ATL: IRMA - Models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2772
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
- Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
- Contact:
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Looks a tad south n west at h126 from the 18z
Last edited by Frank P on Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
RL3AO wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:thats just a piece of energy that has not cut off from the flow yet and turned into a full blown mid to upper low... thats the game changer for the north turn.. that little piece of energy would not turn it without cutting off and dropping sw..
No real changes from previous runs. As it digs further south, coriolis (f) goes down, zeta (cyclonic vorticity) goes up.
agreed.. still the same set up and low development... ill give it a couple more days before I jump on.. I have seen this happen many times.. just to have nothing develop..
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
-
- Admin
- Posts: 19990
- Age: 61
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

0 likes
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
The tight agreement in the models is not surprising. Well-established hurricanes being driven WNW tend to have lower forecast errors.
I'm not shocked, at all, that the 18Z and 0Z have very little differences in track through 120 hours.
18Z had some special soundings, and it doesn't appear the environmental flight found anything helpful that the GFS didn't already have in the grids.
Arrgh!
MW
I'm not shocked, at all, that the 18Z and 0Z have very little differences in track through 120 hours.
18Z had some special soundings, and it doesn't appear the environmental flight found anything helpful that the GFS didn't already have in the grids.
Arrgh!
MW
4 likes
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack
- Texas Snowman
- Storm2k Moderator
- Posts: 6151
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:29 am
- Location: Denison, Texas
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Islamorada is in deep trouble if that verifies....
2 likes
The above post and any post by Texas Snowman is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to NWS products.
- eastcoastFL
- Category 5
- Posts: 3900
- Age: 43
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
- Location: Palm City, FL
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Would this be the first identical back to back runs we've gotten thus far with Irma? I liked it better when they were flopping.
1 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1753
- Age: 24
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
- Location: Jupiter, FL
- wxmann_91
- Category 5
- Posts: 8013
- Age: 33
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
- Location: Southern California
- Contact:
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Alyono wrote:wxmann_91 wrote:eastcoastFL wrote:Holy crap it's going to go below 900mb again!?!
Ignore the pressures. GFS forecast intensities are unreliable for the most part.
unfortunately, these are actually plausible this time given the environment, assuming it misses the high mountains
The potential for downsloping off the Hispaniola and Cuban mountains gives me pause, especially given that Irma will be a large hurricane at that time. The only precedent for such low pressures in the area was the Labor Day hurricane 80 years ago, and it was a small hurricane. I consider sub-920mb to be a very low-probability solution at this time.
Last edited by wxmann_91 on Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4029
- Age: 28
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
- Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
1900hurricane wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:RL3AO wrote:
It's still there.
[image removed]
thats just a piece of energy that has not cut off from the flow yet and turned into a full blown mid to upper low... thats the game changer for the north turn.. that little piece of energy would not turn it without cutting off and dropping sw..
It's more defined this run if anything.
https://i.imgur.com/BxobKnU.gif
You can see the trends are just pretty much lining themselves up this run.
1 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2284
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 12:08 am
- Location: Baton Rouge, LA
- Contact:
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Aric Dunn wrote:RL3AO wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:
agreed.. still the same set up and low development... ill give it a couple more days before I jump on.. I have seen this happen many times.. just to have nothing develop..
So what does that mean if nothing develops? How would that affect track?
1 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6358
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
- Location: Miramar Bch. FL
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
So much for us hoping the data would cause a huge shift...nope GFS still going up the spine
Let's see what Euro says but no good news tonight for anyone
Let's see what Euro says but no good news tonight for anyone
Last edited by caneseddy on Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- Admin
- Posts: 19990
- Age: 61
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

0 likes
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34001
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
eastcoastFL wrote:Would this be the first identical back to back runs we've gotten thus far with Irma? I liked it better when they were flopping.
It seems we have honed in for 5 straight runs now, so we may be on to something. Also we are no longer in fantasyland either, but this is at day 5 where the turn is happening.
Landfall near Cape Romano on this run.
0 likes
- ObsessedMiami
- Category 1
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:08 pm
- Location: West Kendall, Fl
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
We asked for consistency. We asked for Data for the flights. We got them. And we still get the same, terrible result. Going to bed. Lots to do this week
Last edited by ObsessedMiami on Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
7 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Key Largo landfall at 891mb. I suppose it would be easier to completely dismiss this scenario if a similar location hadnt once experienced an 892mb landfall.
Last edited by sma10 on Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1753
- Age: 24
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
- Location: Jupiter, FL
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
There would be very little left of the middle and upper Keys if this GFS was to be correct 



0 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
AxaltaRacing24 wrote:
Basically still making landfall on the SW Fl coast there (GOM) to be technical.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests