
0z has a decent shift W compared to the 18z, with the NHC track now on the Eastern Edge of the guidance
Moderator: S2k Moderators
wxman57 wrote:Here's the model verification for Jose. UK is best at 120hrs, but still off by about 210 miles. I don't know about the east coast trof vanishing in the next day or two.
http://www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/ta ... 7/maeI.png
Aric Dunn wrote:Steve wrote:plasticup wrote:Any insight into why there is such a massive discrepancy?
Yeah. He speculated on the last page that it's initialized farther SE than the NHC and some of the other models.
The thing i just noticed is the ukmet intialized it further ese from the nhc 11am position. Which is where i pegged the center earlier. It has been moving ese for at least 8 hours
Also just 2 posts ip..![]()
![]()
Kingarabian wrote:Has there ever been an occurrence where the UKMET differed completely from the GFS+Euro for this long of a period of time? I can't recall any...
an upgrade doesnt automatically mean better performance either, countless computer programs have been upgraded over the years only to have users downgrade due to performance issues...AutoPenalti wrote:1900hurricane wrote:wxman57 wrote:
...so did the GFS...
"Upgrade."
An upgrade is still an upgrade my friend, the difference is how it's executed.
txwatcher91 wrote:Kingarabian wrote:Has there ever been an occurrence where the UKMET differed completely from the GFS+Euro for this long of a period of time? I can't recall any...
Hurricane Matthew last year was one I remember very well. The Euro kept trending east towards Bermuda and well out to sea and the UK kept inching west closer to Florida. Similar to what we’ve seen today with the disparity growing. The UK ended up being right and the Euro caved to it big time.
Aric Dunn wrote:ColdMiser123 wrote:Clear southward bias on the UKMET tracks compared to the Euro tracks.
http://www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/ta ... 17/tr3.png
http://www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/ta ... 17/tr4.png
probelm is the fixes have been off the last 12 hours.. ... and its even more clear now that the UKMET is doing better..
like alyono said, we will know in a couple of days and if this ukmet verifies than some people on tv have some major explaining to doAric Dunn wrote:ColdMiser123 wrote:Clear southward bias on the UKMET tracks compared to the Euro tracks.
http://www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/ta ... 17/tr3.png
http://www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/ta ... 17/tr4.png
problem is the fixes have been off the last 12 hours.. ... and its even more clear now that the UKMET is doing better..
Kingarabian wrote:txwatcher91 wrote:Kingarabian wrote:Has there ever been an occurrence where the UKMET differed completely from the GFS+Euro for this long of a period of time? I can't recall any...
Hurricane Matthew last year was one I remember very well. The Euro kept trending east towards Bermuda and well out to sea and the UK kept inching west closer to Florida. Similar to what we’ve seen today with the disparity growing. The UK ended up being right and the Euro caved to it big time.
But the difference between the UK and the Euro in regards to Matthew wasn't that large as in this case...
ColdMiser123 wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:ColdMiser123 wrote:Clear southward bias on the UKMET tracks compared to the Euro tracks.
[img]http://www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/tang/tcguidance/al122017/tr3.png[/mg]
[img]http://www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/tang/tcguidance/al122017/tr4.png[/mg]
probelm is the fixes have been off the last 12 hours.. ... and its even more clear now that the UKMET is doing better..
The current SE movement is not inconsistent with the Euro forecasts yet.
Aric Dunn wrote:ColdMiser123 wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:
probelm is the fixes have been off the last 12 hours.. ... and its even more clear now that the UKMET is doing better..
The current SE movement is not inconsistent with the Euro forecasts yet.
neither is the UKMET>
Aric Dunn wrote:wxman57 wrote:Here's the model verification for Jose. UK is best at 120hrs, but still off by about 210 miles. I don't know about the east coast trof vanishing in the next day or two.
http://www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/ta ... 7/maeI.png
That is the intensity
Aric Dunn wrote:ColdMiser123 wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:
neither is the UKMET>
It is currently performing the worst compared to other models with recent short term trends. Here is the GFS for comparison.
The 18z run was a bit too far south compared to observations, and even that was offshore.
http://www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/ta ... 17/tr1.png
again the current sab postions are very off at this point compared to current analysis..
ColdMiser123 wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:ColdMiser123 wrote:
It is currently performing the worst compared to other models with recent short term trends. Here is the GFS for comparison.
The 18z run was a bit too far south compared to observations, and even that was offshore.
[img]http://www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/tang/tcguidance/al122017/tr1.png[img]
again the current sab postions are very off at this point compared to current analysis..
I disagree. Unlikely the current observed estimates are off significantly enough to change the conclusions reached above.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests