tolakram wrote:I'll just leave this here.
THERE HE IS!!! Us old timers from the beginning remember seeing that one!!!
Moderator: S2k Moderators
tolakram wrote:I'll just leave this here.
AxaltaRacing24 wrote:tiger_deF wrote:Irma appears much worse on satellite. Does anyone know why this is? Is there an EWRC going on, or is the cold water just getting to Irma and weakening her core? The convection is plenty cold but the eye appears nonexistant.
The dry/stable EPAC like air around it and the cool waters. Similar to the area where EPAC storms spin-down. However, once this gets into moist warm waters, it is off to the races.
Kingarabian wrote:AxaltaRacing24 wrote:tiger_deF wrote:Irma appears much worse on satellite. Does anyone know why this is? Is there an EWRC going on, or is the cold water just getting to Irma and weakening her core? The convection is plenty cold but the eye appears nonexistant.
The dry/stable EPAC like air around it and the cool waters. Similar to the area where EPAC storms spin-down. However, once this gets into moist warm waters, it is off to the races.
Spot on. Also interested in to knowing why the NHC went with 105kts when the storms presentation had degraded. I know the satellite estimates supported it, but in the Epac, the NHC would override the estimates and go lower in similar cases.
Kingarabian wrote:AxaltaRacing24 wrote:tiger_deF wrote:Irma appears much worse on satellite. Does anyone know why this is? Is there an EWRC going on, or is the cold water just getting to Irma and weakening her core? The convection is plenty cold but the eye appears nonexistant.
The dry/stable EPAC like air around it and the cool waters. Similar to the area where EPAC storms spin-down. However, once this gets into moist warm waters, it is off to the races.
Spot on. Also interested in to knowing why the NHC went with 105kts when the storms presentation had degraded. I know the satellite estimates supported it, but in the Epac, the NHC would override the estimates and go lower in similar cases.
christchurchguy wrote:Since the water is cooler and the shear is light, could Irma be becoming annular,
The new eye looks quite a bit larger relative to the CDO.
Its moving west or WSW under a ridge.
Similar to Edouard 1996 or Luis 1995 in a similar area
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Luis
[url]rammb.cira.colostate.edu/resources/docs/annular_Knaff.pdf[/url]
NJWxHurricane wrote:https://twitter.com/wxbrad/status/903812435768958976
AutoPenalti wrote:NJWxHurricane wrote:https://twitter.com/wxbrad/status/903812435768958976
Interesting, any implications for long term?
NJWxHurricane wrote:https://twitter.com/wxbrad/status/903812435768958976
AutoPenalti wrote:NJWxHurricane wrote:https://twitter.com/wxbrad/status/903812435768958976
Interesting, any implications for long term?
tolakram wrote:I'll just leave this here.
Blown Away wrote:Irma has moved faster than predicted to the W if you look at the forecasts from earlier today, like 5am, Irma is a full degree farther W and @20 miles N...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest