ATL: MARIA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#961 Postby Alyono » Mon Sep 18, 2017 7:36 pm

HWRF a total joke. It has Maria MISSING Dominica
6 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#962 Postby gatorcane » Mon Sep 18, 2017 7:47 pm

Jose is looking real bad tonight. We will see if models adjust Maria track accordingly.
0 likes   

Ian2401
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 307
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 5:55 pm
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#963 Postby Ian2401 » Mon Sep 18, 2017 7:59 pm

gatorcane wrote:Jose is looking real bad tonight. We will see if models adjust Maria track accordingly.


Looks like its on life support. Would this be considered Extra/Post-Tropical yet? Sure looks like it.
2 likes   
B.S. Meteorology from Florida State '24 // Current M.S. Meteorology student at Florida State

Research Interests: Rapid Intensification, TC Climatology, TC Modeling

Consult the NHC for official information

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#964 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Sep 18, 2017 8:02 pm

HWRF has done Great with the intensity.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

smithtim
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 110
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:43 pm

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#965 Postby smithtim » Mon Sep 18, 2017 8:08 pm

IMHO the 0z runs overnight will be crucial... assuming they have initial values plugged in as after this crazy RI that just happened (I can't recall anything like it, can anyone?) as gotta think almost double strength from yesterday...

Prayers for the people of Dominica!!!
2 likes   
Disclaimer: while I am PhD who does research I'm rambling here so this post should be taken only for entertainment...use nhc.noaa.gov for official forecasts!

FLoridian living round here for a while: 2016 Matthew & 1998 Earl lived barrier island landfall. Also lived nearby/inland for: 2017 Irma & 2004 Frances,Jeanne & 1992 Andrew

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#966 Postby Ken711 » Mon Sep 18, 2017 8:10 pm

gatorcane wrote:Jose is looking real bad tonight. We will see if models adjust Maria track accordingly.


They'll likely shift west with the ridge less affected by Jose.
0 likes   

User avatar
CFLHurricane
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 346
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2014 5:56 pm
Location: Floriduh

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#967 Postby CFLHurricane » Mon Sep 18, 2017 8:32 pm

Ken711 wrote:
gatorcane wrote:Jose is looking real bad tonight. We will see if models adjust Maria track accordingly.


They'll likely shift west with the ridge less affected by Jose.


Probably followed by further shifts W due to Maria latching onto PR and Hispaniola.
1 likes   
I'm not a meteorologist, but I did stay at a motel 8.

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#968 Postby floridasun78 » Mon Sep 18, 2017 8:33 pm

look site go earlier and lastest you see sift more to west most models look jose gaving high chance build west http://hurricanecity.com/models/models. ... atestrun=1
0 likes   

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#969 Postby Ken711 » Mon Sep 18, 2017 8:37 pm

CFLHurricane wrote:
Ken711 wrote:
gatorcane wrote:Jose is looking real bad tonight. We will see if models adjust Maria track accordingly.


They'll likely shift west with the ridge less affected by Jose.


Probably followed by further shifts W due to Maria latching onto PR and Hispaniola.


Maria may track just north of Hispaniola, don't think it will have much affect.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7183
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: RE: Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#970 Postby jlauderdal » Mon Sep 18, 2017 8:50 pm

Ken711 wrote:
CFLHurricane wrote:
Ken711 wrote:
They'll likely shift west with the ridge less affected by Jose.


Probably followed by further shifts W due to Maria latching onto PR and Hispaniola.


Maria may track just north of Hispaniola, don't think it will have much affect.
Possible inflow issues and pr will knock.it down..i say it loses two categories from pr to the bahamas
1 likes   

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: RE: Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#971 Postby Blinhart » Mon Sep 18, 2017 8:59 pm

jlauderdal wrote:
Ken711 wrote:
CFLHurricane wrote:
Probably followed by further shifts W due to Maria latching onto PR and Hispaniola.


Maria may track just north of Hispaniola, don't think it will have much affect.
Possible inflow issues and pr will knock.it down..i say it loses two categories from pr to the bahamas


I really think it depends on the size she is when she it hits PR or Hispaniola. I think Hispaniola would decapitate her more than PR and it would actually be better of the 2 options. PR has already been ravaged by Irma and is still trying to clean up, they don't need to have a Cat 5 with winds over 160 MPH coming to them.
3 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#972 Postby floridasun78 » Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:04 pm

new run i can see here got more southern bahamas last models run here site i am looking over and over make sure eye not playing games http://hurricanecity.com/models/models. ... run=latest
1 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7183
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#973 Postby jlauderdal » Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:04 pm

Blinhart wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:
Ken711 wrote:
Maria may track just north of Hispaniola, don't think it will have much affect.
Possible inflow issues and pr will knock.it down..i say it loses two categories from pr to the bahamas


I really think it depends on the size she is when she it hits PR or Hispaniola. I think Hispaniola would decapitate her more than PR and it would actually be better of the 2 options. PR has already been ravaged by Irma and is still trying to clean up, they don't need to have a Cat 5 with winds over 160 MPH coming to them.
Its approaching from.the se...pr is either taking a direct hit or on the dirty side
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#974 Postby fci » Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:16 pm

Alyono wrote:
gatorcane wrote:Looks like even less ridging on the 18Z GFS at 72 hours than 12Z. It is hard to discount the GFS and ECMWF as far as how they are intensifying Jose no matter what Jose might look like right now.


stop the modelology, please. If a solution is not physical, it is OK to discount it


With all due respect, how do people just stop looking at the models?
NHC and Pro Mets use them so they ARE of use and combined with Climatology seem to be the most logical tools.
Maybe I don't understand since you are a scientist and I'm not, but how is there a "physical solution" in the future.
I'm no scientist so maybe I misunderstood what you are implying in your post.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts are just my opinion and are most likely not backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Bottom line is that I am just expressing my opinion!!!

aperson
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 336
Age: 37
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 10:56 pm

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#975 Postby aperson » Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:26 pm

fci wrote:
Alyono wrote:
gatorcane wrote:Looks like even less ridging on the 18Z GFS at 72 hours than 12Z. It is hard to discount the GFS and ECMWF as far as how they are intensifying Jose no matter what Jose might look like right now.


stop the modelology, please. If a solution is not physical, it is OK to discount it


With all due respect, how do people just stop looking at the models?
NHC and Pro Mets use them so they ARE of use and combined with Climatology seem to be the most logical tools.
Maybe I don't understand since you are a scientist and I'm not, but how is there a "physical solution" in the future.
I'm no scientist so maybe I misunderstood what you are implying in your post.


My two cents as a hobbyist:

All models are wrong but some models are useful. When models begin making fundamentally different decisions than what we expect, we need to see if the scenario is possible. Like in Harvey's case, the off-the-rails precipitation totals were completely possible, so we didn't discount them. However in this case, I really don't see any way this system can remain tropical and strengthen as it increases latitude with the current atmospheric setup, shear, and SSTs.

When we have decided that the surprise a model threw at us is likely erroneous, it's time to admit that variance is higher than we had hoped for and we need to start figuring out what the alternative without relying on the models would look like. If the models do verify and surprise us, then we have work to do post hoc to understand what they were seeing. If the models don't verify, then we have work to do on the models themselves.
Last edited by aperson on Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:39 pm, edited 2 times in total.
4 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7183
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: RE: Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#976 Postby jlauderdal » Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:26 pm

fci wrote:
Alyono wrote:
gatorcane wrote:Looks like even less ridging on the 18Z GFS at 72 hours than 12Z. It is hard to discount the GFS and ECMWF as far as how they are intensifying Jose no matter what Jose might look like right now.


stop the modelology, please. If a solution is not physical, it is OK to discount it


With all due respect, how do people just stop looking at the models?
NHC and Pro Mets use them so they ARE of use and combined with Climatology seem to be the most logical tools.
Maybe I don't understand since you are a scientist and I'm not, but how is there a "physical solution" in the future.
I'm no scientist so maybe I misunderstood what you are implying in your post.
The modeling can show a solution that makes no sense so it gets discounted as highly unlikely or impossible...it happens,...it will.settle down in the next day or so as joses fate in the real.world is decided
1 likes   

User avatar
MetroMike
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 952
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:13 pm
Location: Tampa Bay
Contact:

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#977 Postby MetroMike » Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:38 pm

I thought dissipating TC still left some weakness in their wake?
1 likes   

Voltron
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 52
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 6:13 pm

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#978 Postby Voltron » Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:39 pm

MetroMike wrote:I thought dissipating TC still left some weakness in their wake?


Yes but not enough to have a measureable difference. If it errodes quick enough. Like a flower losing pedals.
2 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#979 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:43 pm

Voltron wrote:
MetroMike wrote:I thought dissipating TC still left some weakness in their wake?


Yes but not enough to have a measureable difference. If it errodes quick enough. Like a flower losing pedals.


In this case becasue of the cold water convection technically would be zero just a low cloud swirl which would have little to no effect on the mid to upper-level ridging that would build back in. IT IS STILL WAY TO EARLY to know. just have to wait and watch for 2 or 3 days..
2 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: MARIA - Models

#980 Postby floridasun78 » Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:45 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
Voltron wrote:
MetroMike wrote:I thought dissipating TC still left some weakness in their wake?


Yes but not enough to have a measureable difference. If it errodes quick enough. Like a flower losing pedals.


In this case becasue of the cold water convection technically would be zero just a low cloud swirl which would have little to no effect on the mid to upper-level ridging that would build back in. IT IS STILL WAY TO EARLY to know. just have to wait and watch for 2 or 3 days..

i seen few move more to west near bahamas last one i seen
1 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests