ATL: MARIA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#401 Postby Hurricaneman » Sat Sep 16, 2017 11:22 pm

SFLcane wrote:Weakness " excape alley " left by Jose there once again should allow for this to to recurve.


This run is trash, has Jose strengthening over water around 68 to 70 degrees which opens a weakness for Maria which will probably not be there or be a weaker weakness which may turn it more NW possibly threatening the SE states from The eastern GOM to North Carolina
1 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#402 Postby txwatcher91 » Sat Sep 16, 2017 11:25 pm

Hurricaneman wrote:
SFLcane wrote:Weakness " excape alley " left by Jose there once again should allow for this to to recurve.


This run is trash, has Jose strengthening over water around 68 to 70 degrees which opens a weakness for Maria which will probably not be there or be a weaker weakness which may turn it more NW possibly threatening the SE states from The eastern GOM to North Carolina


It wouldn’t strengthen over the cool waters in the NE like the GFS shows but as it loops back east and south it would be over or near the Gulf Stream... and waters are plenty warm there.

Image
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#403 Postby Alyono » Sat Sep 16, 2017 11:26 pm

Canadian may be the only model with a reasonable representation at the moment

UKMET now shoves Jose WEST into NYC (at least it weakens it as it does so)

Canadian actually ejects Jose as in agreement with the ensembles
1 likes   

shah83
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 302
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 4:55 pm

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#404 Postby shah83 » Sat Sep 16, 2017 11:26 pm

The real problem is that for the next two, maybe three days, the GFS runs will be trash. Gonna have to rely on GEFS... But we need to have a good idea for planning purposes NOW. If we wait until Jose leaves or dissipates, that leaves maybe three to four days to narrow the cone from a thousand miles to maybe a couple hundred before landfall...
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#405 Postby Alyono » Sat Sep 16, 2017 11:28 pm

shah83 wrote:The real problem is that for the next two, maybe three days, the GFS runs will be trash. Gonna have to rely on GEFS... But we need to have a good idea for planning purposes NOW. If we wait until Jose leaves or dissipates, that leaves maybe three to four days to narrow the cone from a thousand miles to maybe a couple hundred before landfall...


one should be using an ensemble of ensembles. That is the only method to accurately get the uncertainty
1 likes   

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#406 Postby sma10 » Sat Sep 16, 2017 11:33 pm

Alyono wrote:Canadian may be the only model with a reasonable representation at the moment


Gotta admit - you don't hear this very often. :D
4 likes   

Craters
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 421
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:34 pm
Location: Alvin, TX (south of Houston)

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#407 Postby Craters » Sat Sep 16, 2017 11:34 pm

Alyono wrote:not usableafter PR

GFS thinks Jose will somehow intensify after it goes stationary over cool waters. Whole run should be thrown out after 132 hours as it is not physically possible as GFS portrays it to be


Alyono -- I might be oversimplifying things, but that seems to be an exceedingly fundamental, basic, first-principles sort of fly in the ointment. Jose would be over cooler water and it would be at a high latitude, so Coriolis forces would be greater (Does anything stay stationary at that latitude?). Could it have transitioned to being extratropical? How could such a flagrant error propagate itself through the run?

I guess what I'm having trouble grasping is the fact that this kind of thing doesn't involve just a sign error or something simple like that in the GFS calculations -- it has to be a whole mind-numbing chain of solutions to God-only-knows how many differential equations, physical laws, etc. How is something like that possible in what is, in reality, a world-class global model? I just don't get it...

Thanks --

Mark
0 likes   
Nothing that I post here should ever be treated as a forecast or anything resembling one. Please check with your local NWS office or the NHC for forecasts, watches, and warnings.

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#408 Postby Alyono » Sat Sep 16, 2017 11:37 pm

Craters wrote:
Alyono wrote:not usableafter PR

GFS thinks Jose will somehow intensify after it goes stationary over cool waters. Whole run should be thrown out after 132 hours as it is not physically possible as GFS portrays it to be


Alyono -- I might be oversimplifying things, but that seems to be an exceedingly fundamental, basic, first-principles sort of fly in the ointment. Jose would be over cooler water and it would be at a high latitude, so Coriolis forces would be greater (Does anything stay stationary at that latitude?). Could it have transitioned to being extratropical? How could such a flagrant error propagate itself through the run?

I guess what I'm having trouble grasping is the fact that this kind of thing doesn't involve just a sign error or something simple like that in the GFS calculations -- it has to be a whole mind-numbing chain of solutions to God-only-knows how many differential equations, physical laws, etc. How is something like that possible in what is, in reality, a world-class global model? I just don't get it...

Thanks --

Mark


Jose is not ET in the GFS. The simulated IR shows a well formed hurricane. Very tropical with an eye
0 likes   

User avatar
Hybridstorm_November2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2811
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
Contact:

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#409 Postby Hybridstorm_November2001 » Sat Sep 16, 2017 11:39 pm

Wow, the models with Maria and Jose are all over the place this evening, more so the latter than the former though. Crazy, crazy stuff I must say. I feel so sorry for the emergency planners who are trying to sort through this info to base their long-range plans upon.
Last edited by Hybridstorm_November2001 on Sat Sep 16, 2017 11:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#410 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Sep 16, 2017 11:40 pm

Craters wrote:
Alyono wrote:not usableafter PR

GFS thinks Jose will somehow intensify after it goes stationary over cool waters. Whole run should be thrown out after 132 hours as it is not physically possible as GFS portrays it to be


Alyono -- I might be oversimplifying things, but that seems to be an exceedingly fundamental, basic, first-principles sort of fly in the ointment. Jose would be over cooler water and it would be at a high latitude, so Coriolis forces would be greater (Does anything stay stationary at that latitude?). Could it have transitioned to being extratropical? How could such a flagrant error propagate itself through the run?

I guess what I'm having trouble grasping is the fact that this kind of thing doesn't involve just a sign error or something simple like that in the GFS calculations -- it has to be a whole mind-numbing chain of solutions to God-only-knows how many differential equations, physical laws, etc. How is something like that possible in what is, in reality, a world-class global model? I just don't get it...

Thanks --

Mark


the problem is truncating.. we have yet to solve the many fluid dynamical equations so even one error is compounded...

among such errors intial data etc.. we have along way to go..
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

WeatherHoon
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 131
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 6:12 am

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#411 Postby WeatherHoon » Sun Sep 17, 2017 12:03 am

Does it really matter whether Jose is ET/weak or not in regards to how it breaks down the ridge?
2 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#412 Postby WeatherEmperor » Sun Sep 17, 2017 12:17 am

00z Canadian still hits Florida

Image


Sent from my iPhone 7 using Tapatalk
1 likes   

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#413 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Sun Sep 17, 2017 12:18 am

WeatherHoon wrote:Does it really matter whether Jose is ET/weak or not in regards to how it breaks down the ridge?

Yes
0 likes   

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6305
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#414 Postby LarryWx » Sun Sep 17, 2017 12:19 am

WeatherHoon wrote:Does it really matter whether Jose is ET/weak or not in regards to how it breaks down the ridge?


This. Does it really matter if the GFS has Jose too strong as regards still allowing for a weakness capable of recurving Maria?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#415 Postby AutoPenalti » Sun Sep 17, 2017 12:21 am

WeatherEmperor wrote:00z Canadian still hits Florida

Image


Sent from my iPhone 7 using Tapatalk

Albeit weak unless that's a low resolution?
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

Ian2401
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 307
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 5:55 pm
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#416 Postby Ian2401 » Sun Sep 17, 2017 12:24 am

AutoPenalti wrote:
WeatherEmperor wrote:00z Canadian still hits Florida

Image


Sent from my iPhone 7 using Tapatalk

Albeit weak unless that's a low resolution?


CMC this season has always had it significantly weaker than it actually was.
0 likes   
B.S. Meteorology from Florida State '24 // Current M.S. Meteorology student at Florida State

Research Interests: Rapid Intensification, TC Climatology, TC Modeling

Consult the NHC for official information

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6305
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#417 Postby LarryWx » Sun Sep 17, 2017 12:27 am

AxaltaRacing24 wrote:
WeatherHoon wrote:Does it really matter whether Jose is ET/weak or not in regards to how it breaks down the ridge?

Yes


Why? Please explain why a weaker than GFS progged Jose that lingers wouldn't still have a good chance to lead to a safe recurve offshore the east coast via the weakness it would cause to the north of Maria. I think the key is whether or not Jose lingers rather than his strong he is because that would likely still pull Maria up north into the weakness since there'd no longer be steering winds underneath a high bringing her NW. Now perhaps there'd still be a small risk to E NC and E New England.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

WeatherHoon
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 131
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 6:12 am

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#418 Postby WeatherHoon » Sun Sep 17, 2017 12:32 am

LarryWx wrote:
AxaltaRacing24 wrote:
WeatherHoon wrote:Does it really matter whether Jose is ET/weak or not in regards to how it breaks down the ridge?

Yes


Why? Please explain why a weaker than GFS progged Jose that lingers wouldn't still have a good chance to lead to a safe recurve offshore the east coast via the weakness it would cause to the north of Maria. I think the key is whether or not Jose lingers rather than his strong he is.

There's the answer I was looking for. So if I'm understanding this correctly, A Jose still in the picture (no matter the strength)=more of a chance of a ridge breakdown to allow Maria to turn more North while a Jose leaving the picture quicker would allow the ridge to build back in quicker and force Maria more to the West?
1 likes   

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6305
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#419 Postby LarryWx » Sun Sep 17, 2017 12:40 am

WeatherHoon wrote:
LarryWx wrote:
AxaltaRacing24 wrote:Yes


Why? Please explain why a weaker than GFS progged Jose that lingers wouldn't still have a good chance to lead to a safe recurve offshore the east coast via the weakness it would cause to the north of Maria. I think the key is whether or not Jose lingers rather than his strong he is.

There's the answer I was looking for. So if I'm understanding this correctly, A Jose still in the picture (no matter the strength)=more of a chance of a ridge breakdown to allow Maria to turn more North while a Jose leaving the picture quicker would allow the ridge to build back in quicker and force Maria more to the West?


That is pretty much my thinking. To back this up, I have found exactly ZERO
hurricanes since 1851 (yes, I looked at every year today) which came W, WNW, NW, or NNW into the SE US with a TS+ lingering to the north or NE near or within about 500 miles of the east coast of the US. So, I just don't see a hurricane coming into the SE US with another TC above it.
3 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#420 Postby wxmann_91 » Sun Sep 17, 2017 12:51 am

WeatherHoon wrote:
LarryWx wrote:
AxaltaRacing24 wrote:Yes


Why? Please explain why a weaker than GFS progged Jose that lingers wouldn't still have a good chance to lead to a safe recurve offshore the east coast via the weakness it would cause to the north of Maria. I think the key is whether or not Jose lingers rather than his strong he is.

There's the answer I was looking for. So if I'm understanding this correctly, A Jose still in the picture (no matter the strength)=more of a chance of a ridge breakdown to allow Maria to turn more North while a Jose leaving the picture quicker would allow the ridge to build back in quicker and force Maria more to the West?

That's how I feel too to be honest. If anything, a stronger Jose is more likely to be picked up and kicked out in the North Atlantic. Whereas a weaker, shallower system could linger around and reintensify over the Gulf Stream, and steer Maria out.
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests