TheStormExpert wrote:blp wrote:Lots of similarities with Gert. Take a look at what was said back when 99l pre Gert was in the same area with no model support from Euro or GFS.
Page 60
http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=85&t=118925&start=1180
But model support was on and off whereas with 92L the GFS and Euro haven't shown development in days!
ATL: TEN - Post-Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
18z gfs developed it off the east coast
0 likes
- BeRad954
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 17
- Age: 35
- Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 11:19 am
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
Miami Storm Tracker wrote:anyone else having issues with the floater for 92L
Try the GOES 16 SLIDER site, awesome addition!
http://rammb-slider.cira.colostate.edu/ ... mmb-slider
1 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. Please refer to the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- Miami Storm Tracker
- Category 4
- Posts: 909
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 10:12 pm
- Location: Key Largo, Fla.
- Contact:
-
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 6:12 am
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
I'm really not sure what to think at this moment. If 92L does somehow make it and develop, I can't imagine it being anything more than a weak tropical storm.
0 likes
- Hurricaneman
- Category 5
- Posts: 7350
- Age: 44
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
- Location: central florida
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
Looks like it's consolidating near the 850 vortex and may be trying to form some kind of surface reflection there too, it's also in a low shear environment with the ULL moving to its north not at it but in tandem which could keep the shear low until Florida if that continues so those that are writing this off might be surprised by Monday or sooner
2 likes
- Hurricaneman
- Category 5
- Posts: 7350
- Age: 44
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
- Location: central florida
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
With model support I predict the chances go up to 30% for 2 days and 50% for 5 days
1 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
Firing popcorn convection and shear seems low. This can lower the pressures and it is a process that could lead to development.
0 likes
- AtlanticWind
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1885
- Age: 66
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 9:57 pm
- Location: Plantation,Fla
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
Hurricaneman wrote:With model support I predict the chances go up to 30% for 2 days and 50% for 5 days
Nope at 10/20
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4029
- Age: 28
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
- Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
It has 500-600 miles to consolidate and intensify, plenty of time.
1 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
Hurricaneman wrote:Looks like it's consolidating near the 850 vortex and may be trying to form some kind of surface reflection there too, it's also in a low shear environment with the ULL moving to its north not at it but in tandem which could keep the shear low until Florida if that continues so those that are writing this off might be surprised by Monday or sooner
The wave does look very healthy tonight! Looking at sat, seems like it's trying to develop a center further south than model runs initialize. Don't know if that's what you mean when you say the 850 mb area. Anyway, if it's does organize near the south end of convection, I don't know if that would have an impact on a possible S Fl landfall. But I like the way it looks tonight.

0 likes
-
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 192
- Age: 23
- Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2017 7:38 am
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
stormreader wrote:Hurricaneman wrote:Looks like it's consolidating near the 850 vortex and may be trying to form some kind of surface reflection there too, it's also in a low shear environment with the ULL moving to its north not at it but in tandem which could keep the shear low until Florida if that continues so those that are writing this off might be surprised by Monday or sooner
The wave does look very healthy tonight! Looking at sat, seems like it's trying to develop a center further south than model runs initialize. Don't know if that's what you mean when you say the 850 mb area. Anyway, if it's does organize near the south end of convection, I don't know if that would have an impact on a possible S Fl landfall. But I like the way it looks tonight.
It seems 92L seems to face what Gert has happened before: competing south and north vorticities.
1 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
The second ULL is starting to fill in so it looks like another Gert scenario.
Track is closer to Florida this time and maybe a little slower so might have a chance at becoming a hurricane before the north turn.
Track is closer to Florida this time and maybe a little slower so might have a chance at becoming a hurricane before the north turn.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
Another GFS fail.
It was supposed to get wiped by the 355K PV streamer at this position.
NOT.
Now its on the SW side of the ULL - classic position for development.
Convection firing off.
However, some mid-level dry air to the west it needs to shake off.
It was supposed to get wiped by the 355K PV streamer at this position.
NOT.
Now its on the SW side of the ULL - classic position for development.
Convection firing off.
However, some mid-level dry air to the west it needs to shake off.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
Looks like a hot tower fired off near DMAX very close to the CoC.
Leaving a large area of cirrus in its wake.
Leaving a large area of cirrus in its wake.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 7177
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
GCANE wrote:Another GFS fail.
It was supposed to get wiped by the 355K PV streamer at this position.
NOT.
Now its on the SW side of the ULL - classic position for development.
Convection firing off.
However, some mid-level dry air to the west it needs to shake off.
im hugging nhc probabilities in the next few two's regardless of what models show either way
0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 143925
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
8 AM TWO:
A trough of low pressure located a couple of hundred miles north of
Puerto Rico continues to produce disorganized showers and
thunderstorms. Environmental conditions are expected to be
unfavorable for development of this system during the next couple of
days, but they could become slightly more conducive for development
by midweek when the system is near the northwestern Bahamas or
Florida.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...low...10 percent.
* Formation chance through 5 days...low...20 percent.
Puerto Rico continues to produce disorganized showers and
thunderstorms. Environmental conditions are expected to be
unfavorable for development of this system during the next couple of
days, but they could become slightly more conducive for development
by midweek when the system is near the northwestern Bahamas or
Florida.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...low...10 percent.
* Formation chance through 5 days...low...20 percent.
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
NHC probs look a little low considering the heavy convection and apparent circulation on the north side of the wave. Shear looks to have decreased too.
1 likes
- Emmett_Brown
- Category 5
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
- Location: Sarasota FL
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
Convection looking slightly more consolidated. First couple of frames of Vis satellite show perhaps a weak LLC near 22.2N, 67.1W?
1 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 7177
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
ronjon wrote:NHC probs look a little low considering the heavy convection and apparent circulation on the north side of the wave. Shear looks to have decreased too.
seems a little low considering its hanging tough and conditions appear to be improving over time..guess they are banking on this thing weakening to the point that it well be weakened to the point it cant take advantage of better conditions ahead
2 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
ronjon wrote:NHC probs look a little low considering the heavy convection and apparent circulation on the north side of the wave. Shear looks to have decreased too.
Yup

1 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests