ATL: IRMA - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1361 Postby Aric Dunn » Fri Sep 01, 2017 10:56 pm

RL3AO wrote:
eastcoastFL wrote:I totally agree. Models are all over the place and continue to change each run. We need to deal with the current situations in place right now and how they are affecting the storm and it's path.


I'm calling BS on this. Here's the last four Euro runs verifying 7 days from now.

Here are the last ELEVEN runs of the GFS verifying 7 days from now.

That's remarkable consistency from the models for a 7 to 11 day forecast.

If you're mad because the GFS shifts it's 12 to 16 day forecast, then you should stop looking at models for about 30 more years.



Come on now. You know it is like every other system .. a flag flapping in the wind.. you picked out the euro.. right ? Even though the spread is over a 1000 miles in its memebers. Yes we can all see the back and forth trends.

I mean really.. the euro which had a cut off low vs a open trough some how still managed to be farther west then the gfs ?


The models have only agreed upon a general track for the next barely.. and i mean brealy 3 days.. not even including intensity..

We all see .. as always. A series of short term forecast is prudent.
4 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1362 Postby RL3AO » Fri Sep 01, 2017 10:59 pm

Aric Dunn wrote: I mean really.. the euro which had a cut off low vs a open trough some how still managed to be farther west then the gfs ?


At what time frame? The cut off low vs open trough is impacting the system in 8 or 9 days. Of course the models have huge differences.
2 likes   

HurricaneRyan
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 813
Age: 31
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:05 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1363 Postby HurricaneRyan » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:05 pm

I feel like a part of me thinks this MIGHT go out to see and pull a Swish Swish, but then the other part of me thinks this will pull an Isabel and have a "Look What You Made Me Do" moment with the eastern seaboard.
2 likes   
Kay '22 Hilary '23

djones65
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 264
Age: 59
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:05 am
Location: Ocean Springs, MS

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1364 Postby djones65 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:07 pm

Aric? I disagree with you completely! Rl3ao made an excellent post demonstrating the consistency of the global models in the near term and even mid range. You are wrong to describe them as a "flag flapping in the wind."
I normally agree with many of your posts but in this instance I agree with rl3ao that the models are performing well at th moment. Ten days is a very long time and obviously will see some variability. But two to five days can be relied on relatively well within 150 miles in my opinion.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1365 Postby RL3AO » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:10 pm

If you never looked at any model run beyond day 10 with Irma, I think you'd be presently surprised at the relative consistency in track. All of the major differences were happening in the day 9 to 16 range. Now the potential US threat is getting within 10 days and the models are starting to get a lot closer together with a big signal in/near the Bahamas.
1 likes   

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1366 Postby floridasun78 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:12 pm

one thing the nhc tell us don't nut models after 5 days that why nhc don't do 10 days forecast models are good for 5 days after that is like bad dream
0 likes   

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1367 Postby Blinhart » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:12 pm

RL3AO wrote:If you never looked at any model run beyond day 10 with Irma, I think you'd be presently surprised at the relative consistency in track. All of the major differences were happening in the day 9 to 16 range. Now the potential US threat is getting within 10 days and the models are starting to get a lot closer together with a big signal in/near the Bahamas.



Yeah, I think the question now will be will she be pushed West into the Gulf or NW into the Carolina's, don't you agree???
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1368 Postby Blinhart » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:14 pm

floridasun78 wrote:one thing the nhc tell us don't nut models after 5 days that why nhc don't do 10 days forecast models are good for 5 days after that is like bad dream


Normally that is true, but the consistency with the models for Irma have been pretty good, there hasn't been that many showing any Out to Sea or any going into the Yucatan Peninsula, so the spread isn't as big as they normally would be for a system this far out.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1369 Postby floridasun78 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:15 pm

i remember seen models showing cat 4 coming toward news were saying wow and when ten days got close didn't show cat 4 moving toward miami want more up and want out to sea
0 likes   

pcolaman
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 380
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 9:33 am
Location: Pensacola Fla

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1370 Postby pcolaman » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:15 pm

All I really notice is the trend further west .
0 likes   

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1371 Postby floridasun78 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:18 pm

Blinhart wrote:
floridasun78 wrote:one thing the nhc tell us don't nut models after 5 days that why nhc don't do 10 days forecast models are good for 5 days after that is like bad dream


Normally that is true, but the consistency with the models for Irma have been pretty good, there hasn't been that many showing any Out to Sea or any going into the Yucatan Peninsula, so the spread isn't as big as they normally would be for a system this far out.

models are coming better and before but 10 days models run still have error but i see few year were nhc could go close 10 day forecast
0 likes   

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1372 Postby Blinhart » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:21 pm

floridasun78 wrote:i remember seen models showing cat 4 coming toward news were saying wow and when ten days got close didn't show cat 4 moving toward miami want more up and want out to sea


That is why most newscast don't try to do that anymore they don't want to have "The Cry Wolf Syndrome" happen. So they are very careful to not say it is coming their way until no more than 36 hours before landfall, and then there is so much things that happen in the rush evacuations. Imagine trying to evacuate all of Miami-Dade and the surrounding area in 36 hours, that is why it is a good thing to let people know of the chances of a storm coming but not say for sure it is coming there, if people want to leave they have the option to leave. Hope that makes since, lost concentration.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1373 Postby floridasun78 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:23 pm

Blinhart wrote:
floridasun78 wrote:i remember seen models showing cat 4 coming toward news were saying wow and when ten days got close didn't show cat 4 moving toward miami want more up and want out to sea


That is why most newscast don't try to do that anymore they don't want to have "The Cry Wolf Syndrome" happen. So they are very careful to not say it is coming their way until no more than 36 hours before landfall, and then there is so much things that happen in the rush evacuations. Imagine trying to evacuate all of Miami-Dade and the surrounding area in 36 hours, that is why it is a good thing to let people know of the chances of a storm coming but not say for sure it is coming there, if people want to leave they have the option to leave. Hope that makes since, lost concentration.

i know key west it take three days because their do by section
0 likes   

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1374 Postby floridasun78 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:27 pm

other i have say i going go store get stuff i need because people see cone by wed and see it still moving wnw city going go nut i saw happen few time here with other hurr good night all i say enjoy long weekend check here few time day let see what tue models show
0 likes   

User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3901
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Recon Discussion Thread

#1375 Postby eastcoastFL » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:27 pm

896
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: IRMA - Recon Discussion Thread

#1376 Postby Blinhart » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:29 pm

floridasun78 wrote:this hurr could beat Harvey lowest pressure


no doubt about that, she should definitely get below 940 unless somehow she blows up.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
got ants?
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 114
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 3:44 am
Location: Hollywood/Ft Laud

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1377 Postby got ants? » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:44 pm

Took me a few weeks to remember my login name/password, but here I am..

I'm in Hollywood FL. Been through too many storms. Usually I have an old cracker complacency, but this one has a bad taste in my mouth. I hate that because most times its dead on. Anyhoos, I'll be here for the ride...
6 likes   
This post is NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECAST and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Chris90
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 646
Age: 35
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2017 9:36 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Recon Discussion Thread

#1378 Postby Chris90 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:50 pm

I'll guess 916mb.
Highest flight level winds of 156kts
Highest sfmr winds of 138 kts.
0 likes   
Solar Aquarian
Lunar Cancerian
:uarrow: Sagittarian

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1379 Postby Hurricaneman » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:51 pm

Looks like another ewrc might be happening, could have something to do with dry air intrusion and lower ocean temps which will change the next 18 to 24 hrs after that it's off to the races
0 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1380 Postby txwatcher91 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:52 pm

Irma is looking pretty rough right now. I wonder if another EWRC is starting like the NHC hinted about? Anyone have any ideas? It could be the drier and more stable air it has moved into combined with the marginal SST’s as well.
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests