ATL: FLORENCE - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
tallywx
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 790
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 10:19 am
Location: Raleigh/Durham, NC

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#2101 Postby tallywx » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:08 pm

5pm discussion alludes to the new disturbance in the W. Carib/GOM affecting ridge strength. How would that interplay exactly? Seems like hedging in the wording.
0 likes   

User avatar
EquusStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1649
Age: 34
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:04 pm
Location: Jasper, AL
Contact:

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#2102 Postby EquusStorm » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:11 pm

Well if the OHC is that frightfully high this thing has three days to hit C5 - the official forecast is 135kt so I see no reason why it wouldn't; a storm for the record books in every way :eek:
2 likes   
Colors of lost purpose on the canvas of irrelevance

Not a meteorologist, in fact more of an idiot than anything. You should probably check with the NHC or a local NWS office for official information.

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 42
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#2103 Postby Hammy » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:14 pm

dukeblue219 wrote:
BobHarlem wrote:From discussion: "Unfortunately, the models were right." Cat 5 forecasted.


Not quite. Forecast is "just" 135 kt... a high Cat 4.


From my observation, they never forecast actual Cat 5 intensity for a hurricane that hasn't previously reached it.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Vdogg
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:56 am

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#2104 Postby Vdogg » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:14 pm

tallywx wrote:5pm discussion alludes to the new disturbance in the W. Carib/GOM affecting ridge strength. How would that interplay exactly? Seems like hedging in the wording.

It could mean that ridging might be weaker than expected, which is why some models are shifting north and east. They have adjusted the track north somewhat, but still west of the model consensus. Tonight's Euro will weigh heavily on what they do with watches and warnings tomorrow.
0 likes   

User avatar
DestinHurricane
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 935
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 8:05 am
Location: New York, NY

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#2105 Postby DestinHurricane » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:14 pm

How warm is the water around the coast? What can stop it from making landfall as a cat 5?
0 likes   
Michael 2018

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#2106 Postby Ken711 » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:14 pm

tallywx wrote:5pm discussion alludes to the new disturbance in the W. Carib/GOM affecting ridge strength. How would that interplay exactly? Seems like hedging in the wording.


The weakness in the ridging which the models seemed to pick up on with some like the Euro moving a little east. How much further east is the question. I see they took out a small section of SC coastline in the cone and extended the cone further over the VA/MD side.
0 likes   

jdjaguar
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: Jacksonville Beach, FL

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#2107 Postby jdjaguar » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:15 pm

BobHarlem wrote:From discussion: "Unfortunately, the models were right." Nearly Cat 5 forecasted. (Cat 5 on old saffir scale at 155mph before the 2012 changes)


What was the rationale behind changing from 155 to 157?
0 likes   

jdjaguar
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: Jacksonville Beach, FL

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#2108 Postby jdjaguar » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:16 pm

DestinHurricane wrote:How warm is the water around the coast? What can stop it from making landfall as a cat 5?

Shear and EWCR
0 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 42
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#2109 Postby Hammy » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:17 pm

jdjaguar wrote:
BobHarlem wrote:From discussion: "Unfortunately, the models were right." Nearly Cat 5 forecasted. (Cat 5 on old saffir scale at 155mph before the 2012 changes)


What was the rationale behind changing from 155 to 157?


I think it was 156 before--but the change was made so that when rounding, all three measurements (MPH, KTS, KPH) would round in the same direction.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

drewschmaltz
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 350
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 8:19 pm

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#2110 Postby drewschmaltz » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:18 pm

DestinHurricane wrote:How warm is the water around the coast? What can stop it from making landfall as a cat 5?


Warm Image
1 likes   
I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. PLEASE CONSULT SOMEONE WHO DOES. START WITH THE NHC. ALL POSTS ARE FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY.

Shell Mound
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2434
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#2111 Postby Shell Mound » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:20 pm

tallywx wrote:5pm discussion alludes to the new disturbance in the W. Carib/GOM affecting ridge strength. How would that interplay exactly? Seems like hedging in the wording.

It imparts stronger mid-level ridging over the Bahamas and SW Atlantic (Sargasso Sea), owing to diabetic heating via convection. A bigger influence on the potential landfall location is the weak upper low to the WNW of Florence. That feature may impart a slight weakness that induces a slight northward component to a strengthening, stacking Florence. The interaction between the Bahamas ridge, the upper low, and Florence likely means the EPS members show landfall too far SW. That does not mean that the GFS solution is correct; it is likely too far NE. However, landfall is likely to occur closer to Morehead City-Ocracoke than to points farther SW. The gradual turn to the WNW has clearly begun sooner than expected, based on satellite imagery, and Florence is thus deviating to northward of the short-term forecast positions. Anyway, the EPS/ECMWF have a notorious tendency to overestimate ridging, while the GEFS/GFS tend to underestimate it.
3 likes   
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

User avatar
Ubuntwo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1406
Age: 31
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 10:41 pm

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#2112 Postby Ubuntwo » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:23 pm

Double wind maximum?

Image
1 likes   
Kendall -> SLO -> PBC

Memorable Storms: Katrina (for its Florida landfall...) Wilma Matthew Irma

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#2113 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:25 pm

the last hour or so it has picked up the pace. heading about 280 to 285
2 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#2114 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:30 pm

Since there have not been any VDM in a while... here are the center passes.

Image
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
meriland29
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:05 am

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#2115 Postby meriland29 » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:31 pm

What is ger current latitude?
0 likes   

Shell Mound
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2434
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#2116 Postby Shell Mound » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:33 pm

Rather than Wilmington-Topsail Beach, a landfall near Morehead City-Ocracoke looks to be in line. A track toward this area would keep the most significant rain and wind to the east of Raleigh-Durham, over a much more sparsely populated area with less infrastructure, relatively speaking (except Rocky Mount-Wilson-Greenville). The fact that Florence has clearly turned earlier than expected and is N of the short-term forecast points likely takes the worst-case scenario(s) out of play, fortunately. The Caribbean disturbance and weak upper low to the WNW of Florence, along with Florence's rapid deepening, are producing a sufficient weakness to nudge the track toward the consensus models and GEFS/GFS vs. the SW-biased EPS/ECMWF. This is very good news in terms of impacts based on population density and property values.
1 likes   
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

User avatar
Extratropical94
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3538
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#2117 Postby Extratropical94 » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:34 pm

meriland29 wrote:What is ger current latitude?

Latest pass was at 25.3-25.4
0 likes   
54° 11' 59'' N, 9° 9' 20'' E
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel

User avatar
johngaltfla
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2069
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 9:17 pm
Location: Sarasota County, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#2118 Postby johngaltfla » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:39 pm

Jesus, Flo has become quite impressive in the past 24 hours. Based on current reports and pressure drops, I wonder if we could see an 880ish-890ish millibar reading before she finishes peaking. :double:
1 likes   

dspguy
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:26 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#2119 Postby dspguy » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:40 pm

dukeblue219 wrote:
dspguy wrote:
supercane4867 wrote:Missing one forecast point slightly couldn't mean less to future track 5 days out. She also missed a forecast point earlier to its south.

Wait, it is NORTH of a forecast point suddenly? I thought it was staying south of the forecast all day. Is this something that occurred in the last few hours?


It's been stair-stepping/wobbling a bit today, so the overall motion is somewhat dependent on when you choose to draw a line between two points. In any case, projecting to miss a single forecast point to the north (or south) means little unless the storm is also showing sustained motion in that direction. Bottom line is that it's on track, and "track" should not be interpreted as a fixed line 1 inch across.

Thanks to you and tarheelprogrammer for the explanation. I just recall hearing a lot of "it isn't turning" this morning. Came back from work and suddenly it was north of some points. Was surprised is all. Is it possible that if it continues staying north of the track, it winds up further east/north by the time it reaches OBX?
0 likes   

User avatar
meriland29
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:05 am

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Hurricane - Discussion

#2120 Postby meriland29 » Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:41 pm

Shell Mound wrote:Rather than Wilmington-Topsail Beach, a landfall near Morehead City-Ocracoke looks to be in line. A track toward this area would keep the most significant rain and wind to the east of Raleigh-Durham, over a much more sparsely populated area with less infrastructure, relatively speaking (except Rocky Mount-Wilson-Greenville). The fact that Florence has clearly turned earlier than expected and is N of the short-term forecast points likely takes the worst-case scenario(s) out of play, fortunately. The Caribbean disturbance and weak upper low to the WNW of Florence, along with Florence's rapid deepening, are producing a sufficient weakness to nudge the track toward the consensus models and GEFS/GFS vs. the SW-biased EPS/ECMWF. This is very good news in terms of impacts based on population density and property values.



Hopefully, but I think it is too early in the change in latitude to think the worst case scenario is potentially off the table..especially given the fact she has strengthened sooner and stronger than previously forecast
0 likes   


Return to “2018”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests