tolakram wrote:18Z HWRF run
I've heard it's supposedly bad to follow the HWRF-P for some reason. Any truth to that?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
tolakram wrote:18Z HWRF run
bonjourno wrote:tolakram wrote:18Z HWRF run
[im g]https://i.imgur.com/cDvnkDP.gif[/img]
I've heard it's supposedly bad to follow the HWRF-P for some reason. Any truth to that?
txwatcher91 wrote:Bocadude85 wrote:txwatcher91 wrote:
The energy that will cause this to make the turn is inside 84 hours and becoming better modeled. The east coast of FL is the most likely track imo, a Floyd analog looks very reasonable here still. When you have an excellent model like the NAM inside 48 hours that’s showing such a weak finger ridge... and then models start to trend towards that, it’s something to take note of and consider. The NAM is excellent at picking up patterns and changes inside 48 hours that other models simply miss or play catch up on.
Those questioning the hard right turn haven’t seen and experienced past hurricanes that did. It can, and does, happen if the pattern supports it. All models agree on the north turn it’s just a matter of how long before that happens.
How do you explain the 18Z GFS ensemble mean that is significantly west of the OP run? When the ensembles don't agree with the op run that is usually a clue that there is something funky. Go through the GFS ensembles since 12z this morning..they have all be west of the op run. The NHC doesn't base their forecast off one model..they have other models available to them that are not available to the public.
Ensemble means are great tools outside 120 hours but OP runs are a little better inside that mark, imo. The Euro was way west of its ensemble mean, as well, so by the same reasoning it should be discountedYes the ensembles are west of the OP for the GFS but that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s right, or wrong. I’ve seen many of these storms over the years that are forecast to make a hard right turn and usually it occurs faster and sooner than anticipated. Also, I explained why the OP run has added weight since the NAM synoptic setup concurs with the GFS and the 18z HWRF also made a significant north shift through most of its run to match that also. There is plenty of time for further adjustments but the east of Florida track is what I’ve thought would happen all along and I’m sticking with it, along with my Floyd 99 analog.
txwatcher91 wrote:Bocadude85 wrote:txwatcher91 wrote:
The energy that will cause this to make the turn is inside 84 hours and becoming better modeled. The east coast of FL is the most likely track imo, a Floyd analog looks very reasonable here still. When you have an excellent model like the NAM inside 48 hours that’s showing such a weak finger ridge... and then models start to trend towards that, it’s something to take note of and consider. The NAM is excellent at picking up patterns and changes inside 48 hours that other models simply miss or play catch up on.
Those questioning the hard right turn haven’t seen and experienced past hurricanes that did. It can, and does, happen if the pattern supports it. All models agree on the north turn it’s just a matter of how long before that happens.
How do you explain the 18Z GFS ensemble mean that is significantly west of the OP run? When the ensembles don't agree with the op run that is usually a clue that there is something funky. Go through the GFS ensembles since 12z this morning..they have all be west of the op run. The NHC doesn't base their forecast off one model..they have other models available to them that are not available to the public.
Ensemble means are great tools outside 120 hours but OP runs are a little better inside that mark, imo. The Euro was way west of its ensemble mean, as well, so by the same reasoning it should be discountedYes the ensembles are west of the OP for the GFS but that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s right, or wrong. I’ve seen many of these storms over the years that are forecast to make a hard right turn and usually it occurs faster and sooner than anticipated. Also, I explained why the OP run has added weight since the NAM synoptic setup concurs with the GFS and the 18z HWRF also made a significant north shift through most of its run to match that also. There is plenty of time for further adjustments but the east of Florida track is what I’ve thought would happen all along and I’m sticking with it, along with my Floyd 99 analog.
Canelaw99 wrote:Does anyone have an updated graphic showing how well the models are performing so far? I've seen it over the last couple days, but not today, and it might be relevant at this point in the discussion. Thanks!
txwatcher91 wrote:
Ensemble means are great tools outside 120 hours but OP runs are a little better inside that mark, imo.
Canelaw99 wrote:Does anyone have an updated graphic showing how well the models are performing so far? I've seen it over the last couple days, but not today, and it might be relevant at this point in the discussion. Thanks!
RL3AO wrote:txwatcher91 wrote:
Ensemble means are great tools outside 120 hours but OP runs are a little better inside that mark, imo.
Do you have a scientific reason to make such a statement?
Javlin wrote:Well us here along the NGOM are forecast to have lows in the 60's till Monday and I mean 61'62' if this happens I cannot see Irma getting that far in the GOM.
txwatcher91 wrote:Bocadude85 wrote:txwatcher91 wrote:
The energy that will cause this to make the turn is inside 84 hours and becoming better modeled. The east coast of FL is the most likely track imo, a Floyd analog looks very reasonable here still. When you have an excellent model like the NAM inside 48 hours that’s showing such a weak finger ridge... and then models start to trend towards that, it’s something to take note of and consider. The NAM is excellent at picking up patterns and changes inside 48 hours that other models simply miss or play catch up on.
Those questioning the hard right turn haven’t seen and experienced past hurricanes that did. It can, and does, happen if the pattern supports it. All models agree on the north turn it’s just a matter of how long before that happens.
How do you explain the 18Z GFS ensemble mean that is significantly west of the OP run? When the ensembles don't agree with the op run that is usually a clue that there is something funky. Go through the GFS ensembles since 12z this morning..they have all be west of the op run. The NHC doesn't base their forecast off one model..they have other models available to them that are not available to the public.
Ensemble means are great tools outside 120 hours but OP runs are a little better inside that mark, imo. The Euro was way west of its ensemble mean, as well, so by the same reasoning it should be discountedYes the ensembles are west of the OP for the GFS but that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s right, or wrong. I’ve seen many of these storms over the years that are forecast to make a hard right turn and usually it occurs faster and sooner than anticipated. Also, I explained why the OP run has added weight since the NAM synoptic setup concurs with the GFS and the 18z HWRF also made a significant north shift through most of its run to match that also. There is plenty of time for further adjustments but the east of Florida track is what I’ve thought would happen all along and I’m sticking with it, along with my Floyd 99 analog.
MatthewsRevenge wrote:Looks like 00z is kinda backing away from this storm curving out of FL now but no clue where it will go. Guess it's waiting on Euro and GFS. Interesting to note that Alan is disregarding's GFS' 18z run... and he could very well be right. Like I said earlier, I think GFS overdid the performance of the shortwave supposedly coming. And I supposed GFS also expected a trough to pull through on that last run too. Hence why it went NE like that very sharply.
Javlin wrote:Well us here along the NGOM are forecast to have lows in the 60's till Monday and I mean 61'62' if this happens I cannot see Irma getting that far in the GOM.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests