ATL: HARVEY - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Dave C
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 4:36 pm
Location: Middleboro, Mass.(midway between Cape Cod and Boston)

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#2321 Postby Dave C » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:16 pm

I remember Bob Sheets saying how storms will drop pressure quickly then level off before next big pressure drop. Next few hrs will be something to watch.
1 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 16032
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#2322 Postby Kingarabian » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:16 pm

tolakram wrote:Looks like shear is increasing a bit, not sure if it's enough to keep strength down or not. Very little outflow on the SW side of the storm.

https://weather.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/get-abi?satellite=GOESEastconusband02&lat=25&lon=-94&width=1000&height=800&zoom=2&type=Animation&numframes=20&quality=92


Yeah it had that problem from earlier today when the RI began.

Also if it wants to become a major, the eyewall needs to do better.
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

Langinbang187

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#2323 Postby Langinbang187 » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:17 pm

Blinhart wrote:Is there a chance that this will drop down to the 880 pressure range, or will it stay above 900? I know a pressure of 900 would be catastrophic and could cause this system to bomb out even more than expected, but if somehow it drops below 900 I think this will be the most costly storm in history.


Can't see it. Pressure has already strangely leveled off.
0 likes   

Cuda
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 11:38 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#2324 Postby Cuda » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:17 pm

Blinhart wrote:Is there a chance that this will drop down to the 880 pressure range, or will it stay above 900? I know a pressure of 900 would be catastrophic and could cause this system to bomb out even more than expected, but if somehow it drops below 900 I think this will be the most costly storm in history.



I haven't seen any model runs or predictions that pressure would get THAT low, have you?
0 likes   

MaineWeatherNut
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:06 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#2325 Postby MaineWeatherNut » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:18 pm

And all this explosive development is taking place during the day... Usually these kinds of explosive development takes place at night so just watch it does come the over night hours unless something unexpected comes up to disrupt it.
0 likes   
The content of this post does NOT constitute official forecast and should not be used as such. They are the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or Storm2K. For official information, please refer to the local meteorological centers of respective areas.

MaineWeatherNut
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:06 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#2326 Postby MaineWeatherNut » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:19 pm

Cuda wrote:
Blinhart wrote:Is there a chance that this will drop down to the 880 pressure range, or will it stay above 900? I know a pressure of 900 would be catastrophic and could cause this system to bomb out even more than expected, but if somehow it drops below 900 I think this will be the most costly storm in history.



I haven't seen any model runs or predictions that pressure would get THAT low, have you?


Latest NAM i believe had it down to like 878mb or something like that.
0 likes   
The content of this post does NOT constitute official forecast and should not be used as such. They are the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or Storm2K. For official information, please refer to the local meteorological centers of respective areas.

davidiowx
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 390
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:07 am
Location: Richmond, TX

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#2327 Postby davidiowx » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:19 pm

MaineWeatherNut wrote:
Cuda wrote:
Blinhart wrote:Is there a chance that this will drop down to the 880 pressure range, or will it stay above 900? I know a pressure of 900 would be catastrophic and could cause this system to bomb out even more than expected, but if somehow it drops below 900 I think this will be the most costly storm in history.



I haven't seen any model runs or predictions that pressure would get THAT low, have you?


Latest NAM i believe had it down to like 878mb or something like that.


It's the NAM...
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4829
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#2328 Postby ronjon » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:19 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 16032
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#2329 Postby Kingarabian » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:20 pm

You need time and near perfect conditions to get a Cat.5 and a sub 900mb pressure. Harvey has neither.
1 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

davidiowx
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 390
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:07 am
Location: Richmond, TX

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#2330 Postby davidiowx » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:20 pm

Kingarabian wrote:You need time and near perfect conditions to get a Cat.5 and a sub 900mb pressure. Harvey has neither.


Time? Probably not.... Perfect Conditions? Absolutely. It is in a really good environment for RI.
0 likes   

Dave C
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 4:36 pm
Location: Middleboro, Mass.(midway between Cape Cod and Boston)

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#2331 Postby Dave C » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:21 pm

tolakram wrote:Looks like shear is increasing a bit, not sure if it's enough to keep strength down or not. Very little outflow on the SW side of the storm.

https://weather.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/get-abi?satellite=GOESEastconusband02&lat=25&lon=-94&width=1000&height=800&zoom=2&type=Animation&numframes=20&quality=92

Look at the infrared loop, its outflow shows up better on the sw flank but is a little less robust there agreed.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#2332 Postby KWT » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:22 pm

Dave C wrote:I remember Bob Sheets saying how storms will drop pressure quickly then level off before next big pressure drop. Next few hrs will be something to watch.


Yeah I wouldn't be surprised if that happens, typically once they open their eyes you'll see a decent pressure drop with these systems.

With that being said it hasn't got the greatest IR presentation on that southern side, looking a little squished.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#2333 Postby KWT » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:23 pm

MaineWeatherNut wrote:
Cuda wrote:
Blinhart wrote:Is there a chance that this will drop down to the 880 pressure range, or will it stay above 900? I know a pressure of 900 would be catastrophic and could cause this system to bomb out even more than expected, but if somehow it drops below 900 I think this will be the most costly storm in history.



I haven't seen any model runs or predictions that pressure would get THAT low, have you?


Latest NAM i believe had it down to like 878mb or something like that.


NAM shouldn't be used for tropical cyclones, and I'd be surprised if it goes anywhere close to sub 900mbs, this neck of the Gulf tends to bottom out in the 920-935mbs range usually, but who knows!
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 16032
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#2334 Postby Kingarabian » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:24 pm

davidiowx wrote:
Kingarabian wrote:You need time and near perfect conditions to get a Cat.5 and a sub 900mb pressure. Harvey has neither.


Time? Probably not.... Perfect Conditions? Absolutely. It is in a really good environment for RI.


There are some dry air issues and outflow is restricted to the S/SW. Take a look at past Pacific cat.5 hurricanes and compare them with Harvey. Or just look at the bad boys from 2005.
Last edited by Kingarabian on Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11509
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#2335 Postby GCANE » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:24 pm

Another new tower firing up.

Image
3 likes   

User avatar
Cunxi Huang
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 329
Age: 27
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:17 pm
Location: San Jose, CA
Contact:

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#2336 Postby Cunxi Huang » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:25 pm

Cuda wrote:
Blinhart wrote:Is there a chance that this will drop down to the 880 pressure range, or will it stay above 900? I know a pressure of 900 would be catastrophic and could cause this system to bomb out even more than expected, but if somehow it drops below 900 I think this will be the most costly storm in history.



I haven't seen any model runs or predictions that pressure would get THAT low, have you?


This happens sometimes in West Pacific.
I remember ECMWF run onetime while forecasting typhoon Muifa in 2011. And it's the 1st time EC got a pressure lower than 900mb in my mind.
GFS happened a lot...i mean not a lot, but few times.
I have a screenshot that GFS run a 858 mb for cyclone Winston in South Pacific. But i can't find that screenshot.
0 likes   
06 SuTY SAOMAI | 09 TY LINFA | 10 TY FANAPI | 10 SuTY MEGI | 16 SuTY MERANTI | 19 SuTY LEKIMA | 24 C2 FRANCINE
DO NOT use my posts for life and death decisions. For official information, please refer to products from your RSMC and national weather agency.

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#2337 Postby txwatcher91 » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:26 pm

KWT wrote:
Dave C wrote:I remember Bob Sheets saying how storms will drop pressure quickly then level off before next big pressure drop. Next few hrs will be something to watch.


Yeah I wouldn't be surprised if that happens, typically once they open their eyes you'll see a decent pressure drop with these systems.

With that being said it hasn't got the greatest IR presentation on that southern side, looking a little squished.


Give it some time, we are at DMIN right now which is slowing things down a bit. Tonight will be a different story, pressure leveling off as expected before a big sudden drop occurs. I wouldn't be surprised to see this sub 920 by tomorrow morning and cat 4/5 winds.
1 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 16032
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#2338 Postby Kingarabian » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:26 pm

:uarrow: Fairly shallow from the south GCANE. CDO needs to expand and outflow to the south has to establish itself or else dry air will poke its nose.
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

MaineWeatherNut
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:06 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#2339 Postby MaineWeatherNut » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:26 pm

Kingarabian wrote:You need time and near perfect conditions to get a Cat.5 and a sub 900mb pressure. Harvey has neither.


lol Time? Wilma went from like a cat 1/2 in the evening to a Cat 5 in like 12 hours.
0 likes   
The content of this post does NOT constitute official forecast and should not be used as such. They are the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or Storm2K. For official information, please refer to the local meteorological centers of respective areas.

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Hurricane - Discussion

#2340 Postby KWT » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:27 pm

Kingarabian wrote:
davidiowx wrote:
Kingarabian wrote:You need time and near perfect conditions to get a Cat.5 and a sub 900mb pressure. Harvey has neither.


Time? Probably not.... Perfect Conditions? Absolutely. It is in a really good environment for RI.


There are some dry air issues and outflow is restricted to the S/SW. Take a look at past Pacific cat.5 hurricane and compare them with Harvey. Or just look at the bad boys from 2005.


Yeah I don't think conditions are perfect, very good but not perfect. Still it has got a decent amount of time left and given the steering currents to the north, its not going to be dragging in huge amounts of dry air from the USA even near landfall so could see strengthening right into landfall with this one.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests