ATL: IRMA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2381 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:36 pm

Stronger and more N
Image
0 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2382 Postby stormreader » Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:40 pm

We can begin (only just begin) to draw a few generalizations. No specifics... I think the chances of out to sea, without US impact, have dropped quite a bit. The deep trough is starting to look like a very transitional type feature---no lasting power. This could change, but both major models have shifted closer to the continental US, and the very steepness of the trough will actually encourage Irma (through the consequent strong Atlantic ridging to the east) to make an approach to the US coast (probably S Fl). Now what are the percentages that this steep early season trough remains in place for at least long enough to pull Irma north and out to sea.... Doubt it. The steepness and the time of year seem to argue for the trough being sort of gobbled back up by the ridge to the north of Irma. There could very well be enough of a temporary weakness to pull Irma up toward the Carolinas, definitely possible... but north of that, or out to sea, I think much less likely now. Now its also becoming a distinct possibility that the trough dissolves even quicker than anticipated, and Irma is pulled directly toward S Fl...or even more west than expected with renewed ridging, and carried along through the Fl Straits. Might sound unlikely now, but I wouldn't bet against it. Main thing is that out to sea is looking less likely IMO.
3 likes   

User avatar
meriland29
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:05 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2383 Postby meriland29 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:42 pm

Out of curiosity, and it may seem like a silly question but, when it comes to GFS, is there ever typically a rogue time (00z, 06z, etc) that is usually more correct than others, or vise versa?
0 likes   

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2384 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:43 pm

meriland29 wrote:Out of curiosity, and it may seem like a silly question but, when it comes to GFS, is there ever typically a rogue time (00z, 06z, etc) that is usually more correct than others, or vise versa?

The 18/00z runs are happy hour and late night party runs :lol: The 12z always seems tame though.
Last edited by AxaltaRacing24 on Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2385 Postby RL3AO » Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:43 pm

meriland29 wrote:Out of curiosity, and it may seem like a silly question but, when it comes to GFS, is there ever typically a rogue time (00z, 06z, etc) that is usually more correct than others, or vise versa?


I don't have the stats, but the 18z runs have seemed off compared to other times.
1 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2386 Postby RL3AO » Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:44 pm

Maybe 25 miles north of the 12z run. Same speed.

Image
1 likes   

Steve H.
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2147
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 9:06 am
Location: Palm Bay, Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2387 Postby Steve H. » Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:45 pm

I used to hear that 06z and 18z were the "off" times for the models, but that may be only when they are getting recon data from a storm. It could just be an urban myth though.
0 likes   

User avatar
meriland29
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:05 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2388 Postby meriland29 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:45 pm

RL3AO wrote:Maybe 25 miles north of the 12z run. Same speed.




That is so weird. Definite windshield wiper effect, this one is N of 12z, and 12z was S of 06z..
0 likes   

User avatar
weathaguyry
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1272
Age: 22
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 5:16 am
Location: Long Island, NY

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2389 Postby weathaguyry » Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:46 pm

AxaltaRacing24 wrote:
meriland29 wrote:Out of curiosity, and it may seem like a silly question but, when it comes to GFS, is there ever typically a rogue time (00z, 06z, etc) that is usually more correct than others, or vise versa?

The 18/00z runs are happy hour and late night party runs :lol: The 12z always seems tame though.


If a hurricane into Rhode Island came from the "tame" 12z, then what will it show on the 18z happy hour run!? :lol:
0 likes   
My posts are only my opinions and NOT official forecasts. For official forecasts, consult the National Hurricane Center or the National Weather Service.

Irene 11', Sandy 12', Fay 20’, Isaias 20’, Elsa 21’, Henri 21’, Ida 21’

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2390 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:47 pm

Shifted south compared to earlier which puts it on top of the 18z
Image
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2391 Postby RL3AO » Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:48 pm

Steve H. wrote:I used to hear that 06z and 18z were the "off" times for the models, but that may be only when they are getting recon data from a storm. It could just be an urban myth though.


That probably goes back to the days when the models relied more on the weather balloons at 0 and 12z. Now, >99% of the data that goes into models comes from satellites, airplanes, and other non-balloon sources.
1 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2392 Postby RL3AO » Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:48 pm

Moving due west at 16N. Still a little bit north of 12z, but otherwise the same.

Image
0 likes   

BYG Jacob

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2393 Postby BYG Jacob » Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:50 pm

weathaguyry wrote:
AxaltaRacing24 wrote:
meriland29 wrote:Out of curiosity, and it may seem like a silly question but, when it comes to GFS, is there ever typically a rogue time (00z, 06z, etc) that is usually more correct than others, or vise versa?

The 18/00z runs are happy hour and late night party runs :lol: The 12z always seems tame though.


If a hurricane into Rhode Island came from the "tame" 12z, then what will it show on the 18z happy hour run!? :lol:

Category 5 into Canada coming right up!
0 likes   

User avatar
meriland29
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:05 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2394 Postby meriland29 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:50 pm

Looking at the 12z vs 18z for the same timeframe, looks almost identical. Just a hair (I do mean a hair) N of 12z, and a tad slower.
1 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10155
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2395 Postby Blown Away » Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:51 pm

18z GFS... @78 hrs gets down to @16.1N, the NHC's lowest point is 16.4N...
1 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05… Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

Steve H.
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2147
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 9:06 am
Location: Palm Bay, Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2396 Postby Steve H. » Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:51 pm

RL3AO wrote:
Steve H. wrote:I used to hear that 06z and 18z were the "off" times for the models, but that may be only when they are getting recon data from a storm. It could just be an urban myth though.


That probably goes back to the days when the models relied more on the weather balloons at 0 and 12z. Now, >99% of the data that goes into models comes from satellites, airplanes, and other non-balloon sources.


So true. Thanks for pointing that out!-
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2397 Postby ConvergenceZone » Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:53 pm

We will see if we get another Upper East Coast landfall on this run
0 likes   

User avatar
meriland29
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:05 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2398 Postby meriland29 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:54 pm

hr84-90, W to NW turn
0 likes   

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2399 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:55 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10155
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#2400 Postby Blown Away » Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:56 pm

18z GFS... 96 hours... @17N/55.1W... NHC 96 hour position is 17N/56.5W
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05… Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests