SFLcane wrote:Upper low is gone on the GFS..
Could you fill me in on what that means for the track
Moderator: S2k Moderators
SFLcane wrote:Upper low is gone on the GFS..
jlauderdal wrote:Gfs was actually better with Matthew than euro, maybe not a coup...when gfs can get the first 24h of Irma correct I will give it more weightGeneratorPower wrote:CourierPR wrote:In a recent tweet, Met. Joe Bastardi noted he is staying with the Euro. He also said that the GFS might score a coup but he doubts it.
Can you remember the last time the GFS scored a meaningful "coup"? I didn't think so. Neither can I.
Sent from my DL8006 using Tapatalk
SouthFLTropics wrote:Further north at 108
[url=https://postimages.org/https://s26.postimg.org/60bmrkvsp/gfs_z500a_Norm_atl_19.png[/url]
WAcyclone wrote:ECMWF control run:
Source: weather.us
KWT wrote:sma10 wrote:The biggest difference appears to be forward motion. The GFS is consistently slower than Euro. You can see this happening again on the 18Z starting in the 48-72 hr period. I guess thats something to watch this weekend.
Yes that is interesting to see and its borne out in the ensemble as well, suggests the ECM has a stronger ridge and thus airflow round the southern side of the ridge. I suspect given what we have observed over the last 24hrs the idea of the stronger ridge seems more realistic.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests