ATL: HARVEY - Models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- Tropical Wave
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2010 12:28 am
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
ECMWF will be running in a little over 30 minutes.
So far it has been giving the most logical outcome in my opinion. Also the most consistent.
Very curious to see if it budges, but after seeing the 00Z NAM with the upper-level dropsonde information and how it mimicked the 12z ECMWF, I do not know why it would change now.
So far it has been giving the most logical outcome in my opinion. Also the most consistent.
Very curious to see if it budges, but after seeing the 00Z NAM with the upper-level dropsonde information and how it mimicked the 12z ECMWF, I do not know why it would change now.
1 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
Bottom half of the hour. Lots of stalls/washouts in South TX muddying up 00z scenarios.
0 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
HWRF back over water, BUT..
Lots of dry being pulled in and also centers are not stacked. So do not think much strengthening would occur if a route like this was taken.

Lots of dry being pulled in and also centers are not stacked. So do not think much strengthening would occur if a route like this was taken.

0 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
Navgem always fills in weird at Tropical Tidbits. After landfall it loops South TX and is offshore of Brownsville and South Padre at 84 hours. It's got a long way to go to update and fill in, but it joins other stall farther South models.
1 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
Steve wrote:Navgem always fills in weird at Tropical Tidbits. After landfall it loops South TX and is offshore of Brownsville and South Padre at 84 hours. It's got a long way to go to update and fill in, but it joins other stall farther South models.
Hour 102 offshore going NE. Might landfall again in TX or keep NE/NNE
1 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
Yeah. I didn't see that move on the navgem coming. It's basically at the same place it will be tomorrow at hour 84 but then has an E component between 84 and 102. Navgem doesn't go that far inland with landfall #1. EC should be rolling any second.
1 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
108hr NAVGEM looks to be working toward SETX. That's 4.5 days. Navgem then makes a move in just south of Galveston Bay and heads up to east Texas but then takes on a western component like it wants to do another loop.
0 likes
- Kingarabian
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 15828
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
- Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
Sunday 00z if we are looking for differences,
EC has not as strong of a ridge in the GULF which would make sense for why GFS wants to stall this out longer


EC has not as strong of a ridge in the GULF which would make sense for why GFS wants to stall this out longer


0 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
EC looking like its getting ready to swing out to sea in hour 72. Not seeing any differences besides stronger storm at first landfall.


0 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
Pretty big difference at hour 120 on ECMWF.
It does not look like it will get as far east this time when back over water. Looks like it might head for a second landfall around Houston
It does not look like it will get as far east this time when back over water. Looks like it might head for a second landfall around Houston
0 likes
- South Texas Storms
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4201
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
BRweather wrote:Pretty big difference at hour 120 on ECMWF.
It does not look like it will get as far east this time when back over water. Looks like it might head for a second landfall around Houston
Yep and that's after Houston has already had over a foot of rain on the Euro before the possible second landfall. What a nightmare scenario that would be.
1 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests