NDG wrote:ScottNAtlanta wrote:How many ACE points has Irma accumulated thus far?
As of 2 pm today, 54
Damn...thats half of a normal season!!!
Moderator: S2k Moderators
NDG wrote:ScottNAtlanta wrote:How many ACE points has Irma accumulated thus far?
As of 2 pm today, 54
ScottNAtlanta wrote:NDG wrote:ScottNAtlanta wrote:How many ACE points has Irma accumulated thus far?
As of 2 pm today, 54
Damn...thats half of a normal season!!!
meriland29 wrote:Wait, did recon find 166mph winds last pass? I just read that I thought. If so, that is quite a impressively significant jump in such a short time. Was it flagged?
tolakram wrote:BYG Jacob wrote:BYG Jacob wrote:Also, does anybody know where the shear went? The past few years in the Atlantic it was crazy strong and pretty much killed everything aside from a few lucky storms, and now its just gone.
Can anybody answer this? Is it ridging or...?
Not really a short answer, it's all about global weather patterns, el nino, la nina, etc. Something you can study by using google (wind shear, hurricane, etc). This year we are warm neutral and obviously shear is running below normal, but it's also a bit of luck (or bad luck). Just a few weeks ago we were thinking this would be a slow season due to the early cold outbreaks in the midwest. Still a lot to learn about hurricane seasons.
Aric Dunn wrote:they will probably go with 165 mph now.. sheesh .. and it will likely get even stronger.. geezz//
JBCycloneStan wrote:GTStorm wrote:JBCycloneStan wrote:
Not seeing it. In fact, saw a WNW-NW jog in the last few frames.
Looks to be heading exactly towards the next NHC forecast point (09 / 0600z). Wish I knew how to post link, just go to the NHC satellite imagery site and click on fcst points.
At this point they've probably got it pretty well nailed down.
Its pretty insane how well the NHC has been able to forecast the track within 24-48 hours. Really shows how far the science has come.
TheStormExpert wrote:I think the east coast of Florida dodged a HUGE bullet once again for the second year in the row with this one. Just like Matthew here in West Palm Beach we probably won't get above strong-TS force winds.
WeatherGuesser wrote:ScottNAtlanta wrote:NDG wrote:
As of 2 pm today, 54
Damn...thats half of a normal season!!!
That's more than half of the current total for the West Pacific.
Nederlander wrote:tolakram wrote:BYG Jacob wrote:Can anybody answer this? Is it ridging or...?
Not really a short answer, it's all about global weather patterns, el nino, la nina, etc. Something you can study by using google (wind shear, hurricane, etc). This year we are warm neutral and obviously shear is running below normal, but it's also a bit of luck (or bad luck). Just a few weeks ago we were thinking this would be a slow season due to the early cold outbreaks in the midwest. Still a lot to learn about hurricane seasons.
Just something I have noticed, and I am sure the experts on here already know the reason why, but when the Pacific is churning out TC after TC, the Atlantic basin is dead and full of shear/sal. The reverse seems to be true most of the time as well, Atlantic is alive and Pacific is dead. Our atmosphere is quite interesting.
TheProfessor wrote:What the heck happened to the movement of Irma? I had to send my computer to be repaired on Wednesday, last time I saw Irma in Motion was yesterday missy as she was passing Hispaniola and was approaching the Bahamas and looked to stay north of Cuba, did she take a sharp left turn?
BYG Jacob wrote:Nederlander wrote:tolakram wrote:
Not really a short answer, it's all about global weather patterns, el nino, la nina, etc. Something you can study by using google (wind shear, hurricane, etc). This year we are warm neutral and obviously shear is running below normal, but it's also a bit of luck (or bad luck). Just a few weeks ago we were thinking this would be a slow season due to the early cold outbreaks in the midwest. Still a lot to learn about hurricane seasons.
Just something I have noticed, and I am sure the experts on here already know the reason why, but when the Pacific is churning out TC after TC, the Atlantic basin is dead and full of shear/sal. The reverse seems to be true most of the time as well, Atlantic is alive and Pacific is dead. Our atmosphere is quite interesting.
I think that's the balance of our planet. Just not enough energy for everywhere to go crazy at once.
TheStormExpert wrote:I think the east coast of Florida dodged a HUGE bullet once again for the second year in the row with this one. Just like Matthew here in West Palm Beach we probably won't get above strong-TS force winds.
WeatherOrKnot wrote:Raebie wrote:tailgater wrote: That's what I be seeing, 1/3 of the eyewall is on the coast now and still seems to be heading closer to west than wnw. Good for us bad for Cuba
1/3 of the eyewall is on the coast? Sure doesn't look like it.
It's not.
tolakram wrote:TheStormExpert wrote:I think the east coast of Florida dodged a HUGE bullet once again for the second year in the row with this one. Just like Matthew here in West Palm Beach we probably won't get above strong-TS force winds.
Please don't say dumb things like this. Look at the model output, look at the size of the storm.
Got SLIDER to work, boy the GOES16 images are so much nicer than the old GOESE
[img ]https://i.imgur.com/hhjVRDw.png[/img]
tolakram wrote:
stormreader wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:they will probably go with 165 mph now.. sheesh .. and it will likely get even stronger.. geezz//
Yes, I thought the 160 mph for S Fl landfall was conservative. No blame. We're in uncharted waters with this storm. 160 is Cat 5 and that should get anybody's attention. Could be a reasonable chance for this to get to 175-180 again. I'll leave it at that.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests