ATL: IRMA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3241 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:29 pm

Alyono wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
tgenius wrote:
Alyono,

As someone who lived through Andrew. Is there a legitimate possibility of Irma doing the same as Andrew and realistically barreling into SFL?


Im not him.. but the answer is a definite yes !


just no Aric.


i made a edit lol.. I meant it as only a possible track into to florida. :)
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

caneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1447
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 5:44 am
Location: Clearwater Beach, Fl

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3242 Postby caneman » Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:30 pm

Raebie wrote:
Alyono wrote:all models shifted westward with regards to the USA EXCEPT for the EC

Not liking seeing these massive flips from it

That said, the threat to the Leeward Islands is most certainly INCREASING. All models have shifted closer to the Leewards


Yep. 12 short hours ago it took out the Carolinas. One run right now means exactly nothing.


2 or 3 days ago, The Euro had it going thru the Keys.That is why we use a blend. It could still flip back west with the other models. So, everyone take a deep breath. Wait to we're at 120 hours
0 likes   

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4041
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3243 Postby AutoPenalti » Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:32 pm

Alyono wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
tgenius wrote:
Alyono,

As someone who lived through Andrew. Is there a legitimate possibility of Irma doing the same as Andrew and realistically barreling into SFL?


Im not him.. but the answer is a definite yes !


just no Aric.

Why not Alyono? So far we've seen during the short term forecasts that it's a bit slower and further WSW, anything after 5 days is a toss-up. I feel that everyone along the eastern seaboard from SE FL to Maine are at equal chances of some sort of effect.
2 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3244 Postby Ken711 » Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:33 pm

1 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3245 Postby stormreader » Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:35 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:Finally! An out to sea run.. Figured this was coming. It was just a matter of time

An out to sea run does not mean an out to sea storm. We're still in the 10 day range here. It looks pretty certain that Irma will be very close to Florida. That's about it when it comes to confidence. In that case, I think the odds are weighted in favor of a U.S. Landfall. Going to keep my own personal "Irma window" open for Cape Fear North Carolina--to--North Cuban Coast. Still think there is a reasonable chance that Irma misses trough altogether. Thus keeping that southerly track as an option.
0 likes   

forecasterjack
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 195
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 3:44 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3246 Postby forecasterjack » Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:39 pm

12Z ECMWF showed a solution precariously close to disaster. With a cutoff ULL in the Mid Atlantic and a high trying to build over Atlantic Canada (But being squished by Greenland ULL), you're crazy close to a bad situation. If that DC ULL is any stronger, that Atlantic ridge any stronger, that Greenland ULL any weaker, you get the left hook displayed by some of the GFS runs. WAY too early to hone in on specific solutions, but latest synoptic trends are concerning to say the least.
Image
2 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3247 Postby Alyono » Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:39 pm

GFS is too fast for a recurve. Trough draws it into the coast. EC sped up slightly, to a speed just right to allow for a recurve. Any faster, and it hits the coast. Any slower, Irma misses the trough. Chances may not be good that it can repeat this next time
4 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3248 Postby stormreader » Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:41 pm

sma10 wrote:
AxaltaRacing24 wrote:
caneseddy wrote:Oh yay!!! One European run OTS and its all clear according to certain posters :roll:

The models are still having a bit of trouble with this trough/ridge scenario which could change..what we know for sure is there will be a Cat 4-Cat 5 in the Bahamas next week..who knows where it goes from there

Remember the latest GFS run had a run into Delmarva so anyone who says it's all clear is a fool..the entire east coast is still in pkay

Tuesday we will have a better idea when it's north of the islands

I honestly try to ignore it now. People have always been like this and it will most likely never change. But it's important to not sound all clear alarms over one run.


I actually feel the complete opposite.
I am not relieved by this run at all. For better or worse, the Euro at least looked fairly consistent (as consistent as synoptics can be 9-10 days out), and then threw a completely different picture out. As others have written, the setup is complex and the models haven't locked in.

Relieved? Hardly. The only thing we DO have a degree in confidence in is that the Leewards could be under threat and possibly the Bahamas too. 5 days the Euro and HWRF has this thing sitting around 21-22N 69-70W, a fairly threatening location. If the Euro repeats another 2 or 3 times in a row, then that will be comforting.

Yes. What we do have high confidence in is the path to the Bahamas and very near Florida. After that.....I don't know how anyone could feel a measure of relief with that track. Think...You're believing in a last minute deep north turn on a 10 day forecast. It's really quite a dangerous forecast for the East coast and possibly even the GOM.
2 likes   

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1759
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3249 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:41 pm

Alyono wrote:GFS is too fast for a recurve. Trough draws it into the coast. EC sped up slightly, to a speed just right to allow for a recurve. Any faster, and it hits the coast. Any slower, Irma misses the trough. Chances may not be good that it can repeat this next time

So it's really not an "east shift" but it connected to the trough this time. But with that pattern one day slower or faster and it's a FL through NC hit. Dangerous pattern shown on the 12z.
1 likes   

NJWxHurricane
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 145
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2016 11:51 am
Location: Seaside Heights, NJ (Jersey Shore)

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3250 Postby NJWxHurricane » Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:42 pm

stormreader wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:Finally! An out to sea run.. Figured this was coming. It was just a matter of time

An out to sea run does not mean an out to sea storm. We're still in the 10 day range here. It looks pretty certain that Irma will be very close to Florida. That's about it when it comes to confidence. In that case, I think the odds are weighted in favor of a U.S. Landfall. Going to keep my own personal "Irma window" open for Cape Fear North Carolina--to--North Cuban Coast. Still think there is a reasonable chance that Irma misses trough altogether. Thus keeping that southerly track as an option.

7 days*
0 likes   

hohnywx
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 511
Age: 34
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:34 pm
Location: Hastings-on-Hudson, NY

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3251 Postby hohnywx » Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:44 pm

The Euro Ens are coming in west of 00z...should be a red flag against the Euro OP
0 likes   

forecasterjack
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 195
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 3:44 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3252 Postby forecasterjack » Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:44 pm

Also of note is how favorable the environment will be in the Bahamas. SST's are super warm, ML RH is crazy high, and shear is limited/none. While the ECMWF shows some westerly 300mb flow, I think by then the storm's ULAC will be established enough to mitigate any interference from that. At the moment, confidence is unusually high in a high end cat 4 or even cat 5 storm in this area. The real uncertainty emerges once you get potential interaction with the mid latitude synoptic dynamics. Trough, ridge, cutoff, RWT influences etc. are all complicated and the models don't usually do a good job handling them. Hence the uncertainty there. But the uncertainty is unusually low that we'll get a crazy strong storm in/near the Bahamas.
Image
Image
Image
All that's available here: https://weather.us/model-charts/euro/72 ... 0600z.html just use menus to adjust parameters
3 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3253 Postby Steve » Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:44 pm

Steve wrote:
wxmann_91 wrote:
Steve wrote:
I'm finding this year, inside of 5. I realize that's anecdotal, but I do run them pretty much every day.

In general, yes. I meant inside Day 7 only specifically for Irma (the close to Lesser Antilles -> SE Bahamas track). Large, strong hurricanes in the deep tropics under a ridge usually have higher confidence track forecasts.


I gotcha. For me, specifically with Irma, I like the models for the next 90 hours or so. They almost are in full agreement with an overall spread inside of 150-200 miles. Courtesy of Mike's Weather Page (didn't want to hotlink):

EC Ensembles (but from 00z) which did telegraph the operational
http://www.weathernerds.org/tc_guidance ... g?56739613

GFS Ensembles 12Z - 100% landfall with the ones he charts
http://www.weathernerds.org/tc_guidance ... g?64355680

18Z lesser Guidance
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/stormin ... latest.png

SFWMD
https://my.sfwmd.gov/sfwmd/common/image ... s/storm_11

Literally everything is in line for 3-4 days. EC a little south of the consensus at the Islands. So I agree to that point. But I think the 5-8 days is fully suspect. Then will the Canadian high EC shows be too slow to stop Irma or is it working on becoming a block? I guess I have less confidence with Irma than you do in the 5-7 day range. I think it will be a Cat 4 and in the SW Atlantic at that point like the models generally do. But coming from S, SSE, SE? There's too much disparity. My take for now is there is a lot of flipping at this point except the GFS for now has settled on a mid-Atlantic system for a few runs. It will probably change and change again after that as it has adjusted northern upper patterns considerably. I guess I'm good for now with the models probably into about Wednesday am with a system north of Puerto Rico and coming up from the ESE at that point.


I forgot to add that it's notable that almost every model has us dealing with a major hurricane for at least 8 days. It will possibly get to Category 5 which is the benchmark for the strongest storms. I anticipate people's anxiety levels will be getting high early next week for a very large storm with a solid potential for landfalling as a 3, 4 or 5. Harvey woke people up. Stay ahead of the game if you're on the East Coast and if the majority of the models continue to indicate potential US Landfall.
Last edited by Steve on Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

User avatar
weathaguyry
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1272
Age: 22
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 5:16 am
Location: Long Island, NY

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3254 Postby weathaguyry » Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:45 pm

Timing will be absolutely key, and will make the difference between catastrophe and high waves+rip currents
1 likes   
My posts are only my opinions and NOT official forecasts. For official forecasts, consult the National Hurricane Center or the National Weather Service.

Irene 11', Sandy 12', Fay 20’, Isaias 20’, Elsa 21’, Henri 21’, Ida 21’

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3255 Postby wxmann_91 » Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:45 pm

Steve wrote:
wxmann_91 wrote:
Steve wrote:
I'm finding this year, inside of 5. I realize that's anecdotal, but I do run them pretty much every day.

In general, yes. I meant inside Day 7 only specifically for Irma (the close to Lesser Antilles -> SE Bahamas track). Large, strong hurricanes in the deep tropics under a ridge usually have higher confidence track forecasts.


I gotcha. For me, specifically with Irma, I like the models for the next 90 hours or so. They almost are in full agreement with an overall spread inside of 150-200 miles. Courtesy of Mike's Weather Page (didn't want to hotlink):

EC Ensembles (but from 00z) which did telegraph the operational
http://www.weathernerds.org/tc_guidance ... g?56739613

GFS Ensembles 12Z - 100% landfall with the ones he charts
http://www.weathernerds.org/tc_guidance ... g?64355680

18Z lesser Guidance
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/stormin ... latest.png

SFWMD
https://my.sfwmd.gov/sfwmd/common/image ... s/storm_11

Literally everything is in line for 3-4 days. EC a little south of the consensus at the Islands. So I agree to that point. But I think the 5-8 days is fully suspect. Then will the Canadian high EC shows be too slow to stop Irma or is it working on becoming a block? I guess I have less confidence with Irma than you do in the 5-7 day range. I think it will be a Cat 4 and in the SW Atlantic at that point like the models generally do. But coming from S, SSE, SE? There's too much disparity. My take for now is there is a lot of flipping at this point except the GFS for now has settled on a mid-Atlantic system for a few runs. It will probably change and change again after that as it has adjusted northern upper patterns considerably. I guess I'm good for now with the models probably into about Wednesday am with a system north of Puerto Rico and coming up from the ESE at that point.


I think that's fair. General point being fairly high confidence in the near-term through the SW Atlantic, but anything after that remains up in the air and not subject to change between individual model runs and solutions.
1 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3256 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:46 pm

AxaltaRacing24 wrote:
Alyono wrote:GFS is too fast for a recurve. Trough draws it into the coast. EC sped up slightly, to a speed just right to allow for a recurve. Any faster, and it hits the coast. Any slower, Irma misses the trough. Chances may not be good that it can repeat this next time

So it's really not an "east shift" but it connected to the trough this time. But with that pattern one day slower or faster and it's a FL through NC hit. Dangerous pattern shown on the 12z.


this run was not just a trough its also closed on a stonger low over canada that seemed to extend another piece of energy that drew it north. though I dont have the hi res Euro .. but the stronger low is quite apparent compared to 00z run.. so the synoptics are not even the same and its not just the forward speed of the hurricane.
Last edited by Aric Dunn on Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3257 Postby TheStormExpert » Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:46 pm

hohnywx wrote:The Euro Ens are coming in west of 00z...should be a red flag against the Euro OP

Are you able to post images?
0 likes   

forecasterjack
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 195
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 3:44 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3258 Postby forecasterjack » Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:47 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
AxaltaRacing24 wrote:
Alyono wrote:GFS is too fast for a recurve. Trough draws it into the coast. EC sped up slightly, to a speed just right to allow for a recurve. Any faster, and it hits the coast. Any slower, Irma misses the trough. Chances may not be good that it can repeat this next time

So it's really not an "east shift" but it connected to the trough this time. But with that pattern one day slower or faster and it's a FL through NC hit. Dangerous pattern shown on the 12z.


this run was not just a trough its also closed on a stonger low over canada that seemed to extend another piece of energy that drew it north. though I dont have the hi res Euro .. but the stronger low is quite apparent compared to 00z run.. so the synoptics are not even the same and its not just the forward speed of the hurricane.

High res Euro: https://weather.us/model-charts/euro/72 ... 0600z.html can click the map to zoom in or click into edges to pan. Use menus to adjust parameters and times. And btw, it's all free :)
0 likes   

forecasterjack
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 195
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 3:44 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3259 Postby forecasterjack » Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:48 pm

ECMWF ensembles. Uncertainty abounds.
Image
2 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#3260 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:52 pm

forecasterjack wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
AxaltaRacing24 wrote:So it's really not an "east shift" but it connected to the trough this time. But with that pattern one day slower or faster and it's a FL through NC hit. Dangerous pattern shown on the 12z.


this run was not just a trough its also closed on a stonger low over canada that seemed to extend another piece of energy that drew it north. though I dont have the hi res Euro .. but the stronger low is quite apparent compared to 00z run.. so the synoptics are not even the same and its not just the forward speed of the hurricane.

High res Euro: https://weather.us/model-charts/euro/72 ... 0600z.html can click the map to zoom in or click into edges to pan. Use menus to adjust parameters and times. And btw, it's all free :)


cool thanks. :)
2 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CM2 and 2 guests