cjrciadt wrote:Sun just broke out here![]()
I don't wanna see sun until our power is back on lol. It can stay overcast and a bit cool until then lol
Moderator: S2k Moderators
cjrciadt wrote:Sun just broke out here![]()
cjrciadt wrote:Sun just broke out here![]()
wxman57 wrote:Irma doesn't look tropical any longer. Its core is gone and it appears to have merged with the cold front. This makes it a much larger storm than it was at landfall, but without the intense core winds. Giant tropical storm.
SouthDadeFish wrote:wxman57 wrote:Irma's mid-level center (seen on radar) has completely decoupled from the low-level center and is accelerating NNE. Low-level center is lagging about 60-70 miles behind.
I agree that this is no longer tropical. Although at this point, the large wind radii probably creates worse impacts compared to the typical decaying TS.
As a side note, this storm serves as a good reminder how vulnerable South FL is to intense hurricanes. Even with the center moving ashore near Marco Island, there was a storm surge of a couple feet in Miami. Furthermore, if the south side of Irma's core wasn't so eroded, storm surge on the west coast of FL would have been much worse. For as bad as Irma was in FL, I'm thankful that the worst-case scenarios did not verify. Unfortunately, I don't think many other places in the Caribbean can say the same. My prayers go out to all those affected by the storm.
Alyono wrote:SouthDadeFish wrote:wxman57 wrote:Irma's mid-level center (seen on radar) has completely decoupled from the low-level center and is accelerating NNE. Low-level center is lagging about 60-70 miles behind.
I agree that this is no longer tropical. Although at this point, the large wind radii probably creates worse impacts compared to the typical decaying TS.
As a side note, this storm serves as a good reminder how vulnerable South FL is to intense hurricanes. Even with the center moving ashore near Marco Island, there was a storm surge of a couple feet in Miami. Furthermore, if the south side of Irma's core wasn't so eroded, storm surge on the west coast of FL would have been much worse. For as bad as Irma was in FL, I'm thankful that the worst-case scenarios did not verify. Unfortunately, I don't think many other places in the Caribbean can say the same. My prayers go out to all those affected by the storm.
think the track also saved the west coast from the surge. Had it been offshore, even coming in at Charlotte Harbor, Naples would have got the full 15 feet
GBPackMan wrote:Alyono wrote:SouthDadeFish wrote:
I agree that this is no longer tropical. Although at this point, the large wind radii probably creates worse impacts compared to the typical decaying TS.
As a side note, this storm serves as a good reminder how vulnerable South FL is to intense hurricanes. Even with the center moving ashore near Marco Island, there was a storm surge of a couple feet in Miami. Furthermore, if the south side of Irma's core wasn't so eroded, storm surge on the west coast of FL would have been much worse. For as bad as Irma was in FL, I'm thankful that the worst-case scenarios did not verify. Unfortunately, I don't think many other places in the Caribbean can say the same. My prayers go out to all those affected by the storm.
think the track also saved the west coast from the surge. Had it been offshore, even coming in at Charlotte Harbor, Naples would have got the full 15 feet
Looking at the pictures from my area of the western FL panhandle and northern gulf coast, these bays and bayous were draining as it sucked the water from up here to shove it on the western coast of FL.
CrazyC83 wrote:One thing we can guarantee: once Irma is done (assuming it doesn't get caught in the trough and regenerate in the Atlantic), that will be it for her, forever. The name will surely be retired. Just like with brother Harvey, thesurely awaits...after just one run on the list. Won't be seeing you in 2023 either, Irma!
GBPackMan wrote:Alyono wrote:SouthDadeFish wrote:
I agree that this is no longer tropical. Although at this point, the large wind radii probably creates worse impacts compared to the typical decaying TS.
As a side note, this storm serves as a good reminder how vulnerable South FL is to intense hurricanes. Even with the center moving ashore near Marco Island, there was a storm surge of a couple feet in Miami. Furthermore, if the south side of Irma's core wasn't so eroded, storm surge on the west coast of FL would have been much worse. For as bad as Irma was in FL, I'm thankful that the worst-case scenarios did not verify. Unfortunately, I don't think many other places in the Caribbean can say the same. My prayers go out to all those affected by the storm.
think the track also saved the west coast from the surge. Had it been offshore, even coming in at Charlotte Harbor, Naples would have got the full 15 feet
Looking at the pictures from my area of the western FL panhandle and northern gulf coast, these bays and bayous were draining as it sucked the water from up here to shove it on the western coast of FL.
stormreader wrote:We didn't seem to have the focal point for sustained winds at landfall in Fl that, for instance, you had with Harvey in Texas. Same intensity with landfall of two storms---Irma in keys (slightly weaker at Marco Island) and Harvey at Rockport. But every storm is different. Harvey was going through a quick intensification cycle, had never yet made a landfall, while Irma was an older storm coming off of many hours over Cuba. So there was no scene in Fl like that of Rockport, Tx damage. However, the size and scope of the storm I found very impressive (80-90 mph) over large areas and for many hours after landfall. Still incredible energy with the storm, but it seemed to be more evenly spread and not quite so focused at the central point.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests