in the path of 92L, it should be able to better equipped to fight off the dry air. If the vortex remains somewhat intact after its dance with the PV streamer, it will need to be watched for development north of the Antilles, if it's not already a TC by then.
4 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 19990
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#172 Postby tolakram » Thu Aug 17, 2017 8:44 am

0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4811
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#173 Postby ronjon » Thu Aug 17, 2017 8:45 am

gatorcane wrote:Latest floater below. It has a good structure/vorticity and looks to be gaining some latitude. That means it could miss the Lesser Antilles and possibly the Greater Antilles to the north. I find it hard to believe this won't become something once it nears the Bahamas or possibly sooner.

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... display=12


Will be encountering warmer ocean temps too as it nears 50W - think the stable dry air surrounding the system has held it in check so far. its got a good circulation.
1 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7349
Age: 44
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#174 Postby Hurricaneman » Thu Aug 17, 2017 8:55 am

I wouldn't be surprised to see recon go out to this one by tomorrow if it continues to organize
1 likes   

User avatar
MississippiWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1696
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#175 Postby MississippiWx » Thu Aug 17, 2017 8:55 am

ronjon wrote:
gatorcane wrote:Latest floater below. It has a good structure/vorticity and looks to be gaining some latitude. That means it could miss the Lesser Antilles and possibly the Greater Antilles to the north. I find it hard to believe this won't become something once it nears the Bahamas or possibly sooner.

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... display=12


Will be encountering warmer ocean temps too as it nears 50W - think the stable dry air surrounding the system has held it in check so far. its got a good circulation.


Yeah, you can see the stratocumulus deck it is embedded within which is a tell-tale sign that stable air is limiting development. Development chances should increase once it clears the islands to the north. The TUTT or PV streamer nearby can actually help to initiate the convection it needs similar to what happened with Gert before it became a tropical cyclone.
0 likes   
This post is not an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of MississippiWx and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 49
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#176 Postby SouthFLTropics » Thu Aug 17, 2017 9:03 am

MississippiWx wrote:
ronjon wrote:
gatorcane wrote:Latest floater below. It has a good structure/vorticity and looks to be gaining some latitude. That means it could miss the Lesser Antilles and possibly the Greater Antilles to the north. I find it hard to believe this won't become something once it nears the Bahamas or possibly sooner.

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... display=12


Will be encountering warmer ocean temps too as it nears 50W - think the stable dry air surrounding the system has held it in check so far. its got a good circulation.


Yeah, you can see the stratocumulus deck it is embedded within which is a tell-tale sign that stable air is limiting development. Development chances should increase once it clears the islands to the north. The TUTT or PV streamer nearby can actually help to initiate the convection it needs similar to what happened with Gert before it became a tropical cyclone.


Look at how the TUTT is enhancing convection above Hispaniola and Puerto Rico at this moment. That is a HUGE blowup of convection across that area. Models be damned, I really don't have a good feeling about the potential that 92L has.
2 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

OuterBanker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1728
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:53 am
Location: Nags Head, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#177 Postby OuterBanker » Thu Aug 17, 2017 9:10 am



Thanks Tolakram. What a wonderful link. Lots to play with and unmatched resolution.

You should see it on a 4k 65 with cable modem.

Never even thought this would be available to the general public. Wow!
1 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23689
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#178 Postby gatorcane » Thu Aug 17, 2017 9:35 am

looks like some convection is on the increase. This would likely become Irma instead of Harvey. I just don't like the sound of that name..."Irma" :eek:

Image
2 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#179 Postby Bocadude85 » Thu Aug 17, 2017 9:40 am

Development chances have been upped. 8AM TWO below.


2. Shower activity associated with a second area of low pressure
located about midway between the coast of Africa and the Lesser
Antilles has also become a little better organized during the past
24 hours. Continued gradual development of this system is possible
during the next couple of days while it moves west-northwestward at
15 to 20 mph, but upper-level winds are expected to become less
conducive for tropical cyclone formation when the disturbance moves
north of the Leeward Islands this weekend.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...medium...50 percent.
* Formation chance through 5 days...medium...60 percent.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23689
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#180 Postby gatorcane » Thu Aug 17, 2017 9:42 am

The TUTT in the Eastern Bahamas is definitely moving west. The upper-low north of 92L with the shear the models think could severely disruption 92l is slowly moving SSW. Doesn't seem to be making that much progress:

Image
1 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests