Extreme wind threat.
Extreme storm surge threat.

https://twitter.com/NWSKeyWest/status/905933005759414272
Moderator: S2k Moderators
superdeluxe wrote:Is it a bit irresponsible for this promet to be posting this?
it feels a bit hyperbolic
@RyanMaue
Based on size of Hurricane #Irma + Category 4/5 landfall winds/surge & track up I-75 to Atlanta, are we contemplating a Trillion $ disaster?
KBBOCA wrote:superdeluxe wrote:Is it a bit irresponsible for this promet to be posting this?
it feels a bit hyperbolic
@RyanMaue
Based on size of Hurricane #Irma + Category 4/5 landfall winds/surge & track up I-75 to Atlanta, are we contemplating a Trillion $ disaster?
Yes, I quibble a lot with Ryan Maue's tweets. Most of his info is sound, but he does go for the sensationalist approach at times. Sadly with Irma, most of his sensationalism early on proved right on target, so I've downplayed my criticism of him.
But I agree with you, this latest tweet seems over done.
Evil Jeremy wrote:SEASON_CANCELED wrote:turnpike is overwhelmed. would advise to use back roads
I love the back roads for evacuations. Used them to get far from Jacksonville/Matthew last year (and back). They're generally empty, more peaceful, and you get to see new sights.
KBBOCA wrote:KBBOCA wrote:Zarniwoop wrote:If it goes up the spine, Orlando wouldn't get devastating winds would it? We just moved from there and have a fair number of friends I need to start working on if this is predicted to hold together bizarrely well over land.
So, I think you should be prepared for significant winds in Orlando. NHC graphic to follow as soon as I find it.
Here's the latest windspeed probabilities from NHC.
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/text/refresh/MI ... 2058.shtml
If I'm reading it correctly, 63% cumulative percent chance of sustained winds of 58 MPH; 42% cumulative probability of winds 74 MPH.
Also, look at your forecast office (Melbourne FL). They have a graphical weather forecast which shows you the risks ahead. It takes a bit of playing with to figure out, but here's Sunday night wind gusts:
https://graphical.weather.gov/sectors/mlb.php
For Sunday night, gusts in Orlando could reach 89 knots (102 MPH)!
Kingslayer1254 wrote:Can someone please explain to me how this system is to turn right .. I mean can something this big just hit the brakes and turn right??
NDG wrote:SE quadrant definitely weaker but that's where is missing an inner eyewall, pressure remains low.
232930 2058N 07133W 6966 02690 9477 +151 +081 212114 116 093 000 03
233000 2100N 07135W 6965 02650 9430 +152 +096 214116 117 097 000 00
233030 2101N 07136W 6965 02597 9382 +144 +103 213120 120 100 002 00
233100 2102N 07137W 6957 02545 9341 +120 +116 211109 120 102 004 00
233130 2103N 07139W 6975 02479 9276 +138 +111 213083 097 100 003 03
233200 2104N 07140W 6961 02461 9219 +164 +112 213060 074 077 004 00
233230 2105N 07142W 6970 02435 9188 +180 +103 213037 052 054 002 00
233300 2106N 07144W 6966 02429 9187 +172 +106 217016 030 031 001 03
233330 2107N 07145W 7006 02371 9178 +176 +106 217001 011 019 000 00
233400 2108N 07147W 6957 02432 9178 +171 +101 060010 014 016 001 00
233430 2109N 07148W 6967 02420 9187 +164 +109 056018 021 019 002 00
233500 2111N 07149W 6965 02429 9195 +161 +109 063027 030 029 002 00
233530 2112N 07151W 6964 02439 9203 +160 +107 064037 041 034 002 00
stormreader wrote:1900hurricane wrote:Considering the current state of eyewall replacement, I still think we're 12-18 hours away from returning to a single eyewall with a clearing eye. The outer eyewall does appear to be gaining dominance on microwave imagery, but considering the large radius of the outer eyewall, it may take some time for it to fully kill of the inner eyewall.
I should also mention that eyewall replacement is still rather unpredictable, even as it is occurring. I've seen plenty of storms botch eyewall replacement for whatever reason and end up in a structural flux. I've also seen systems complete massive eyewall replacement projects in relatively short periods of time when I fully didn't expect it to even complete. Eyewall replacement has kicked my butt in the past, and I'm sure it will in the future. Whether it does here in this instance with Irma remains to be seen.
Putting you on the spot, an average time between ERC's for Cat 4's and 5's might be???? or is it something not that well understood?
Kingarabian wrote:Doesn't look like a cat.5 anymore. I know it's the weaker side but the winds are barely 120kts -- unless im missing something.
Kingarabian wrote:Doesn't look like a cat.5 anymore. I know it's the weaker side but the winds are barely 120kts -- unless im missing something.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests