ATL: IRMA - Models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Keeps coming NNW with center about to Asheville at 186 hours. Jose again gets blocked and deflected back. Not sure what the end game has in store for him. Last run had him coming back and swiping NC as a Cat 3.
0 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Hmm. Guess it's another wait for the Euro. Gotta work tomorrow so I'll check it in the morning. Not sure I'm buying this track. It's just...odd. Need to see the ensembles.
1 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
So, wouldn't the fujiwara effect come into play with Jose so close and start to pull Irma east a little?
Last edited by Vdogg on Mon Sep 04, 2017 5:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
HDGator wrote:AxaltaRacing24 wrote:
The entire Florida Peninsula hit with hurricane (64kt) + winds.
This would be CATASTROPHIC!
Someone used the term earlier "A Generational Storm".
I'd like to stop this ride and get off. PLEASE!
That was me. 2017, with our second Cat 4 hit in the wings, is getting to be a generational year as well. For those of us who are semi old, 1985, 1988, 1998, 2004 and 2005 are some of the benchmark years with 2004 and 2005 both featuring multiple major hits. 2017 looks to join that this weekend. We still have a good 45 days of prime season ahead too. Probably belongs in the "Indicators for 2017" thread on Talkin' Tropics. But the indicators to me are there are spots near the US Coast that can support extremely powerful hurricanes.
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34001
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Vdogg wrote:So, wouldn't the fujiwara effect come into play with Jose so close and start to pull It a east a little?
Too far away. Nicole was closer than that and couldn't influence Matthew's track.
2 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34001
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Steve wrote:HDGator wrote:AxaltaRacing24 wrote:
The entire Florida Peninsula hit with hurricane (64kt) + winds.
This would be CATASTROPHIC!
Someone used the term earlier "A Generational Storm".
I'd like to stop this ride and get off. PLEASE!
That was me. 2017, with our second Cat 4 hit in the wings, is getting to be a generational year as well. For those of us who are semi old, 1985, 1988, 1998, 2004 and 2005 are some of the benchmark years with 2004 and 2005 both featuring multiple major hits. 2017 looks to join that this weekend. We still have a good 45 days of prime season ahead too. Probably belongs in the "Indicators for 2017" thread on Talkin' Tropics. But the indicators to me are there are spots near the US Coast that can support extremely powerful hurricanes.
There's no reason why you can't get a very intense hurricane as late as November as well - 1932 a classic example...
1 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
RL3AO wrote:Alyono wrote:tarheelprogrammer wrote:Anyone think sub 900 mbs is a possibility like the models are showing?
may actually be more likely than not if it avoids mountains
It's hard not to think of the Labor Day hurricane when you watch that model run. It's happened before.
nothing like the Labor Day hurricane though. That was basically a large tornado in terms of its size. This one is gigantic! This is a large, WPAC typhoon moving in
2 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Kingarabian wrote:Alyono wrote:tarheelprogrammer wrote:Anyone think sub 900 mbs is a possibility like the models are showing?
may actually be more likely than not if it avoids mountains
Wasn't the GFS modeling Irma to be in the 920's now, east of the islands? GFS likely is 20-30mb too low. Not that it makes a difference impact wise, anyways.
No, GFS was in the 960s east of the islands
1 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Well I will have to say that if the Florida shield exists then it must be activated immediately! 

7 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
FixySLN wrote:I have a hard time buying that NW drive after the Southern Florida landfall. Wouldn't it be more likely that it run back up North through east coast looking for some more energy? Especially taking the cold air into consideration...Nags Head/Va Beach braces for whatever is left of her.
*Disclaimer*
I'm no Met...I don't even like making "predictions". I sometimes post my thoughts for others to see and am in NO way a voice of experience or professionalism.
It's got to go west at some point anyway. Aric was showing the cutoff down in the lower MS Valley which acts to draw it up and pinwheel it back while a surface high from Canada comes down from the north. Straight physics that even under the last run where it went back out and came in near GA/SC Border, it came up and hooked west toward southern Indiana. ECMWF shows it as well but it comes in farther north and on a NW heading through the SE US toward WV/SE Ohio.
More 18Z runs should be out soon.
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34001
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Alyono wrote:Kingarabian wrote:Alyono wrote:
may actually be more likely than not if it avoids mountains
Wasn't the GFS modeling Irma to be in the 920's now, east of the islands? GFS likely is 20-30mb too low. Not that it makes a difference impact wise, anyways.
No, GFS was in the 960s east of the islands
This would basically be Katrina or Rita at peak intensity making landfall.
0 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
I remember the early Katrina models showed it curving up in the big bend of Florida. Not buying it
1 likes
- Kingarabian
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 15829
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
- Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Alyono wrote:Kingarabian wrote:Alyono wrote:
may actually be more likely than not if it avoids mountains
Wasn't the GFS modeling Irma to be in the 920's now, east of the islands? GFS likely is 20-30mb too low. Not that it makes a difference impact wise, anyways.
No, GFS was in the 960s east of the islands
Some GFS runs were like this:

0 likes
RIP Kobe Bryant
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
blp wrote:Well I will have to say that if the Florida shield exists then it must be activated immediately!
Where was the 18Z GFS initialized this run?
Looked like it was down near 16.5N at 54W.
0 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
bella_may wrote:I remember the early Katrina models showed it curving up in the big bend of Florida. Not buying it
modeling is MUCH MUCH better than it was 12 years ago
We all know Florida is likely to get it. The question is does Hispañiola and or Cuba weaken it first?
3 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
bella_may wrote:I remember the early Katrina models showed it curving up in the big bend of Florida. Not buying it
Not sure Katrina turned out better. Unless Cuba's mountains rip this thing apart, this will be a once-in-a-generation landfall somewhere.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4029
- Age: 28
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
- Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
bella_may wrote:I remember the early Katrina models showed it curving up in the big bend of Florida. Not buying it
That was 12 years ago.
2 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged
- GeneratorPower
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1648
- Age: 45
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:48 pm
- Location: Huntsville, AL
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
lando wrote:If this run verified to a tee, 3 of the most populated counties in Florida would be almost destroyed, specifically by the western side of the eye wall, and a lot of the population of the immediate areas are lower income around the lake and unfortunately loss of life may be record breaking; god forbid the dyke failed...
I think "destroyed" is a bit much. Not likely to see Cat 5 damage over a three county area.
2 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
CrazyC83 wrote:Steve wrote:HDGator wrote:
The entire Florida Peninsula hit with hurricane (64kt) + winds.
This would be CATASTROPHIC!
Someone used the term earlier "A Generational Storm".
I'd like to stop this ride and get off. PLEASE!
That was me. 2017, with our second Cat 4 hit in the wings, is getting to be a generational year as well. For those of us who are semi old, 1985, 1988, 1998, 2004 and 2005 are some of the benchmark years with 2004 and 2005 both featuring multiple major hits. 2017 looks to join that this weekend. We still have a good 45 days of prime season ahead too. Probably belongs in the "Indicators for 2017" thread on Talkin' Tropics. But the indicators to me are there are spots near the US Coast that can support extremely powerful hurricanes.
There's no reason why you can't get a very intense hurricane as late as November as well - 1932 a classic example...
Hey CrazyC. I know. I don't even want to think about November at this point and the shot at a late Caribbean killer system. The way I see it, the NC/NE Gulf have only had some minor systems through. And the East Coast probably isn't done yet either. I'm predicting we'll all be storm-weary by November!
GFS at 234 has Irma out of there tied into a low in Newfoundland. Jose is dancing around between 58 and 63W. It does a loop and looks like it's sort of heading back west around 24.5 North with a big giant Canadian high centered just north of the Great Lakes. It will be interesting to see how the remainder of this GFS run does with that.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 418&fh=234
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests