ATL: HARVEY - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2776
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
Contact:

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1641 Postby Frank P » Tue Aug 22, 2017 6:23 pm

Joe B just posted this on FB.. so I guess its out for the public... Looks like a Cat 2 into CC... never does make it back in the GOM..
Image
0 likes   

Thetxhurricanemaster
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 279
Age: 34
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 6:53 pm
Location: Corpus christi

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1642 Postby Thetxhurricanemaster » Tue Aug 22, 2017 6:24 pm

Frank P wrote:Joe B just posted this on FB.. so I guess its out for the public... Looks like a Cat 2 into CC... never does make it back in the GOM.


I agree with that 100% except I expect it to move slower over land maybe stall over texas
0 likes   

stormlover2013

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1643 Postby stormlover2013 » Tue Aug 22, 2017 6:25 pm

going to be a horrible flooding event for houston, Beaumont, and Lake charles !!
0 likes   

hd44

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1644 Postby hd44 » Tue Aug 22, 2017 6:26 pm

All models have this going back over water except for the Ukmet... that has to be incorporated into the forecast.
0 likes   

User avatar
perk
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 825
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:35 am
Location: Richmond Texas

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1645 Postby perk » Tue Aug 22, 2017 6:26 pm

msp wrote:18z HWRF hits baffin bay south of corpus at 971mb



Very similar to the previous run.
0 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1646 Postby stormreader » Tue Aug 22, 2017 6:28 pm

stormlover2013 wrote:https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=navgem&region=us&pkg=z500a&runtime=2017082218&fh=96&xpos=0&ypos=170

navy

Makes a late N move just offshore and then up into Matagorda Bay for landfall. Seems reasonable.
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5305
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1647 Postby Nimbus » Tue Aug 22, 2017 6:31 pm

That is a much earlier posting by Joe B look at the graphics.
Hard to predict stall events but the track Joe outlined would still drive the storm surge with the same intensity as if it were offshore.
1 likes   

stormlover2013

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1648 Postby stormlover2013 » Tue Aug 22, 2017 6:33 pm

0 likes   

weatherguy425
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX > Lubbock, TX > Savannah, GA
Contact:

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1649 Postby weatherguy425 » Tue Aug 22, 2017 6:36 pm

Nimbus wrote:That is a much earlier posting by Joe B look at the graphics.
Hard to predict stall events but the track Joe outlined would still drive the storm surge with the same intensity as if it were offshore.


Graphic may have been drawn earlier but tweet was late this afternoon. As you mentioned, with a lack of steering, post-landfall track is almost a fool's guess at this point. Though, more likely to ride just inland, than just offshore. Physics win. IMO.

*Not an official forecast*
Last edited by weatherguy425 on Tue Aug 22, 2017 6:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1650 Postby stormreader » Tue Aug 22, 2017 6:37 pm

Thetxhurricanemaster wrote:
Frank P wrote:Joe B just posted this on FB.. so I guess its out for the public... Looks like a Cat 2 into CC... never does make it back in the GOM.


I agree with that 100% except I expect it to move slower over land maybe stall over texas


Also very reasonable. But look at the small margin of error between this making a S Texas landfall, and staying just offshore, or paralleling the coast, until a landfall along the upper reaches of the Texas coast. What I'm wondering about mainline models which have deep penetration of Texas, then an exit off coast, and very quick regeneration, is if they might be picking up on a Cat 2 storm just off E Texas and SW La, because perhaps, the storm at that point had never really made a landfall. Instead, it simply slow moved in the coastal waters and was running at about Cat 2 strength in the Sabine Pass area???? Big question.....Will GFS and Euro with in and out solution still be there in 24 hours or so??? Or will it look more like Joe B.'s or the UKMET or NAM, opr perhaps that Navy model?
0 likes   

User avatar
msp
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 4:58 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1651 Postby msp » Tue Aug 22, 2017 6:41 pm

stormlover2013 wrote:https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=navgem&region=watl&pkg=mslp_pcpn&runtime=2017082218&fh=144&xpos=0&ypos=100

navy


same position at 96hrs as its 12z, just stronger now
0 likes   

User avatar
mcheer23
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 436
Age: 32
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:24 pm
Location: Sugar Land, Texas

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1652 Postby mcheer23 » Tue Aug 22, 2017 6:42 pm

First 00z models come out in an hour
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20012
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1653 Postby tolakram » Tue Aug 22, 2017 6:48 pm

Thetxhurricanemaster wrote:
Frank P wrote:Joe B just posted this on FB.. so I guess its out for the public... Looks like a Cat 2 into CC... never does make it back in the GOM..
[ img]https://image.ibb.co/d5eNcQ/DH3fs_N5_Ws_AMkakv.jpg[/img]

I agree with that 100% except I expect it to move slower over land maybe stall over texas


I am not aware of any model that shows it stalling.
1 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

bamajammer4eva
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 907
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 3:21 am
Location: Ozark, AL

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1654 Postby bamajammer4eva » Tue Aug 22, 2017 6:51 pm

Frank P wrote:Joe B just posted this on FB.. so I guess its out for the public... Looks like a Cat 2 into CC... never does make it back in the GOM.


Wonder why he thinks it would still be 55kts after spending a couple of days over land unless he is looking at the models that bring it back over water for his intensity and using his own track which keeps it inland.
0 likes   

Thetxhurricanemaster
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 279
Age: 34
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 6:53 pm
Location: Corpus christi

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1655 Postby Thetxhurricanemaster » Tue Aug 22, 2017 6:52 pm

tolakram wrote:
Thetxhurricanemaster wrote:
Frank P wrote:Joe B just posted this on FB.. so I guess its out for the public... Looks like a Cat 2 into CC... never does make it back in the GOM.

I agree with that 100% except I expect it to move slower over land maybe stall over texas


I am not aware of any model that shows it stalling.


Umm I meant stallingredients as in what the GFS and EURO shows a one day stall then movement to the ENE towards LA
1 likes   

Craters
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 421
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:34 pm
Location: Alvin, TX (south of Houston)

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1656 Postby Craters » Tue Aug 22, 2017 7:09 pm

Alyono wrote:
South Texas Storms wrote:This run of the GFS doesn't have the GIV data in it. Hopefully we will get at least some of that data in the 0z runs tonight.


yes it does. About half the sondes make it into the 18Z run. Generally, drops before 21Z go into the 18Z run


Alyono -- Sorry to bring this up again, but I'm a little confused. I'm sure I'm missing something, but how can a drop at, say, 20Z go into a model run that's timestamped two hours earlier? Relativistic modeling, maybe?

Thanks...
0 likes   
Nothing that I post here should ever be treated as a forecast or anything resembling one. Please check with your local NWS office or the NHC for forecasts, watches, and warnings.

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1657 Postby gatorcane » Tue Aug 22, 2017 7:09 pm

18Z NAVGEM:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1658 Postby ROCK » Tue Aug 22, 2017 7:15 pm

NAVGEM is more upper coast than mid. Hard to tell. They are all right around the same area now or very close
0 likes   

Craters
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 421
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:34 pm
Location: Alvin, TX (south of Houston)

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1659 Postby Craters » Tue Aug 22, 2017 7:17 pm

stormreader wrote:
That NAM is very close to my thinking (maybe I should be embarrassed to say that....) Steve says the NAM is not worth much for a storm below 25N. Still below 25 N but not much now. Moving out of deep tropics shortly and into subtropics, and, more importantly, continental weather, with its diving troughs and shifting ridges. Also, the NAM a couple of days ago was the only model that had the storm pretty much in its current position coming off the northern coast of the Yucatan. When others had this bound for Tampico, NAM had storm move NW over the penninsula and come off as now off the NW corner. If not exact it was pretty close. It did not have this as a BOC storm, and its not.


Didn't the NAM (or was it the NAVGEM?) do a real good job on a storm near Florida last year, start to finish, when all of the other models missed it?
0 likes   
Nothing that I post here should ever be treated as a forecast or anything resembling one. Please check with your local NWS office or the NHC for forecasts, watches, and warnings.

User avatar
Rgv20
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2466
Age: 39
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:42 pm
Location: Edinburg/McAllen Tx

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1660 Postby Rgv20 » Tue Aug 22, 2017 7:22 pm

stormreader wrote:
Frank P wrote:
ROCK wrote:didn't see the 18Z NAM on here...

https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=100

Gotta be the eastern outlier... but interesting no less


That NAM is very close to my thinking (maybe I should be embarrassed to say that....) Steve says the NAM is not worth much for a storm below 25N. Still below 25 N but not much now. Moving out of deep tropics shortly and into subtropics, and, more importantly, continental weather, with its diving troughs and shifting ridges. Also, the NAM a couple of days ago was the only model that had the storm pretty much in its current position coming off the northern coast of the Yucatan. When others had this bound for Tampico, NAM had storm move NW over the penninsula and come off as now off the NW corner. If not exact it was pretty close. It did not have this as a BOC storm, and its not.


NAM has her moments but I will be careful paying too much attention to it when dealing with TC. I do remember that in 2010 it did a good forecast or maybe guess of Hermine but I would stick with the big three ECMWF, GFS, and UKMET for tropical cyclones.
1 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests