ATL: IRMA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#221 Postby TheStormExpert » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:29 pm

Ridge starting to weaken @144hrs.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
ColdMiser123
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 904
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
Location: Northeast US

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#222 Postby ColdMiser123 » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:31 pm

Euro now moving due west at hour 150.

Side note, looks like it is trying to develop a low in the BOC. A few GFS Ensembles hinted at this happening.
0 likes   
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#223 Postby SouthFLTropics » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:33 pm

That ridge isn't budging anytime soon...And worse, Texas seems to be getting inundated AGAIN at hour 144 along with something else trying to spin up in the BOC. Crazy!!!
0 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#224 Postby sma10 » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:36 pm

FWIW, in the 144hr range, excellent agreement in strength and placement between Euro/Uk at around 17-18N 50W
0 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5464
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#225 Postby chaser1 » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:36 pm

I beg to differ with you'all. While comparing the 12Z yesterday to today's 12Z, and looking at their respective 12Z Saturday verification times.... here is what I see. Today's run implies that Irma will be stronger than the prior EURO's comparative run. Also, if using the same Sat. 12Z verification time and comparing today's 12Z 96 hr. run to the 12 Z run from yesterday, this newest run places Irma at about 19.2 N and 41.0 W (as compared to the prior EURO 120 hr 12Z run where it would have been centered at 18.5 N & 45.6 W for the same verifying time period of 12Z Sat.). We're talking about a 1/2 degree difference in greater latitude and about 4 =/- degrees longitude. The synoptic set up is no different however and there is no reason that Irma should then suddenly go out to sea?? In fact, this is where the Atlantic High really begins to exert itself and where Irma begins a WSW motion I believe.
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

ace
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 3:11 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#226 Postby ace » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:36 pm

chaser1 wrote:Heres a link to the GFS from this a.m.
http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/

There looks to a new surge of energy entering the BOC in about 72 hr's. At 110 hrs pressures appear to drop throughout the W. Gulf. Somewhere around 210 hr.s was where I noticed a tropical system beginning to take shape. Remember.... it's the GFS so don't overly focus on the details as much as the potential trend


Got it! Thank you!
0 likes   

User avatar
meriland29
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:05 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#227 Postby meriland29 » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:38 pm

SouthFLTropics wrote:That ridge isn't budging anytime soon...And worse, Texas seems to be getting inundated AGAIN at hour 144 along with something else trying to spin up in the BOC. Crazy!!!



Let's not panic quite yet about Texas getting hit with something else in a week. It is far, far too soon to take any model right now to the grave. I try not to focus on models until 3-4 days out only cause wide variations consolidate into a smaller variations the more time passes. That being said, I 'try' but it is hard not to watch this from beginning to end.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7182
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: RE: Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#228 Postby jlauderdal » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:38 pm

SouthFLTropics wrote:That ridge isn't budging anytime soon...And worse, Texas seems to be getting inundated AGAIN at hour 144 along with something else trying to spin up in the BOC. Crazy!!!
Bastardi likes the western gulf next week
0 likes   

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#229 Postby AutoPenalti » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:39 pm

chaser1 wrote:I beg to differ with you'all. While comparing the 12Z yesterday to today's 12Z, and looking at their respective 12Z Saturday verification times.... here is what I see. Today's run implies that Irma will be stronger than the prior EURO's comparative run. Also, if using the same Sat. 12Z verification time and comparing today's 12Z 96 hr. run to the 12 Z run from yesterday, this newest run places Irma at about 19.2 N and 41.0 W (as compared to the prior EURO 120 hr 12Z run where it would have been centered at 18.5 N & 45.6 W for the same verifying time period of 12Z Sat.). We're talking about a 1/2 degree difference in greater latitude and about 4 =/- degrees longitude. The synoptic set up is no different however and there is no reason that Irma should then suddenly go out to sea?? In fact, this is where the Atlantic High really begins to exert itself and where Irma begins a WSW motion I believe.

Hour 144 is where it's stuck, ridge seems weaker at that timeframe. Let's see what happens.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#230 Postby TheStormExpert » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:39 pm

Moving due west @168hrs. Off topic, look at what is heading for the NW Gulf and Texas again! :eek:

Image

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5464
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#231 Postby chaser1 » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:39 pm

Just realized I was slow in my last post and in fact I was correct...... Irma is NOT racing to the North Pole LOL!! Not to say that downstream troughing near or close to the E. Conus might not veer her east of the Bahamas and the US but that's an altogether another topic for farther down the road.
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#232 Postby TheStormExpert » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:47 pm

12z Euro @192hrs.

Image

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5464
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#233 Postby chaser1 » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:47 pm

Lets see if the 216 hr. 500mb remains consistant with prior run showing 600mb heights building north of Irma with time! New added wrinkle of course is the "latest" GOM invader taking aim at Louisiana.
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#234 Postby sma10 » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:47 pm

More of a WNW heading at 192hr, passing the Leewards to the NE. This is where these suckers usually find their escape hatch, however from the look of that trough digging into the nation's midsection, I don't see a clear escape route yet.
0 likes   

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#235 Postby AutoPenalti » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:48 pm

TheStormExpert wrote:12z Euro @192hrs.

Image

Image

May I ask what the difference is between the MSLP anomaly, 500mb and the 500mb normalized anomaly?
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#236 Postby TheStormExpert » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:51 pm

12z Euro @216hrs.

Image

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5464
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#237 Postby chaser1 » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:52 pm

:uarrow: 500mb is the forecast of the basic steering level, where the 500mb anomoly is the present 500mb forecast as compared to multi-year average 500mb over time. I like to compare the 500mb maps to the 500mb 24 hour change
2 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#238 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:52 pm

AutoPenalti wrote:
TheStormExpert wrote:12z Euro @192hrs.

Image

Image

May I ask what the difference is between the MSLP anomaly, 500mb and the 500mb normalized anomaly?

MSLP anomaly is mainly for seeing what the ocean pressures are, if they are decreasing or increasing, storm intensity, and if they are above or below normal in a certain area.
500mb normalized anomaly is for depicting the strength of ridges and troughs, which can help us determine where a system is going to go due to since those features steer the cyclones.
Last edited by AxaltaRacing24 on Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#239 Postby blp » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:53 pm

Looks like the trough is getting squeezed with the big Bermuda High from the East and the High out to the West. If the trough retrogrades watch out this thing is heading west.
1 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
meriland29
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:05 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#240 Postby meriland29 » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:54 pm

Is there a reason we are already seeing so much activity this year? Is it cause El Nino came and went? Warmer waters? I am just curious on opinions,.
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests