weathaguyry wrote:As we can tell, the GFS has no interest in climatology, reasonable steering currents, or the laws of physics for this run
Nothing violated the laws of physics in that run.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
weathaguyry wrote:As we can tell, the GFS has no interest in climatology, reasonable steering currents, or the laws of physics for this run
ColdMiser123 wrote:weathaguyry wrote:As we can tell, the GFS has no interest in climatology, reasonable steering currents, or the laws of physics for this run
Nothing violated the laws of physics in that run.
CrazyC83 wrote:This setup really screams Isabel to me. That seems to be the storm most similar due to the incoming trough, higher latitude initiation and strong ridge.
meriland29 wrote:In other news, Irma's current look...
She really is getting that swirl..
AxaltaRacing24 wrote:tarheelprogrammer wrote:Any METs have a clue as to why the GFS goes through the ridge in long term?
It is physically impossible lol. The GFS is making its own rules tonight
weathaguyry wrote:Landfall in Maine at 252hrs as a 954mb, whatever you want to call it, large enough to create TS winds south of Long Island
Digital-TC-Chaser wrote:
Canadian model also picks the weakness in the steering before the windward Islands.
Cant just have blindfolds on too all model that are not EC.
Alyono wrote:weathaguyry wrote:Landfall in Maine at 252hrs as a 954mb, whatever you want to call it, large enough to create TS winds south of Long Island
it's a LOT more intense than 954. The pressure rose due to the resolution truncation. It is basically saying a legit cat 3 into Maine with a real pressure around 920mb
AutoPenalti wrote:I just got back from the airport to check on the GFS and I have to say... Just. WOW.
Not only does it go below 900mb, it actually rams through the Ridge up towards a landmass.
Holy cow!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests