ATL: IRMA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 19990
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6861 Postby tolakram » Tue Sep 05, 2017 7:37 am

Voltron wrote:Hry guys the ridge is stronger and the trough is elongated and appears to cut off while another ridge is building behind it. It appears that this will cause Itma to stop and make sharp turn north some 50-200 miles off FL and send it up coast. Anybody else seeing this?



Not sure what you are asking. Right now the models are seeing this, the questions are when, where, and what direction it heads after turning.
3 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

Vdogg
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:56 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6862 Postby Vdogg » Tue Sep 05, 2017 7:38 am

xtyphooncyclonex wrote:Stronger and moving more westerly than expected. Possible shift again in the 00z run, most likely closer to Cuba. Even if this weakens over Cuba (or after brushing the coast) this would still be extremely powerful. Not yet taking the expected WNW turn to the next forecast point.

Well it was slightly North of the last forecast point and that Northwest turn isn't supposed to happen for another 20 hours. That said, I would think the faster it goes makes it more likely to be picked up by the trough.
1 likes   

Vdogg
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:56 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6863 Postby Vdogg » Tue Sep 05, 2017 7:41 am

Kingslayer1254 wrote:
xtyphooncyclonex wrote:Stronger and moving more westerly than expected. Possible shift again in the 00z run, most likely closer to Cuba. Even if this weakens over Cuba (or after brushing the coast) this would still be extremely powerful. Not yet taking the expected WNW turn to the next forecast point.


Is it odd of me to think that the turn won't happen as expected. I am watching models and this system seems to be trucking along straight west and it is happy doing so. However, I know these things have a mind of their own. Still way to early to tell.

I remember seeing this same discussion with Joaquin (or maybe it was Matthew). I remember it was just trucking along, and people thought there was no way it was going to make that turn. But then it stopped and stalled for a bit and made the turn on its exact forecast point. It's possible.
3 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4811
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6864 Postby ronjon » Tue Sep 05, 2017 7:43 am

Vdogg wrote:
xtyphooncyclonex wrote:Stronger and moving more westerly than expected. Possible shift again in the 00z run, most likely closer to Cuba. Even if this weakens over Cuba (or after brushing the coast) this would still be extremely powerful. Not yet taking the expected WNW turn to the next forecast point.

Well it was slightly North of the last forecast point and that Northwest turn isn't supposed to happen for another 20 hours. That said, I would think the faster it goes makes it more likely to be picked up by the trough.


Actually the trough is forecast to lift out by 72 hours - another shortwave is forecast to develop in the lower Miss valley in 5-6 days. It is this system that turns the storm north. If the storm is slightly faster, it may make it into the eastern GOM before that turn. Lots of variables in play 5-6 days out yet.
2 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6865 Postby txwatcher91 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:06 am

The thing that needs to be watched is the energy diving from the Midwest. The reason the 06z GFS trended with a quicker turn and glancing blow on FL was because this energy was faster and stronger; thus breaking down the "thumb ridge" driving Irma WNW. If this does indeed occur, it will cause a quicker N turn and possibly spare Florida from a direct landfall. It's still too early to say for sure but the trends do need to be watched to see if 12z models continue to show this. This feature is only 84-108 hours out so it will start to be modeled better as it evolves.
1 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34001
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6866 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:15 am

txwatcher91 wrote:The thing that needs to be watched is the energy diving from the Midwest. The reason the 06z GFS trended with a quicker turn and glancing blow on FL was because this energy was faster and stronger; thus breaking down the "thumb ridge" driving Irma WNW. If this does indeed occur, it will cause a quicker N turn and possibly spare Florida from a direct landfall. It's still too early to say for sure but the trends do need to be watched to see if 12z models continue to show this. This feature is only 84-108 hours out so it will start to be modeled better as it evolves.


Even if Florida is spared, up the coast - and the Bahamas - would face a destructive hit though.
1 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6867 Postby txwatcher91 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:17 am

CrazyC83 wrote:
txwatcher91 wrote:The thing that needs to be watched is the energy diving from the Midwest. The reason the 06z GFS trended with a quicker turn and glancing blow on FL was because this energy was faster and stronger; thus breaking down the "thumb ridge" driving Irma WNW. If this does indeed occur, it will cause a quicker N turn and possibly spare Florida from a direct landfall. It's still too early to say for sure but the trends do need to be watched to see if 12z models continue to show this. This feature is only 84-108 hours out so it will start to be modeled better as it evolves.


Even if Florida is spared, up the coast - and the Bahamas - would face a destructive hit though.


Absolutely, it would change the impact zone from South FL landfall to scraping the coast or hitting SC/NC as a major hurricane. That's why this trend needs to be watched so closely because South Florida will likely be prepared, but if it pulls a Floyd scenario by just missing them and coming up the coast, SC/NC won't be as ready if they aren't closely watching this. Either way the Bahamas and Virgin Islands/PR look to get the worst of it in the short term.
1 likes   

Vdogg
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:56 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6868 Postby Vdogg » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:19 am

Looks like the center of the eye just crossed 16.8 N. 8:00 am advisory had it at 16.7. Ever so slightly starting to gain latitude. Perhaps next advisory will have WNW, though if I'm being honest it's more like WWNW. It'll be interesting to see how 12z takes this into account.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34001
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6869 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:22 am

txwatcher91 wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:
txwatcher91 wrote:The thing that needs to be watched is the energy diving from the Midwest. The reason the 06z GFS trended with a quicker turn and glancing blow on FL was because this energy was faster and stronger; thus breaking down the "thumb ridge" driving Irma WNW. If this does indeed occur, it will cause a quicker N turn and possibly spare Florida from a direct landfall. It's still too early to say for sure but the trends do need to be watched to see if 12z models continue to show this. This feature is only 84-108 hours out so it will start to be modeled better as it evolves.


Even if Florida is spared, up the coast - and the Bahamas - would face a destructive hit though.


Absolutely, it would change the impact zone from South FL landfall to scraping the coast or hitting SC/NC as a major hurricane. That's why this trend needs to be watched so closely because South Florida will likely be prepared, but if it pulls a Floyd scenario by just missing them and coming up the coast, SC/NC won't be as ready if they aren't closely watching this. Either way the Bahamas and Virgin Islands/PR look to get the worst of it in the short term.


A category 3 impact for them would likely be as severe as a category 4 impact in south Florida. The trees farther north aren't as hardy to hurricane winds and building codes aren't as strong.
1 likes   

User avatar
BensonTCwatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1046
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:11 pm
Location: Southport NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6870 Postby BensonTCwatcher » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:23 am

I don't think that we'll really know the US landfall solution until after Wed. Probably more like Thursday when the synoptic features are more in place. The break in the ridge and true timing of the trough are going to matter right when the angle of approach to the FL peninsula are most critical. We're getting down the most critical op runs and ensembles. UKMET is curious and I can't discount it given the history with this storm have to see if the EC ensembles shift.
2 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10140
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6871 Postby Blown Away » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:29 am

Image
12z Guidance... NHC S of most guidance, except for biggies Euro/Ukmet...
1 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10162
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6872 Postby SFLcane » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:30 am

Official track should shift now tcvn has it turning NW sharply into Florida.
4 likes   

User avatar
wzrgirl1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1323
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:44 am
Location: Pembroke Pines, Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6873 Postby wzrgirl1 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:31 am

Changes in models is to be expected even up until landfall. The one thing we can ascertain is a very dangerous major hurricane will be in the Sfl area around Saturday evening and even though they may not get a direct hit (we still don't know) this will have as much impact minimally as Wilma according to Bryan Norcross.
1 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6874 Postby Bocadude85 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:31 am

BensonTCwatcher wrote:I don't think that we'll really know the US landfall solution until after Wed. Probably more like Thursday when the synoptic features are more in place. The break in the ridge and true timing of the trough are going to matter right when the angle of approach to the FL peninsula are most critical. We're getting down the most critical op runs and ensembles. UKMET is curious and I can't discount it given the history with this storm have to see if the EC ensembles shift.


If you compare last night's 0z run of the UKMET to yesterday's 12z run the UKMET actually shifted west..it has been slowly shifting west.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23689
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6875 Postby gatorcane » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:35 am

12Z guidance. Looks to have shifted back east:

Image
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 19990
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6876 Postby tolakram » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:35 am

Models thread folks, and no model runs at the moment. I will be trimming posts back, don't take it personally. Please use the discussion thread if a post is not specifically model run related. Thanks.
3 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
chris_fit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3222
Age: 42
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:58 pm
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6877 Postby chris_fit » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:36 am

Here is a quick run down of the latest available ENSEMBLE Runs @ 140 hours ...

06Z GEFS
Image

00Z GEPS
Image

00Z EPS
Image
Last edited by chris_fit on Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34001
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6878 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:36 am

gatorcane wrote:12Z guidance. Looks to have shifted back east:

Image


What is the CTCI? That seems like a huge outlier - is that a model or an extrapolation?
1 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23689
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6879 Postby gatorcane » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:38 am

00Z UKMET is just east of Florida:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4811
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#6880 Postby ronjon » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:54 am

What is the CTCI? That seems like a huge outlier - is that a model or an extrapolation?

CTCI Previous Experimental COAMPS-TC Forecast Interpolated Ahead 6 hr

Here's a nice summary of all models:

http://derecho.math.uwm.edu/models/models.html
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests