ATL: FLORENCE - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5493
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#1921 Postby chaser1 » Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:20 pm



See that small flock of pelicans down there? There's a lot of pressure on the one flying point to keep the right vector going :lol:
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

seahawkjd
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 632
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 4:12 pm
Location: Morehead City, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#1922 Postby seahawkjd » Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:21 pm

Sorry for the off topic post but I just realized that as of today I have been a member on the board for 15 years. You all really didn't need to send a major hurricane my way in celebration lol. :cry:
3 likes   
Gloria, Hugo, Emily, Bertha, Bonnie, Dennis (twice), Fran, Floyd, Isabel, Irene, Arthur, Matthew, Florence, Dorian (and many tropical storms and nor'easters).

User avatar
WAcyclone
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 352
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2017 1:56 pm
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#1923 Postby WAcyclone » Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:22 pm

Looks like there are instantaneous windspeeds well above the Cat 5 threshold in the lower parts of the southern eyewall:

Image
0 likes   

plasticup

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Recon Discussion

#1924 Postby plasticup » Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:23 pm

Image

Does this dropsonde show 143 kt surface-level winds in the southern eyewall? I am reading that correctly?
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: RE: Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#1925 Postby cheezyWXguy » Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:24 pm

jlauderdal wrote:
tatertawt24 wrote:
cheezyWXguy wrote:Florence is making some pretty solid progress of developing a ring of -69C to -75C cloud temps around its eye. Im not all that familiar with the dvorak technique, but isn't that closing in on 6.0?


This seems like a decent page for Dvorak updates.

http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/adt/odt06L.html
You have recon, i suggest using that.

So you're saying there is no point in becoming familiar with the dvorak technique for future use cases, because we have recon available for this one?
0 likes   

Exalt
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 337
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 10:55 pm

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#1926 Postby Exalt » Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:24 pm

viewtopic.php?f=30&t=119915

Can someone give me some evacuation advice? Am in the W&M campus, considering evacuation tomorrow night. Thanks.
0 likes   

plasticup

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#1927 Postby plasticup » Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:24 pm

WAcyclone wrote:Looks like there are instantaneous windspeeds well above the Cat 5 threshold in the southern eyewall:


I just posted that in the Recon Discussion thread. It is so incongruous with other measurements, although there was that one 123 kt SFMR flagged reading.
0 likes   

NotoSans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1380
Age: 25
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2015 1:15 am
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#1928 Postby NotoSans » Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:25 pm

The eyewall dropsonde suggests that the SFMR winds may actually be valid. I personally would have go with 120 knots right now.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC and NWS products.

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5493
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#1929 Postby chaser1 » Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:27 pm

I'm really doubting that we're even seeing a "stair-stepping" going on at this point. Seems to me that Flo's motion is far less erratic and looking pretty steady. If an increase in forward speed were to be beginning to occur then I'd guess this train(wreck) might have finally read NHC's script.
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

plasticup

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#1930 Postby plasticup » Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:27 pm

We may get another Update Statement. If the NHC find this data credible, Florence is already a Category 5. And firmly in that range, too.
1 likes   

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3355
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#1931 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:28 pm

Dropsonde found 143 knots at the surface, with Cat 5 winds all the way to the 910mb level.

Could be a gust, but wow.

http://tropicalatlantic.com/recon/recon ... 49-152-143
Last edited by Hypercane_Kyle on Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#1932 Postby Ken711 » Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:29 pm

chaser1 wrote:I'm really doubting that we're even seeing a "stair-stepping" going on at this point. Seems to me that Flo's motion is far less erratic and looking pretty steady. If an increase in forward speed were to be beginning to occur then I'd guess this train(wreck) might have finally read NHC's script.


Was it suppose to have started moving wnw by now according to the NHC forecast?
0 likes   

NotoSans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1380
Age: 25
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2015 1:15 am
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#1933 Postby NotoSans » Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:29 pm

plasticup wrote:We may get another Update Statement. If the NHC find this data credible, Florence is already a Category 5. And firmly in that range, too.

Dropsonde winds are more representative of gust instead of sustained winds. Definitely not a category 5 right now, although Florence has a chance to become one.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC and NWS products.

plasticup

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#1934 Postby plasticup » Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:30 pm

NotoSans wrote:
plasticup wrote:We may get another Update Statement. If the NHC find this data credible, Florence is already a Category 5. And firmly in that range, too.

Dropsonde winds are more representative of gust instead of sustained winds. Definitely not a category 5 right now, although Florence has a chance to become one.

Fair point, thanks.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#1935 Postby KWT » Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:30 pm

Ken711 wrote:
chaser1 wrote:I'm really doubting that we're even seeing a "stair-stepping" going on at this point. Seems to me that Flo's motion is far less erratic and looking pretty steady. If an increase in forward speed were to be beginning to occur then I'd guess this train(wreck) might have finally read NHC's script.


Was it suppose to have started moving wnw by now according to the NHC forecast?


Broadly yes and I think it's pretty much on track right now. Wobbles will start to count more soon enough.
2 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
Gustywind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 12334
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:29 am
Location: Baie-Mahault, GUADELOUPE

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Advisories

#1936 Postby Gustywind » Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:33 pm

cycloneye wrote:
Hurricane Florence Tropical Cyclone Update
NWS National Hurricane Center Miami FL AL062018
1200 PM AST Mon Sep 10 2018

...FLORENCE BECOMES A CATEGORY FOUR HURRICANE...

Data from a NOAA Hurricane Hunter aircraft indicate that Florence
has continued to rapidly stregthen and has maximum sustained winds
near 130 mph (195 km/h). The latest minimum central pressure based
on data from the aircraft is 946 mb (27.93 inches).


SUMMARY OF 1200 PM AST...1600 UTC...INFORMATION
---------------------------------------------------
LOCATION...25.0N 60.2W
ABOUT 575 MI...925 KM SSE OF BERMUDA
ABOUT 1230 MI...1985 KM ESE OF CAPE FEAR NORTH CAROLINA
MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS...130 MPH...195 KM/H
PRESENT MOVEMENT...W OR 280 DEGREES AT 13 MPH...20 KM/H
MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE...946 MB...27.93 INCHES

$$
Forecaster Blake

Just a remark, i think that they make a mistake by writing 130 mph ( 195km/h). Given my poor and untrained eyes 130 mph equals to 210 km/h and not 195km/h as the NHC mentionned ( surely they're busy and a bit stressfull! i understand why)...°meaning by extension a cat 3 cane and not a cane 4 with 130 MPH :eek: like Florence now.
0 likes   

clambite
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15
Age: 72
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2016 9:26 am
Location: Morehead City, NC

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#1937 Postby clambite » Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:34 pm

seahawkjd wrote:Sorry for the off topic post but I just realized that as of today I have been a member on the board for 15 years. You all really didn't need to send a major hurricane my way in celebration lol. :cry:

Did you used to work for Leroy at the Sea Hawk ?
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#1938 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:35 pm

Based on a blend of the dropsonde, SFMR and satellite, I would go with 125 kt right now.
3 likes   

User avatar
WAcyclone
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 352
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2017 1:56 pm
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#1939 Postby WAcyclone » Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:35 pm

NotoSans wrote:
plasticup wrote:We may get another Update Statement. If the NHC find this data credible, Florence is already a Category 5. And firmly in that range, too.

Dropsonde winds are more representative of gust instead of sustained winds. Definitely not a category 5 right now, although Florence has a chance to become one.


Yes, but isn't the lowest 150 meter mean wind more representative of the actual max sustained wind speed? However, it's definitely strange there weren't any flight level winds above 107 knots in the southern eyewall...
0 likes   

NotoSans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1380
Age: 25
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2015 1:15 am
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#1940 Postby NotoSans » Mon Sep 10, 2018 12:35 pm

WAcyclone wrote:
NotoSans wrote:
plasticup wrote:We may get another Update Statement. If the NHC find this data credible, Florence is already a Category 5. And firmly in that range, too.

Dropsonde winds are more representative of gust instead of sustained winds. Definitely not a category 5 right now, although Florence has a chance to become one.


Yes, but isn't the lowest 150 meter mean wind more representative of the actual max sustained wind speed? However, it's definitely strange there weren't any flight level winds above 107 knots in the southern eyewall...


Need to multiply that by an adjustment factor of ~0.85.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC and NWS products.


Return to “2018”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests