im sticking with florence sc just because you know its florencechaser1 wrote:I've been pretty steadfast on guessing Florence S.C. as point of landfall but am close to changing that thought to Jacksonville/Savannah instead.

Moderator: S2k Moderators
im sticking with florence sc just because you know its florencechaser1 wrote:I've been pretty steadfast on guessing Florence S.C. as point of landfall but am close to changing that thought to Jacksonville/Savannah instead.
Cumulonimbus_Ca wrote:GCANE wrote:...climatology...
I'm super interested in this. As far as I can tell, most 'climatological' tropical storm predictions seem useless in a world with changing climate. Water temperatures are different. Patterns are different. Why would the climate be a good indicator of where a current storm is going? I don't follow the logic here at all. It is using a static variable to guess a moving target. It's not going to work.
And where do these people get off suggesting that climate-based historical tracks of hurricanes are an indicator *at all* of where a current storm is going? Is there evidence to support this? It seems to me that it is a lot more likely that a storm in a current position has *never* closely resembled the starting conditions of any storm in history. I would suggest that the people using climatology tracks are being dense on-purpose, as I think there is no evidence whatsoever to support their points.
Are there any studies or data on the effectiveness of climatological data when looking at storm paths today? Is the effectiveness decreasing or was it never effective to begin with?
Cumulonimbus_Ca wrote:GCANE wrote:...climatology...
I'm super interested in this. As far as I can tell, most 'climatological' tropical storm predictions seem useless in a world with changing climate. Water temperatures are different. Patterns are different. Why would the climate be a good indicator of where a current storm is going? I don't follow the logic here at all. It is using a static variable to guess a moving target. It's not going to work.
And where do these people get off suggesting that climate-based historical tracks of hurricanes are an indicator *at all* of where a current storm is going? Is there evidence to support this? It seems to me that it is a lot more likely that a storm in a current position has *never* closely resembled the starting conditions of any storm in history. I would suggest that the people using climatology tracks are being dense on-purpose, as I think there is no evidence whatsoever to support their points.
Are there any studies or data on the effectiveness of climatological data when looking at storm paths today? Is the effectiveness decreasing or was it never effective to begin with?
jlauderdal wrote:im sticking with florence sc just because you know its florencechaser1 wrote:I've been pretty steadfast on guessing Florence S.C. as point of landfall but am close to changing that thought to Jacksonville/Savannah instead....we have seen the models underestimate these ridges too many times and even when recon goes in we see the models underestimate them, this system is very dangerous for the united states, fema better get ready
maybe but we have 7 weeks to go at least in floridachaser1 wrote:jlauderdal wrote:im sticking with florence sc just because you know its florencechaser1 wrote:I've been pretty steadfast on guessing Florence S.C. as point of landfall but am close to changing that thought to Jacksonville/Savannah instead....we have seen the models underestimate these ridges too many times and even when recon goes in we see the models underestimate them, this system is very dangerous for the united states, fema better get ready
Yeah, i'm afraid this might turn out to be this season's "high-light storm"
Aric Dunn wrote:Still diving south of west. pretty much wsw at a decent clip. if it gets before 24.5m it will be lower than all the models.
HurricaneEric wrote:I keep seeing posts that Flo is approaching 24N but I keep seeing credible sources still plotting the LLC at 25N... is there any updated sources that can officially say the LLC has moved south of 25N???
HurricaneEric wrote:I keep seeing posts that Flo is approaching 24N but I keep seeing credible sources still plotting the LLC at 25N... is there any updated sources that can officially say the LLC has moved south of 25N???
Blown Away wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:Still diving south of west. pretty much wsw at a decent clip. if it gets before 24.5m it will be lower than all the models.
Can u show a graphic locating that LLC?
meriland29 wrote:Is there anything likely in Florences future that will possibly destabilise its intensity once closer to the states? I notice a insane ridge that looks to solidly steer her west but also that her intensity should reach major status a whole 2 days before she nears the states..
tolakram wrote:HurricaneEric wrote:I keep seeing posts that Flo is approaching 24N but I keep seeing credible sources still plotting the LLC at 25N... is there any updated sources that can officially say the LLC has moved south of 25N???
The only source that counts is the NHC.
25.0°N 51.8°W
Aric Dunn wrote:tolakram wrote:HurricaneEric wrote:I keep seeing posts that Flo is approaching 24N but I keep seeing credible sources still plotting the LLC at 25N... is there any updated sources that can officially say the LLC has moved south of 25N???
The only source that counts is the NHC.
25.0°N 51.8°W
we wont see an offical location until 5pm
some fresh microwaves images will help though
Aric Dunn wrote:tolakram wrote:HurricaneEric wrote:I keep seeing posts that Flo is approaching 24N but I keep seeing credible sources still plotting the LLC at 25N... is there any updated sources that can officially say the LLC has moved south of 25N???
The only source that counts is the NHC.
25.0°N 51.8°W
we wont see an offical location until 5pm
some fresh microwaves images will help though
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests