ATL: IRMA - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Macrocane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4218
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 5:35 pm
Location: El Salvador

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1521 Postby Macrocane » Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:29 pm

Where is the shear supossedly going to come from? Looking at the models it seems like the upper anticyclone is going to stay well defined and move along with Irma, I see an upper low northwest of Irma by day 5 but doesn't seem to be close enough to cause much shear.

Not a pro or official forecast.
2 likes   

User avatar
Evenstar
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:11 pm
Location: Chesapeake, Virginia

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1522 Postby Evenstar » Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:31 pm

tiger_deF wrote:How about instead of discussing models on the hurricane page, how about we actually look at the current status of the hurricane, like its intensity, look, dvorak signature, and other features? The last talk about the actual hurricane is 2 pages back, and meaningless speculation is rampant.


I am baffled by what you just said. If we don't discuss the models, what's the point of being here at all? And if we aren't talking about Irma, which storm are we talking about on the Irma discussion page? This forum is doing what it is supposed to do: Speculate and discuss the possibilities, both meaningless and otherwise.
9 likes   
I never received my Hogwarts letter, so I'm leaving the Shire and becoming a Sith Lord.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1523 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:36 pm

BeRad954 wrote:What would happen if the SW bend was deeper? Would that shift the guidance more west and south as well?


Yes, that is why we must wait and not speculte passed 3 days right now until the turn to the wnw starts until then we only have a general idea of what the pattern might do.. so we wait a speculate.. try to do our best with educated guesses and analyses
5 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
Evenstar
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:11 pm
Location: Chesapeake, Virginia

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1524 Postby Evenstar » Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:41 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
BeRad954 wrote:What would happen if the SW bend was deeper? Would that shift the guidance more west and south as well?


Yes, that is why we must wait and not speculte passed 3 days right now until the turn to the wnw starts until then we only have a general idea of what the pattern might do.. so we wait a speculate.. try to do our best with educated guesses and analyses


Educated guesses based on analysis IS speculating. I don't understand what the point is of having a discussion page if we shouldn't be discussing a system before it's three days out.
0 likes   
I never received my Hogwarts letter, so I'm leaving the Shire and becoming a Sith Lord.

hohnywx
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 508
Age: 34
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:34 pm
Location: Hastings-on-Hudson, NY

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1525 Postby hohnywx » Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:42 pm

Evenstar wrote:
tiger_deF wrote:How about instead of discussing models on the hurricane page, how about we actually look at the current status of the hurricane, like its intensity, look, dvorak signature, and other features? The last talk about the actual hurricane is 2 pages back, and meaningless speculation is rampant.


I am baffled by what you just said. If we don't discuss the models, what's the point of being here at all? And if we aren't talking about Irma, which storm are we talking about on the Irma discussion page? This forum is doing what it is supposed to do: Speculate and discuss the possibilities, both meaningless and otherwise.


I think his point was to just discuss the models in the models thread and have actual storm discussion in this thread. No reason to have a model thread if the talk is going to go on in here too.
2 likes   

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1526 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:42 pm

Evenstar wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
BeRad954 wrote:What would happen if the SW bend was deeper? Would that shift the guidance more west and south as well?


Yes, that is why we must wait and not speculte passed 3 days right now until the turn to the wnw starts until then we only have a general idea of what the pattern might do.. so we wait a speculate.. try to do our best with educated guesses and analyses


Educated guesses based on analysis IS speculating. I don't understand what the point is of having a discussion page if we shouldn't be discussing a system before it's three days out.

He's mainly talking about the people who are ruling landfall areas out and sounding all clears.
3 likes   

User avatar
Evenstar
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:11 pm
Location: Chesapeake, Virginia

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1527 Postby Evenstar » Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:47 pm

hohnywx wrote:
Evenstar wrote:
tiger_deF wrote:How about instead of discussing models on the hurricane page, how about we actually look at the current status of the hurricane, like its intensity, look, dvorak signature, and other features? The last talk about the actual hurricane is 2 pages back, and meaningless speculation is rampant.


I am baffled by what you just said. If we don't discuss the models, what's the point of being here at all? And if we aren't talking about Irma, which storm are we talking about on the Irma discussion page? This forum is doing what it is supposed to do: Speculate and discuss the possibilities, both meaningless and otherwise.


I think his point was to just discuss the models in the models thread and have actual storm discussion in this thread. No reason to have a model thread if the talk is going to go on in here too.


It would be bizarre if we didn't reference models in the discussion. To quote Flash Gordon, we would be "flying blind on a rocket cycle" and this forum would indeed be meaningless.
2 likes   
I never received my Hogwarts letter, so I'm leaving the Shire and becoming a Sith Lord.

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1528 Postby Blinhart » Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:48 pm

hohnywx wrote:
Evenstar wrote:
tiger_deF wrote:How about instead of discussing models on the hurricane page, how about we actually look at the current status of the hurricane, like its intensity, look, dvorak signature, and other features? The last talk about the actual hurricane is 2 pages back, and meaningless speculation is rampant.


I am baffled by what you just said. If we don't discuss the models, what's the point of being here at all? And if we aren't talking about Irma, which storm are we talking about on the Irma discussion page? This forum is doing what it is supposed to do: Speculate and discuss the possibilities, both meaningless and otherwise.


I think his point was to just discuss the models in the models thread and have actual storm discussion in this thread. No reason to have a model thread if the talk is going to go on in here too.


That is not how it used to be, the Model thread used to be for just posting models, with the discussion in this thread or a separate thread.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
BeRad954
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 17
Age: 36
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 11:19 am
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1529 Postby BeRad954 » Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:50 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
BeRad954 wrote:What would happen if the SW bend was deeper? Would that shift the guidance more west and south as well?


Yes, that is why we must wait and not speculte passed 3 days right now until the turn to the wnw starts until then we only have a general idea of what the pattern might do.. so we wait a speculate.. try to do our best with educated guesses and analyses


Thanks for the response Aric, just trying to keep up with all the possibilities and scenarios. I understand everything in weather is uncertain until it happens :wink:
2 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. Please refer to the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1530 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:52 pm

Evenstar wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
BeRad954 wrote:What would happen if the SW bend was deeper? Would that shift the guidance more west and south as well?


Yes, that is why we must wait and not speculte passed 3 days right now until the turn to the wnw starts until then we only have a general idea of what the pattern might do.. so we wait a speculate.. try to do our best with educated guesses and analyses


Educated guesses based on analysis IS speculating. I don't understand what the point is of having a discussion page if we shouldn't be discussing a system before it's three days out.


im not sure what your getting at. Who said not to discuss anything passed 3 days? There is a difference between looking at models and "discussing" what the model is doing vs. " I think its going be a cat 5 into NC".

right now the models do not have a handle on the down stream mechanism, so the point of discussing them is brought down to speculating since the big player in this game right now is how far sw does it get before the turn.. going farther WSW to sw would slow its arrival down to the western atlantic and affect the timing of the trough interaction. same applies to it being faster by not dipping as far south and turning sooner.

so the crux is this turn...once it turns... then we will a have much better idea of timing.
Last edited by Aric Dunn on Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

WeatherGuesser
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2672
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 6:46 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1531 Postby WeatherGuesser » Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:53 pm

TheStormExpert wrote:
NDG wrote:
TheStormExpert wrote:So you don't think Florida is out of the woods just yet?


Nope.

Any idea on when we might know?


Next week.
1 likes   

User avatar
Evenstar
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:11 pm
Location: Chesapeake, Virginia

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1532 Postby Evenstar » Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:59 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
Evenstar wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
Yes, that is why we must wait and not speculte passed 3 days right now until the turn to the wnw starts until then we only have a general idea of what the pattern might do.. so we wait a speculate.. try to do our best with educated guesses and analyses


Educated guesses based on analysis IS speculating. I don't understand what the point is of having a discussion page if we shouldn't be discussing a system before it's three days out.


im not sure what your getting at. Who said not to discuss anything passed 3 days? There is a difference between looking at models and "discussing" what the model is doing vs. " I think its going be a cat 5 into NC".

right now the models do not have a handle on the down stream mechanism so the point of discussing them is brought down to speculating since the big player in this game right now is how far sw does it before the turn.. going farther WSW to sw would slow its arrival down to the western atlantic and affect the timing of the trough interaction. same applies to it being faster by not dipping as far south and turning sooner.

so the crux is this turn...once it turns... then we will a have much better idea of timing.


I understand why you are saying we have to wait to know what it's actually going to do, but if we are not going to discuss the possibilities from the time a storm leaves the coast of Africa to its ultimate destination, then why are we here? And frankly, it's annoying when someone other than a moderator tells people what they should and should not be discussing on the discussion page. (and I'm not referring to you, Aric)
1 likes   
I never received my Hogwarts letter, so I'm leaving the Shire and becoming a Sith Lord.

User avatar
AdamFirst
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2491
Age: 36
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:54 am
Location: Port Saint Lucie, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1533 Postby AdamFirst » Sat Sep 02, 2017 1:01 pm

Has the storm begun its west-southwest trajectory or are we still waiting on that?
0 likes   
Dolphins Marlins Canes Golden Panthers HEAT
Andrew 1992 - Irene 1999 - Frances 2004 - Jeanne 2004 - Wilma 2005 - Fay 2008 - Isaac 2012 - Matthew 2016 - Irma 2017 - Dorian 2019 - Ian 2022 - Nicole 2022 - Milton 2024

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1534 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Sep 02, 2017 1:04 pm

Evenstar wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
Evenstar wrote:
Educated guesses based on analysis IS speculating. I don't understand what the point is of having a discussion page if we shouldn't be discussing a system before it's three days out.


im not sure what your getting at. Who said not to discuss anything passed 3 days? There is a difference between looking at models and "discussing" what the model is doing vs. " I think its going be a cat 5 into NC".

right now the models do not have a handle on the down stream mechanism so the point of discussing them is brought down to speculating since the big player in this game right now is how far sw does it before the turn.. going farther WSW to sw would slow its arrival down to the western atlantic and affect the timing of the trough interaction. same applies to it being faster by not dipping as far south and turning sooner.

so the crux is this turn...once it turns... then we will a have much better idea of timing.


I understand why you are saying we have to wait to know what it's actually going to do, but if we are not going to discuss the possibilities from the time a storm leaves the coast of Africa to its ultimate destination, then why are we here? And frankly, it's annoying when someone other than a moderator tells people what they should and should not be discussing on the discussion page. (and I'm not referring to you, Aric)


At least for this particular hurricane. right now the Carribean islands are in the cross hairs. so the next 3 days are important for this and what I just mentioned. the models wont really have a handle until after it turns...

so go have as many discussions about the Carribean islands impact and the track for the next 3 days.. anything passed that is speculative and of course nothing wrong with speculating passed 3 days.. but right now the important thing is the carribean islands... so thats the difference.
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
Ntxw
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 22787
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1535 Postby Ntxw » Sat Sep 02, 2017 1:05 pm

Lets get back to productive discussion about the storm, and possibilities. Model posts here are fine, just add some commentary on your thoughts relating to it with some support (if necessary) for your ideas/forecast. In general, the discussions thread we are pretty liberal on with posts as long as on topic and relating to the system rather than other posters.

Continue..
8 likes   
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.

  Help support Storm2K!
Help Support Storm2K

User avatar
Evenstar
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:11 pm
Location: Chesapeake, Virginia

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1536 Postby Evenstar » Sat Sep 02, 2017 1:07 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
Evenstar wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
im not sure what your getting at. Who said not to discuss anything passed 3 days? There is a difference between looking at models and "discussing" what the model is doing vs. " I think its going be a cat 5 into NC".

right now the models do not have a handle on the down stream mechanism so the point of discussing them is brought down to speculating since the big player in this game right now is how far sw does it before the turn.. going farther WSW to sw would slow its arrival down to the western atlantic and affect the timing of the trough interaction. same applies to it being faster by not dipping as far south and turning sooner.

so the crux is this turn...once it turns... then we will a have much better idea of timing.


I understand why you are saying we have to wait to know what it's actually going to do, but if we are not going to discuss the possibilities from the time a storm leaves the coast of Africa to its ultimate destination, then why are we here? And frankly, it's annoying when someone other than a moderator tells people what they should and should not be discussing on the discussion page. (and I'm not referring to you, Aric)


At least for this particular hurricane. right now the Carribean islands are in the cross hairs. so the next 3 days are important for this and what I just mentioned. the models wont really have a handle until after it turns...

so go have as many discussions about the Carribean islands impact and the track for the next 3 days.. anything passed that is speculative and of course nothing wrong with speculating passed 3 days.. but right now the important thing is the carribean islands... so thats the difference.


Sigh. I give up.

Meanwhile, in the Atlantic...
1 likes   
I never received my Hogwarts letter, so I'm leaving the Shire and becoming a Sith Lord.

User avatar
Ntxw
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 22787
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1537 Postby Ntxw » Sat Sep 02, 2017 1:11 pm

Moving into warmer SST's now. Has sufficiently warm waters most of the way here on out.

Image
2 likes   
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.



  Help support Storm2K!

Help Support Storm2K


User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3901
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1538 Postby eastcoastFL » Sat Sep 02, 2017 1:32 pm

AdamFirst wrote:Has the storm begun its west-southwest trajectory or are we still waiting on that?



Looks like it's just started it's SW bend a few hours ago.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1539 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Sep 02, 2017 1:36 pm

Its def moving south of west but not too much right now.. should take a more WSW turn soon.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
birddogsc
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2015 2:09 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1540 Postby birddogsc » Sat Sep 02, 2017 1:37 pm

eastcoastFL wrote:Looks like it's just started it's SW bend a few hours ago.


I hope this movement bottoms out soon as this could have serious implication for the islands.

In terms of the future track, I hope we get some clarity on a zone of impact unlike storms like Floyd which have caused large areas of the southern US coast to act and generally caused confusion.
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest