Alyono wrote:tarheelprogrammer wrote:One thing I have noticed is that the CMC is initializing the storm at 980 mbs. Could that not have an impact on the track? Wouldn't a weaker storm move more west, as a strong storm would move more northerly when given the opportunity?
Why Irma is about to plow over the Leewards is because it has been so strong. The deep layer ridging affected it more. In the short term, the CMC may occur. However, once this moves into the Bahamas, the deeper system will then feel the weakness
We have to stop saying weak = west
I am confused (not surprising). I thought that stronger systems were known to "pump the ridge" and thus tend to head more westerly than otherwise.
Also, long as I am here...a question for the more experienced for this newbie:
Though I am sure that, at least for now, models indicate nothing about this storm moving as far west as TX, I want to the possibility as an example for my question. That is, what effect a previous storm, such as Harvey, might have on sea surface temperatures. Specifically, how long would it take before the churning effect from a previous storm would allow for temps to normalize to the extent that they could support a major storm? And, to what extent do models (and which models) take surface temps into account. I assume some models more than others, as I saw someone post that the GFS isn't as reliable as others for intensity purposes.
Sorry if the question(s) isn't eloquently stated...but at least I try!