ATL: IRMA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
SEASON_CANCELED
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 887
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:17 am
Location: 8 Bit Charlie Sheen

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8981 Postby SEASON_CANCELED » Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:02 pm

gatorcane wrote:12Z NAVGEM way west:

Image



yuck..no way. Fortunately its related to the NAM I can only recall on one hand how times that thing panned out in the last 10 years
2 likes   
i am a big stupid ugly moron with an ugly face and a big butt and my butt stinks and i like to kiss my own butt

BucMan2
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 108
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2015 10:05 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8982 Postby BucMan2 » Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:03 pm

Hello Everyone-

I am going to ask the same question that I asked about the UKM model , does the NAVGEM have any validity

Craig
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8983 Postby gatorcane » Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:04 pm

12Z HWRF shifts more SW:

Image
Last edited by gatorcane on Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8984 Postby Steve » Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:04 pm

That's the NAVGEM, not the NAM. But you're still right.
------------------------------------
HMON about to landfall at 66 hours (which would be 1am Sunday). It's a hair SW of the 06Z run where it's hitting Biscayne Park vs. Key Biscayne on the North side of the Bay.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=222
1 likes   

User avatar
SEASON_CANCELED
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 887
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:17 am
Location: 8 Bit Charlie Sheen

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8985 Postby SEASON_CANCELED » Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:04 pm

BucMan2 wrote:Hello Everyone-

I am going to ask the same question that I asked about the UKM model , does the NAVGEM have any validity

Craig



see my post above. rarely. but others are more qualified to answer
1 likes   
i am a big stupid ugly moron with an ugly face and a big butt and my butt stinks and i like to kiss my own butt

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8986 Postby Steve » Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:05 pm

BucMan2 wrote:Hello Everyone-

I am going to ask the same question that I asked about the UKM model , does the NAVGEM have any validity

Craig


Not much. It's something to look at. It has wild swings and can be biased East or West on different runs. You wouldn't bet your life on it, but it does have some statistical skill as they all do.
0 likes   

User avatar
SEASON_CANCELED
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 887
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:17 am
Location: 8 Bit Charlie Sheen

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8987 Postby SEASON_CANCELED » Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:05 pm

Steve wrote:That's the NAVGEM, not the NAM. But you're still right.
------------------------------------
HMON about to landfall at 66 hours (which would be 1am Sunday). It's a hair SW of the 06Z run where it's hitting Biscayne Park vs. Key Biscayne on the North side of the Bay.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=222


I thought NAVGEM and NAM were pretty close in coding but i learn something new or am corrected every summer
1 likes   
i am a big stupid ugly moron with an ugly face and a big butt and my butt stinks and i like to kiss my own butt

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8988 Postby Blinhart » Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:06 pm

Frank P wrote:
Craters wrote:The NHC has their storm-surge maps up for Irma in the graphics section.

Direct link to the model's inundation map:

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/refresh/graphic ... n#contents


I looked at that map and unless I am reading it wrong I don't see any surges 3 feet and greater north of South Miami... which means the highest expected from the areas north of South Miami up the coast through Sunday 5 pm could be up to, but not exceeding 6 feet.. I'm assuming 6 feet is a lot of surge for the greater Miami area.. I was thinking it might be possible up to the 9 foot range .. not that familiar with the potential surge affects on the SE coast of FL at this level, South Miami and areas south, levels were classified at up to 9 feet and greater as the max..... 6 feet with significant wave action would still do tremendous damage however for all the low lying structures, and I'm assuming there are a plethora of them... SW FL coastal areas show up to 9 feet and greater and that includes parts of Everglades city Chokoloskee, the area below is the Everglades...


The surge will be going up much more, I think that is for just 72 hours from when it was issued. By Saturday morning the map will probably be showing a lot of areas under 9 feet of water.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

USTropics
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2651
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8989 Postby USTropics » Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:09 pm

BucMan2 wrote:Hello Everyone-

I am going to ask the same question that I asked about the UKM model , does the NAVGEM have any validity

Craig


Below is how the models have performed so far with IRMA in relation to positional error (note the NGX is the NAVGEM and has not performed particularly well):
Image

Model bias at 72, 96, and 120 hours:
Image
2 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8990 Postby Steve » Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:10 pm

HMON now stays ashore in FL a little longer (Biscayne Park - WPB/Jupiter) so it's coming into line with the other models swinging from East toward West.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=369

HWRF is out to 48 hours and notably SW of the prior 2 runs
00Z - 23.50N 77.75W
06Z - 23.90N 77.95W
12Z - 23.40N 78.25W
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=313
Last edited by Steve on Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Soonercane

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8991 Postby Soonercane » Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:11 pm

This looks like a Floyd-clone to me, don't see how a storm can hit Florida from that trajectory.
1 likes   

miamijaaz
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 172
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 3:40 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8992 Postby miamijaaz » Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:11 pm

So GFS, HMON, CMC, NAVGEM and HWRF (still running, but west so far) all have shifted west at 72 hrs, in varying degrees. The Euro run is going to be interesting.
1 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8993 Postby Steve » Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:13 pm

SEASON_CANCELED wrote:
Steve wrote:That's the NAVGEM, not the NAM. But you're still right.
------------------------------------
HMON about to landfall at 66 hours (which would be 1am Sunday). It's a hair SW of the 06Z run where it's hitting Biscayne Park vs. Key Biscayne on the North side of the Bay.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=222


I thought NAVGEM and NAM were pretty close in coding but i learn something new or am corrected every summer


NAVGEM replaced the old Navy Nogaps which was usually entertaining but rarely on point.
2 likes   

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3352
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8994 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:14 pm

Soonercane wrote:This looks like a Floyd-clone to me, don't see how a storm can hit Florida from that trajectory.


Floyd-track is possible, but there's examples of storms with this kind of trajectory still hitting Florida. Hurricane Donna, for example.
1 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

JPmia
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 11:01 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8995 Postby JPmia » Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:16 pm

Anyone know how good or anything about this model?

 https://twitter.com/danleonard_wx/status/905841507214688256


1 likes   

User avatar
petit_bois
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 227
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: Petit Bois Island Mississippi

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8996 Postby petit_bois » Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:17 pm

yuck..no way. Fortunately its related to the NAM I can only recall on one hand how times that thing panned out in the last 10 years[/quote]

NAM had the jump on Katrina 3 days out... 1st to suggest landfall west of Florida panhandle. If my memory serves me right.
0 likes   
Resident of the Atlantic Basin's Major Hurricane Hit Capital!
Camille (200+winds), Frederic, Goerges, Katrina... and many many more.

Disclaimer: I'm likely the smartest guy here... but I have no idea where a tropical cyclone will go. I suggest you take my opinion as a grain of salt. I suggest you look to the National Hurricane Center for accurate info.

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8997 Postby AutoPenalti » Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:18 pm

JPmia wrote:Anyone know how good or anything about this model?

 https://twitter.com/danleonard_wx/status/905841507214688256



It's an experimental model, but that is definitely worse case scenario.
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

NFLnut
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 541
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 7:37 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8998 Postby NFLnut » Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:18 pm

Hypercane_Kyle wrote:
Soonercane wrote:This looks like a Floyd-clone to me, don't see how a storm can hit Florida from that trajectory.


Floyd-track is possible, but there's examples of storms with this kind of trajectory still hitting Florida. Hurricane Donna, for example.



Also looking eerily similar to a Matthew sequel, at least once it scoops up just parallel to the east coast of Florida. Question is: how close does it come inland or rake the coast, which was the same concern with Matthew. The GFS would be just fine with me.

Where is the Euro output? I thought it would be trickling out by now.
Last edited by NFLnut on Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#8999 Postby Steve » Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:19 pm

HWRF very close to landfall in SE FL at 66 hours and southwest of the last run that kept it offshore at 06Z.

https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0712&fh=66

HMON about to 2nd landfall just across the FL/GA Border at 90 hours
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=284
0 likes   

Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2776
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#9000 Postby Frank P » Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:19 pm

Blinhart wrote:
Frank P wrote:
Craters wrote:The NHC has their storm-surge maps up for Irma in the graphics section.

Direct link to the model's inundation map:

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/refresh/graphic ... n#contents


I looked at that map and unless I am reading it wrong I don't see any surges 3 feet and greater north of South Miami... which means the highest expected from the areas north of South Miami up the coast through Sunday 5 pm could be up to, but not exceeding 6 feet.. I'm assuming 6 feet is a lot of surge for the greater Miami area.. I was thinking it might be possible up to the 9 foot range .. not that familiar with the potential surge affects on the SE coast of FL at this level, South Miami and areas south, levels were classified at up to 9 feet and greater as the max..... 6 feet with significant wave action would still do tremendous damage however for all the low lying structures, and I'm assuming there are a plethora of them... SW FL coastal areas show up to 9 feet and greater and that includes parts of Everglades city Chokoloskee, the area below is the Everglades...


The surge will be going up much more, I think that is for just 72 hours from when it was issued. By Saturday morning the map will probably be showing a lot of areas under 9 feet of water.


Per the NHC surge map
NHC Potential Storm Surge Flooding Map
Hurricane IRMA (2017) Advisory 34
From 11 AM EDT THURSDAY September 07 to 05 PM EDT SUNDAY September 10
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests