ATL: IRMA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Fountainguy97
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 10:35 am
Location: Raleigh, NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1321 Postby Fountainguy97 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 11:58 am

Blown Away wrote:Image

Just a ballpark idea @240 hours... :D


Well basically the Euro represents the southern solution and gfs the northern. Just a day ago we had models spread over 2,000 miles. so an 800 mile increase in concentration isn't too shabby for days 9-10. I wouldn't say the GFS is wonky at all.
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1322 Postby Bocadude85 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 11:59 am

SouthFLTropics wrote:
Bocadude85 wrote:Well if the GFS ends up being correct and Irma misses the Caribbean to the north then that would be a pretty big bust for the Euro in the midrange.


That would be more than a bust by the Euro. It would be a straight up Coup for the GFS. More often than not the Euro is more correct than the GFS. At this time I think the key threat to the CONUS if there is one is Florida to the Carolinas. I think the Euro was too far South on the 00z and the GFS is too far NE on the 12z. You put it in the middle and you end up with Savannah, Georgia give or take a few miles. Floyd has been my analog all along.


If the Euro is correct with the steering patterns then I think another good analog could be Hurricane Donna.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Donna#/media/File%3ADonna_1960_track.png
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1323 Postby gatorcane » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:00 pm

That is a huge shift west by the CMC. The GFS has been way too inconsistent for me. I would not be surprised in the Euro continues to show a similar solution. You have to admit it has been pretty consistent with the track even though 10 days the past couple of days of runs. The Aussie ACCESS model and NASA models are with the Euro.
Last edited by gatorcane on Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1324 Postby WeatherEmperor » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:01 pm

SFLcane wrote:Euro will probably come around next few runs this hurricane isn't gonna close to the SE with that trof there


The 12z Canadian shifted a good 300+ miles further West. Perhaps this is the first clue that future runs will come closer to the Euro?


Sent from my iPhone 7 using Tapatalk
0 likes   

JPmia
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 11:01 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1325 Postby JPmia » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:03 pm

Last edited by JPmia on Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1326 Postby Bocadude85 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:04 pm

gatorcane wrote:That is a huge shift west by the CMC. The GFS has been way too inconsistent for me. I would not be surprised in the Euro continues to show a similar solution. You have to admit it has been pretty consistent with the track even though 10 days the past couple of days of runs. The Aussie ACCESS model and NASA models are with the Euro.


That is a huge shift by the 12z Canadian, now brings Irma into the NE Caribbean islands.
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20012
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1327 Postby tolakram » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:04 pm

I had to delete a bunch of posts. Please remember this is the models thread and keep discussion to models AND avoid comments that do not add to the discussion. Most questions are OK as long as they are pertinent to a model run.

Thanks for your cooperation. Discussion thread is here: http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=119058&p=2618082#p2618082
1 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1328 Postby sma10 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:05 pm

gatorcane wrote:That is a huge shift west by the CMC. The GFS has been way too inconsistent for me. I would not be surprised in the Euro continues to show a similar solution. You have to admit it has been pretty consistent with the track even though 10 days the past couple of days of runs. The Aussie ACCESS model and NASA models are with the Euro.


And to some extent the UK, which unfortunately only goes out 6 days. Would nice to know what the UK thinks from days 6-10 once it's at 19.5 60.5. Does it continue on a WNW heading or immediately jump out towards Bermuda like GFS?
0 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5475
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1329 Postby chaser1 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:06 pm

I'd almost be curious as to what the "old" GFS model would have come out with (okay, I did say "almost :lol: )
1 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10147
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1330 Postby Blown Away » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:06 pm

gatorcane wrote:That is a huge shift west by the CMC. The GFS has been way too inconsistent for me. I would not be surprised in the Euro continues to show a similar solution. You have to admit it has been pretty consistent with the track even though 10 days the past couple of days of runs. The Aussie ACCESS model and NASA models are with the Euro.


Notice the HWRF/HMON models all running about 1 degree S of previous run...
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

HurricaneFrances04
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 597
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 8:09 am
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1331 Postby HurricaneFrances04 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:08 pm

No model is right or wrong 10 days out. Irma is still 5 days a way before it begins to even start impacting any land. There is going to be a week of major model swings, and even within 48 hours they can be off by a hundred miles.
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1332 Postby Bocadude85 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:09 pm

Does anyone have the text output from the 12z UKMET?
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1333 Postby RL3AO » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:11 pm

tarheelprogrammer wrote:Still a long ways out, but the GFS might have the right idea. Troughs have saved the US East Coast a lot recently. ECMWF should come around to this solution eventually in my opinion.


I'd like to see the GFS get the motion of Irma right in 12 hours before I start buying into it getting day 10 right.

Image
10 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1334 Postby Frank2 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:11 pm

Current spaghetti models still showing a recurve - right now Irma is at 17N, far too north for anything but an eventual recurve. My guess the NHC will soon back away from forecasting a southerly motion.

https://www.sfwmd.gov/weather-radar/hur ... odel-plots

P.S. This far out the models will diverge, but the opinion has always been the farther north the cyclone is at the point of initial formation the more prone it is to the coriolis effect, especially if it intensifies rapidly.

Frank
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1335 Postby RL3AO » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:14 pm

Frank2 wrote:Current spaghetti models still showing a recurve - right now Irma is at 17N, far too north for anything but an eventual recurve. My guess the NHC will soon back away from forecasting a southerly motion.


Frank, except the only things on that spaghetti plot that matters, is the UKMET, TVCN, TVCX, NHC, HWRF, and GFS. The first of five of those six show a major threat.
5 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1336 Postby txwatcher91 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:14 pm

Frank2 wrote:Current spaghetti models still showing a recurve - right now Irma is at 17N, far too north for anything but an eventual recurve. My guess the NHC will soon back away from forecasting a southerly motion.

https://www.sfwmd.gov/weather-radar/hur ... odel-plots

P.S. This far out the models will diverge, but the opinion has always been the farther north the cyclone is at the point of initial formation the more prone it is to the coriolis effect, especially if it intensifies rapidly.

Frank


I'd have to respectfully disagree. Those plots don't show the Euro and it's ensembles, the two most important and best performing ones IMO. The strong ridge may very well push this through the Herbert Box and if that occurs the chance for a FL to NC impact go way up.
1 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1337 Postby WeatherEmperor » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:15 pm

Frank2 wrote:Current spaghetti models still showing a recurve - right now Irma is at 17N, far too north for anything but an eventual recurve. My guess the NHC will soon back away from forecasting a southerly motion.

https://www.sfwmd.gov/weather-radar/hur ... odel-plots

P.S. This far out the models will diverge, but the opinion has always been the farther north the cyclone is at the point of initial formation the more prone it is to the coriolis effect, especially if it intensifies rapidly.

Frank



 https://twitter.com/TropicalTidbits/status/903278178768183296





Sent from my iPhone 7 using Tapatalk
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20012
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1338 Postby tolakram » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:16 pm

Frank2 wrote:Current spaghetti models still showing a recurve - right now Irma is at 17N, far too north for anything but an eventual recurve. My guess the NHC will soon back away from forecasting a southerly motion.

https://www.sfwmd.gov/weather-radar/hur ... odel-plots

P.S. This far out the models will diverge, but the opinion has always been the farther north the cyclone is at the point of initial formation the more prone it is to the coriolis effect, especially if it intensifies rapidly.

Frank


Frank, I know you and I both don't want a US hit but right now all reliable models are showing the southerly dip. The problem with just looking at the spaghetti plots is they give equal weight to the good and bad models. Just promise us you are prepared for the worst and keep your eye on this thing. Ike was suppose to recurve as well and missed Florida to the south ... still too early.
1 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10147
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1339 Postby Blown Away » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:17 pm

The 11am NHC has Irma at 16N/55.5 west in 120 hours... The 12z GFS has Irma at 17N/52.5W in 120 hours... That means the 12z GFS is @180 miles ENE/slower than the NHC 120 hour position...
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7183
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1340 Postby jlauderdal » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:17 pm

Frank2 wrote:Current spaghetti models still showing a recurve - right now Irma is at 17N, far too north for anything but an eventual recurve. My guess the NHC will soon back away from forecasting a southerly motion.

https://www.sfwmd.gov/weather-radar/hur ... odel-plots

P.S. This far out the models will diverge, but the opinion has always been the farther north the cyclone is at the point of initial formation the more prone it is to the coriolis effect, especially if it intensifies rapidly.

Frank
frank, nhc is forecasting a sw dip to a full degree south to 16 and 22 degrees west of its current location..would you say recurve if we were at 16n 55 w today heading 280
1 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests