ATL: IRMA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Vdogg
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:56 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5741 Postby Vdogg » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:43 am

Vdogg wrote:
MrJames wrote:CMC landfall in S FL but shifts track east with a second hit in NC

Image

So gfs and CMC move east to a Carolinas hit. Euro comes back from OTS to a Carolinas hit. Maybe, just maybe, we're dialing in on some sort of consensus. Ensembles should be interesting.

Isn't that, literally, the exact path of Donna?
0 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5742 Postby stormreader » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:44 am

Aric Dunn wrote:
psyclone wrote:
mcheer23 wrote:Not buying the brick wall turn

You don't have to buy it but nature often sells it. Matthew and Hermine last year both made abrupt turns. It's fairly common.


Downstream features that have not deveoped yet are terribly tricky to forecast. IF that low does not develop than no sharp north turn..



Well its true, that some of the ensemble don't have the radical north turn. They take the storm further west into the eastern Gulf of Mexico with a landfall in the big bend or even Appalachicola area.
1 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5743 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:44 am

RL3AO wrote:
pcolaman wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:models are still betting some sort of a low to develop over the MS valley... not buying into it yet..


I don't see it either ? There's really not much coming from the nw atm


It's subtle but it's there. Shortwave troughs going trough a longwave ridge get lost since the relative vorticity of the shortwave gets lost in the negative vorticity of the ridge.

Image



About 132 hours.. same as yesterday with most of the models.. that is the culprit.. without that low forming no sharp north turn

https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=375
Last edited by Aric Dunn on Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2776
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5744 Postby Frank P » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:45 am

stormreader wrote:
Frank P wrote:
bella_may wrote:No sharp NE turn this run. Trend is bad for the GOM


Disagree, this is not bad at all for the GOM ... this run doesn't even make the GOM... how can this be bad?

Well, I'm only referring to the extreme SE Gom, which with a shallower trough would allow entry there, before a move north along the Fl West Coast.

OK, I can buy that clarification and that certainly still is on the table... going to be a lot of model watching in the coming days.. I don't want anyone to get this, but no one more than me.. not going to build a third house..
3 likes   

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5745 Postby Michele B » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:46 am

Kat5 wrote:Trough looking about the same compared to the 06z run so far. Maybe will show a more northern turn before 80W.



We on the west coast of FL hope for that, sorry Miami, FLL WPB
0 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022

stormreader

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5746 Postby stormreader » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:46 am

otowntiger wrote:
1900hurricane wrote:
p1nheadlarry wrote:
That's currently over NE/SD right?

Looks like that feature is currently off the Pacific coast. It moves north into British Colombia and then dives southeast behind the main trough. It's a subtle feature, so it's hard to track unless you know what you're looking for.

Image
in 'looking at this clip, look at the high pressure retro grading significantly allowing Jose -to -be to go north out to sea could be enough to allow Irma to start turning north sooner- maybe?? Hopefully??

;My experience is that it usually works the other way around. Meaning future Jose, is completely blocked and never gets close to the East coast, but Irma well ahead, is forced further west than you would anticipate to get around the large ridge.
0 likes   

otowntiger
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1921
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5747 Postby otowntiger » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:48 am

fox13weather wrote:Paralleling the east coast and never making landfall in Florida is still very much in play.

Yep, I think a lot of widely diverse tracks are still in play.
1 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10147
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5748 Postby Blown Away » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:48 am

Both the GFS/GEM don't allow Irma to recurve OTS after Florida, pushes her into the Carolinas and goes NW... Not hitting the CONUS looking less likely by the hour... Hope the trend continues north, the latest GFS was a bit better for the NE Caribbean, PR, Hispaniola, and Cuba... Bahamas, well nothing to say but prepare...
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5749 Postby floridasun78 » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:49 am

JPmia wrote:https://weather.us/model-charts/standard/broward/windspeed-barbs/20170910-2100z.html

https://weather.us/model-charts/standard/florida/windspeed-barbs/20170911-0000z.html

So the latest GFS would do this to SE FL.. it's pure model fantasy, but quite interesting to look at.

this what miami was lucky with Andrew because want into south dade
1 likes   

MrJames
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 189
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Jax, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5750 Postby MrJames » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:49 am

Alyono wrote:MET OFFICE TROPICAL CYCLONE GUIDANCE FOR NORTH-EAST PACIFIC AND ATLANTIC

GLOBAL MODEL DATA TIME 1200UTC 04.09.2017

HURRICANE IRMA ANALYSED POSITION : 16.7N 52.7W

ATCF IDENTIFIER : AL112017

LEAD CENTRAL MAXIMUM WIND
VERIFYING TIME TIME POSITION PRESSURE (MB) SPEED (KNOTS)
-------------- ---- -------- ------------- -------------
1200UTC 04.09.2017 0 16.7N 52.7W 965 69
0000UTC 05.09.2017 12 16.3N 54.8W 968 75
1200UTC 05.09.2017 24 16.2N 57.2W 963 80
0000UTC 06.09.2017 36 16.6N 59.3W 963 73
1200UTC 06.09.2017 48 17.3N 61.7W 961 78
0000UTC 07.09.2017 60 18.0N 64.3W 958 78
1200UTC 07.09.2017 72 18.6N 67.0W 949 90
0000UTC 08.09.2017 84 19.2N 69.4W 949 83
1200UTC 08.09.2017 96 19.5N 72.4W 979 62
0000UTC 09.09.2017 108 19.8N 74.5W 970 67
1200UTC 09.09.2017 120 20.5N 76.6W 964 60
0000UTC 10.09.2017 132 21.3N 78.1W 962 68
1200UTC 10.09.2017 144 22.6N 78.8W 945 83


Mapped it via Google. UKMet sticking with the shredder run.
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5751 Postby Steve » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:50 am

HWRF is now running. at 39 hours it's NW of the 06Z position. I'm calling it:

06Z - 17.5N 60.3W @ 934mb
12Z - 17.8N 60.8W @ 930mb

https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0412&fh=39
0 likes   

pcolaman
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 380
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 9:33 am
Location: Pensacola Fla

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5752 Postby pcolaman » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:50 am

stormreader wrote:
otowntiger wrote:
1900hurricane wrote:Looks like that feature is currently off the Pacific coast. It moves north into British Colombia and then dives southeast behind the main trough. It's a subtle feature, so it's hard to track unless you know what you're looking for.

Image
in 'looking at this clip, look at the high pressure retro grading significantly allowing Jose -to -be to go north out to sea could be enough to allow Irma to start turning north sooner- maybe?? Hopefully??

;My experience is that it usually works the other way around. Meaning future Jose, is completely blocked and never gets close to the East coast, but Irma well ahead, is forced further west than you would anticipate to get around the large ridge.

And doesn't look like it gets as low as the trough passing atm
0 likes   

User avatar
Happy Pelican
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 119
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 11:12 pm
Location: Pelican Island, Jersey Shore

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5753 Postby Happy Pelican » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:50 am

fox13weather wrote:Paralleling the east coast and never making landfall in Florida is still very much in play.


My opinion, not a Professional, but that's what I keep feeling. Don't know why, but as Irma starts her turn north, I think the models are going to come East. That's not to say, East coast of Florida isn't going to see some damaging winds and flooding but fingers crossed they're spared the full brunt.
1 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10147
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5754 Postby Blown Away » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:54 am

MrJames wrote:
Alyono wrote:MET OFFICE TROPICAL CYCLONE GUIDANCE FOR NORTH-EAST PACIFIC AND ATLANTIC

GLOBAL MODEL DATA TIME 1200UTC 04.09.2017

HURRICANE IRMA ANALYSED POSITION : 16.7N 52.7W

ATCF IDENTIFIER : AL112017

LEAD CENTRAL MAXIMUM WIND
VERIFYING TIME TIME POSITION PRESSURE (MB) SPEED (KNOTS)
-------------- ---- -------- ------------- -------------
1200UTC 04.09.2017 0 16.7N 52.7W 965 69
0000UTC 05.09.2017 12 16.3N 54.8W 968 75
1200UTC 05.09.2017 24 16.2N 57.2W 963 80
0000UTC 06.09.2017 36 16.6N 59.3W 963 73
1200UTC 06.09.2017 48 17.3N 61.7W 961 78
0000UTC 07.09.2017 60 18.0N 64.3W 958 78
1200UTC 07.09.2017 72 18.6N 67.0W 949 90
0000UTC 08.09.2017 84 19.2N 69.4W 949 83
1200UTC 08.09.2017 96 19.5N 72.4W 979 62
0000UTC 09.09.2017 108 19.8N 74.5W 970 67
1200UTC 09.09.2017 120 20.5N 76.6W 964 60
0000UTC 10.09.2017 132 21.3N 78.1W 962 68
1200UTC 10.09.2017 144 22.6N 78.8W 945 83


Mapped it via Google. UKMet sticking with the shredder run.
Image


Seems Ukmet initializes .1 S and has Irma making down to 16.2 within 24 hours... Doesn't look that way as of now...
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

otowntiger
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1921
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5755 Postby otowntiger » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:54 am

RL3AO wrote:Image

I think the pressures on the GFS, given all the land interaction, is way too low and unrealistic. Anybody agree??
0 likes   

User avatar
p1nheadlarry
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 672
Age: 33
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:42 pm
Location: SR County FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5756 Postby p1nheadlarry » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:54 am

Vdogg wrote:
Vdogg wrote:
MrJames wrote:CMC landfall in S FL but shifts track east with a second hit in NC

Image

So gfs and CMC move east to a Carolinas hit. Euro comes back from OTS to a Carolinas hit. Maybe, just maybe, we're dialing in on some sort of consensus. Ensembles should be interesting.

Isn't that, literally, the exact path of Donna?


Donna made landfall further south than the OBX, but it's close
0 likes   
--;->#GoNoles--;->.

User avatar
MississippiWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1699
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5757 Postby MississippiWx » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:55 am

The biggest key won't be sampled by weather data until another day or two. The shortwave energy that dives south into the SE US comes from the upper low that is spinning off California. It goes due north over the top of the ridge and then dives south on the models. If this energy is not predicted correctly, it will have major implications on track. If it's stronger and faster than advertised, Irma might go east of Florida. If weaker or slower, then the opposite.
2 likes   
This post is not an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of MississippiWx and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2776
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5758 Postby Frank P » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:55 am

p1nheadlarry wrote:
Frank P wrote:
bella_may wrote:No sharp NE turn this run. Trend is bad for the GOM


Disagree, this is not bad at all for the GOM ... this run doesn't even make the GOM... how can this be bad?


It's the trends. We've gone further west each run, and more ensemble members are making it into the north/east gulf since Friday.


I don't disagree at all, many models have trended west over the past 12 hours... all I'm saying is the latest GFS did not trend to the GOM.. yes, its just one model, but who's to say this is not the beginning of more models trending to the east.. I have no idea, but I'll take every model that trends more east and be quite thankful for them... so we just continue to model watch .. would love to see this afternoons EURO keep that trend east going too.. :D
3 likes   

stormreader

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5759 Postby stormreader » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:56 am

MrJames wrote:
Alyono wrote:MET OFFICE TROPICAL CYCLONE GUIDANCE FOR NORTH-EAST PACIFIC AND ATLANTIC

GLOBAL MODEL DATA TIME 1200UTC 04.09.2017

HURRICANE IRMA ANALYSED POSITION : 16.7N 52.7W

ATCF IDENTIFIER : AL112017

LEAD CENTRAL MAXIMUM WIND
VERIFYING TIME TIME POSITION PRESSURE (MB) SPEED (KNOTS)
-------------- ---- -------- ------------- -------------
1200UTC 04.09.2017 0 16.7N 52.7W 965 69
0000UTC 05.09.2017 12 16.3N 54.8W 968 75
1200UTC 05.09.2017 24 16.2N 57.2W 963 80
0000UTC 06.09.2017 36 16.6N 59.3W 963 73
1200UTC 06.09.2017 48 17.3N 61.7W 961 78
0000UTC 07.09.2017 60 18.0N 64.3W 958 78
1200UTC 07.09.2017 72 18.6N 67.0W 949 90
0000UTC 08.09.2017 84 19.2N 69.4W 949 83
1200UTC 08.09.2017 96 19.5N 72.4W 979 62
0000UTC 09.09.2017 108 19.8N 74.5W 970 67
1200UTC 09.09.2017 120 20.5N 76.6W 964 60
0000UTC 10.09.2017 132 21.3N 78.1W 962 68
1200UTC 10.09.2017 144 22.6N 78.8W 945 83


Mapped it via Google. UKMet sticking with the shredder run.
Image

And then you see the UKMET images implying the sharp turn north late in the forecast run. GFS leveled out that south dip over Cuba. Will see what Euro does. But leveling out that south dip, I think, implies somewhat further west--so direct hit on S Fl. or even a tad further west than expected into extreme E GOM.
1 likes   

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#5760 Postby Michele B » Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:56 am

stormreader wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:
MrJames wrote:CMC landfall in S FL but shifts track east with a second hit in NC

Image


In other words, a reincarnation almost perfectly of Donna.


What I always liked about the Donna analog was the fact that it formed at almost the exact same date (Aug 29) in the Cabo Verde Islands area. Donna did not intensify quite as quickly as Irma, but still was a major hurricane well out to sea. Donna peaked at Cat 4 before entering the Keys and turning up into Fl and then paralleling the East seaboard. The similarities are obviously there.


Not sure about the stats on Donna while out in the Eastern Atlanta We didn't have the technology or instruments To track them like we do today
1 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests